Sentences with phrase «people skills in»

We provide the most professional service and best people skills in the industry.
Professional Duties & Responsibilities Developed proficiencies with medical technology, supplies, and pharmaceuticals over 14 years of nursing Knowledgeable regarding the challenges facing medical professionals across a wide range of disciplines Supported general surgeons as well as surgeons specializing in neurosurgery, transplants, pediatrics, etc.. Built and strengthened long term relationships with physicians, hospital leaders, and community figures Led nursing teams in 13 intensive / critical care units ensuring effective and efficient patient care Monitored, recorded, and reported patient condition to physicians Provided critical care surgical support, wound care, and administered medications Dealt with AMI, septic shock, DKA, and CHF Educated patients and families in healthy diets and exercise Assisted in admission, transfer, discharge, and documentation of patients Managed medical supplies, equipment, and medications ensuring adequate and functioning materials Proven ability to adapt medical knowledge and people skills in fast paced, ever changing environments Performed all duties in a positive, professional, and timely manner
It is additionally essential that they have excellent customer service and people skills in order to form relationships with their customers.
cash, Cash Register, credit, customer service, customer service skills, drivers, Fax, GPS... Summary Seeking a customer service position where I can maximize my people skills in a demanding work... timely manner.
They need people skills in order to work with those they serve and to communicate with any other service provider.
And you really need people skills in this profession cause let's face it, it's stressful.
Make sure that you include your technical skills that are particular to the job, as well as your people skills in working with physicians and other medical staff.
Employers want to make sure you work well with people you see on a daily basis, so do not forget to mention your people skills in your resume.
>> Cashier Resume Example: A resume template for job in a growing retail chain, highlighting people skills in providing top - notch customer service.
Your people skills in groups can help you earn an interview, but you also have to master the one - on - one communication.
It can be very helpful to have people skills in addition to dog training skills.
During Tikoian's visit to Bernon Heights, she spoke with students about the importance of writing, mathematics, and people skills in the banking field.
Perera has people skills in spades.
In fact, in Dave Kerpen's book, «The Art of People,» he emphasizes how important it is to hone your people skills in order to charm and win over those who matter, in both your personal and professional life.
It's racing to reinvent itself for the digital marketplace, and to do that, it needs people skilled in new technologies.
In addition, the patent must provide enough description to allow a person skilled in the art to reproduce the invention.
To the psychiatrist or the person skilled in deliverance, they typically look quite different and their descriptions (in the Bible or in psychiatric textbooks) are also different.
People skilled in childbirth will be the most helpful as they may offer good advice on how to manage the pain.
As a result, people skilled in bioinformatics will probably remain needed for years to come.
In the patent application, the invention must be presented in such a way that a diverse audience, ranging from a person skilled in the arts to a judge with no scientific background, can understand it.
We do not have enough people skilled in science, technology, engineering and maths.»
To accomplish that, we employ people skilled in coal mining, power generation, and corporate support services.
Abbott's evidence was that a person skilled in the art was «well aware that antibodies did not need to be identical to bind to the same cytokine or treat the same disease».
In some ways the notional «person skilled in the art» (who by definition is not inventive) is expected to know more, and earlier, than the inventors themselves (who are obviously inventive).
That is, can you describe your invention / idea in sufficient detail such that a person skilled in the art could make and use it?
«(a) Identify the notional person skilled in the art; (b) Identify the relevant common general knowledge of that person;
No matter the approach, parties should carefully consider the claim language, the patent as a whole, the state of the art, the person skilled in the art and work with their experts to get their facts and arguments before the court.
(4) Viewed without any knowledge of the alleged invention as claimed, do those differences constitute steps which would have been obvious to the person skilled in the art or do they require any degree of invention?
In my view, those references to the inventor's intention refer to an objective manifestation of that intent in the patent claims, as interpreted by the person skilled in the art, and do not contemplate extrinsic evidence such as statements or admissions made in the course of patent prosecution.
