Sentences with phrase «people solve legal problems»

For me, professional success = helping middle class people solve their legal problems + making enough money to care for my family + not leaving my house.

We are a legal aid advice and referral center helping low - income people solve their legal problems.

No one defined their role as a lawyer as someone interested in helping people solve their legal problems.»

Not exact matches

But as people with experience solving complex problems, leading complex organizations and coping with regulatory and legal issues, they have a valid and vital perspective to express on matters of politics and public policy.

So why does the majority of LSUC's membership tolerate such preference given to the interests of benchers of law firms that serve large institutions and potential investors and not to solving the unaffordable legal services problems of middle and lower income people?

I enjoy meeting people, learning about their lives and careers and most importantly, helping them solve whatever their legal problem is.»

The fear of high charge out rates or the feeling of inferiority when coming face to face with a solicitor are the most common reasons why people do not seek the professional legal help they need to solve their legal problems.

Because of the forces that are greatly increasing the volume of laws and their complexity, people are progressively less able to solve their legal problems by themselves, and are forced to accept law society programs that «cut costs by cutting competence» (e.g., law students, paralegals, self - help, and «unbundling» of legal services).

Contrary to what most people believe, I've personally witnessed lawyers become immensely creative in their legal strategy, but only within the bounds of their litigation matter or the immediate problem that they're solving.

You might not be able to solve all those problems, but you can still provide quality legal advice to people who need it.

Be grateful that you can still impress some people at parties, you can afford to pay the mortgage in your house in the suburbs and that on occasion, you can sit back and say to yourself that you helped solve someone's legal problem and felt good about it.

Usually we're talking about young women who want to know these stories, they want to know the background those are the perfect candidates for the intake position because we don't want them trying to solve this person's problem and most of us even after a few months in the legal industry, we think we have enough information to jump to solving.

Then I think there's kind of this parallel track of issues to unpack where there's a distinction between small firms that have built their business model around being able to help solve problems of access, whether that's around unbundling their services or how they do their pricing, or giving away some free do it yourself content on the front end, whether that's also as part of their lead acquisition strategy or just as a service to people who need it, is I think separate from people who then volunteer their time in pro bono efforts, or people who donate their money to legal charitable causes.

We talked about an access to justice gap, but what people are usually talking about is an access to lawyers gap because there is actually no gap in the number of people who have their legal problems solved.

Meanwhile, another, different, pressure is being applied as more and more people choose to solve their legal problems without the help of lawyers.

(2) I believe that trying to find a just solution to a contentious matter is as if not more demanding than arguing for its resolution according to legal precedents (I always tell my students that they are mistaken if they believe that mooting is the pinnacle of intellectual achievement in law school — in fact it is learning how to negotiate, mediate and problem - solve)(3) Learning how to problem - solve (which includes relating to the people as well as the problem) is a good deal more practical and important for prospective lawyers than being able to find and apply legal precedent, any well - trained monkey can learn to do that and (4) I think we make the mistake all the time of imagining that knowledge and skills are somehow binary processes.

But here will be interesting questions in future, like as AI can solve some legal problems, it can probably already solve some legal problems better than people can.

A shift towards problem - solving outside the strict confines of the legal system and more advisory roles will also have an impact on people and skills.

We want to use technology to help our legal professionals and at the same time pave the way to help people at large to solve their legal problems.

As a result, many people (and this includes many in the public sector) would rather solve their own legal problems by using Google in a haphazard and dangerous way.

Technology innovators want to solve legal problems once for an unlimited number of people, which will allow them to provide the service more cheaply than is possible with current methods.

Edwin (Ed) W. Orr is proud to carry on the tradition of practicing general litigation law, representing people in order to help them and solve their legal problems effectively and efficiently.

The nonprofit legal aid advice and referral center, available by phone to low - income people throughout Connecticut, helps clients solve their legal problems for free.

Ultimately being chosen to help a person or company to solve their legal problems is a privilege, not a right, and firms that are focused on innovating in the right way realise this.

However, the building of this kind of process requires a knowledge about substantive legal problems and how people practically can solve them which would go beyond what a court in this country would normally hold themselves out as holding.

With a global family of employees made up of industry experts and people with experience working at law firms and major corporations, TLS represents a vast network of resource roven success in solutions engineering, problem solving, and delivering legal support services that clients can trust — anywhere in the world.

But here's the problem: If the access to legal services gap in Oregon is approximately 1.2 Million people (30 % of our ~ 4M population), then that amount of pro bono effort would solve just 2.5 % of the need.

And it wouldn't solve the problem of people who are not barred anywhere, such as the many paralegals who do doc review side by side with licensed lawyers, or the thousands of foreign lawyers who do offshore outsourced legal process work.

It's widely accepted that most people can't gain access to legal procedures and remedies that could help solve their problems and improve their life situations.

OnlineTNJustice.org allows Tennessee's attorneys to close the justice gap and help more people solve their civil legal problems.

Partnering across legal, social services, medical and information providers to address the array of justice needs that people face may be the key to the early detection, diagnosis and intervention necessary to empower Alaskans to solve their problems before they find themselves in the legal system.

«Each app offers the ability to solve a particular problem for an unlimited number of parties concurrently,» he says, adding that AI has the potential to extend legal services to people who have been failed by the justice system.

Many people can't afford a lawyer and there are not enough pro bono attorneys to help everyone, but they still must engage in the legal system to solve critical problems like domestic violence, divorce, eviction, and foreclosure.

This question is being asked more broadly in Law Schools as legal academics and lawyers bring design principles to the question of where and how people access legal education, where and how people learn about law, and where and how people solve the problems that matter most in their lives.

Both solutions will occur because the power of the news media and of the internet, interacting, will quickly make widely known these types of information, the cumulative effect of which will force governments and the courts to act: (1) the situations of the thousands of people whose lives have been ruined because they could not obtain the help of a lawyer; (2) the statistics as to the increasing percentages of litigants who are unrepresented and clogging the courts, causing judges to provide more public warnings; (3) the large fees that some lawyers charge; (4) increasing numbers of people being denied Legal Aid and court - appointed lawyers; (5) the many years that law societies have been unsuccessful in coping with this problem which continues to grow worse; (6) people prosecuted for «the unauthorized practice of law» because they tried to help others desperately in need of a lawyer whom they couldn't afford to hire; (7) that there is no truly effective advertising creating competition among law firms that could cause them to lower their fees; (8) that law societies are too comfortably protected by their monopoly over the provision of legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable Legal Aid and court - appointed lawyers; (5) the many years that law societies have been unsuccessful in coping with this problem which continues to grow worse; (6) people prosecuted for «the unauthorized practice of law» because they tried to help others desperately in need of a lawyer whom they couldn't afford to hire; (7) that there is no truly effective advertising creating competition among law firms that could cause them to lower their fees; (8) that law societies are too comfortably protected by their monopoly over the provision of legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable cost.

; (4) taxpayers would not have to pay for a justice system that provides lawyers a good place to earn a living but doesn't provide affordable legal services for those taxpayers; (5) the problem wouldn't be causing more damage in one day than all of the incompetent and unethical lawyers have caused in the whole of Canada's history (6) the legal profession would be expanding instead of contracting; because, (7) if