Instead of looking to the patent file history, the claim term was analyzed by the court from the perspective of the person skilled in the art looking only at the patent (but not the prosecution history).
... These components themselves were not patented on their own — indeed, they could not be patented since they represent equipment commonly known and used by persons skilled in electrical engineering.
The specification of an invention must... (b) set out clearly the various steps in a process... in such full, clear, concise and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it pertains, or with which it is most closely connected, to... use it;... (d) in the case of a process, explain the necessary sequence, if any, of the various steps, so as to distinguish the invention from other inventions.
The specification of an invention must (a) correctly and fully describe the invention and its operation or use as contemplated by the inventor; (b) set out clearly the various steps in a process, or the method of constructing, making, compounding or using a machine, manufacture or composition of matter, in such full, clear, concise and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it pertains, or with which it is most closely connected, to make, construct, compound or use it; (c) in the case of a machine, explain the principle of the machine and the best mode in which the inventor has contemplated the application of that principle; and (d) in the case of a process, explain the necessary sequence, if any, of the various steps, so as to distinguish the invention from other inventions.
Many firms on the smaller end of what we would consider to be mid-sized may not have a seasoned business development professional capable of leading that process (i.e., the marketing and business development function is staffed by people skilled in marketing communications and / or event planning).
The in vivo studies were applied as evidence that a person skilled in the art would have considered it likely that the techniques disclosed in the references cited in the petition and institution decision would be successful in animals.
During the trial, Genzyme argued that the claimed inventions were not obvious in light of the references, because all the references cited in the petition and decision to institute described in vitro experiments and a person skilled in the art would not have considered it likely that the results would be successful in live animals.
The person skilled in the art has to show the same invention is «plain as day» 10 years earlier.
The four - step approach to obviousness adopted by the Court is as follows: (1)(a) Identify the notional «person skilled in the art»; (b) Identify the relevant common general knowledge of that person; (2) Identify the inventive concept of the claim in question or if that can not readily be done, construe it; (3) Identify what, if any, difference exists between the matter cited as forming part of the «state of the art» and the inventive concept of the claim or the claim as construed; (4) Viewed without any knowledge of the alleged invention as claimed, do those differences constitute steps which would have been obvious to the person skilled in the art or do they require any degree of invention?
A patentee is able to clarify the definition of his invention and how to make it, so the person skilled in the art can make it successfully, by narrowing its claims (and arguably selecting its best compounds from the thousands it may have initially started with at filing).
The four - step approach to obviousness adopted by the Court is as follows: (1)(a) Identify the notional «person skilled in the art»; (b) Identify the relevant common general knowledge of that person; (2) Identify the inventive concept of the claim in question or if that can not readily be done, construe it; (3) Identify what, if any, difference exists between the matter cited as... [more]
At the same time, the person skilled in the art was required to have determined in 1987 that it was «plain as day» that this one compound (as eventually selected to be claimed by the patentee) would be useful for the claimed uses.
This leads to the finding that, had there been only 1 compound claim, the person skilled in the art would not be guessing and would be able to use the invention successfully because they would know the «real compound» must be the specific claimed compound.
The SCC looked at 2 different compound claims and found the person skilled in the art would be unable to identify the «real compound».
The relevant standard and the level of skill is that practiced and accepted by a responsible body of medical persons skilled in the particular area of medicine in question.
An important quid pro quo for a patent, is the disclosure of the details of the innovation sufficient that a person skilled in the art can take advantage of the invention.
Otherwise there would be no need to evaluate the necessary level of disclosure in a patent / whether to also consider the knowledge of the person skilled in the art.
Courts, however, generally require the expert evidence of persons skilled in the art....
the specification of the patent does not disclose the invention sufficiently clearly and completely for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art («insufficiency»), and
Much of that attention is due to the early popularity of the site, the caliber of its investors and exceptional timing — in an age of smartphones and other connected devices, technology has never been more accessible, and the people skilled in its languages never more in demand.
People skilled in piping work are employed in construction industries and industries dealing with oil, natural gases and other types of petroleum products.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z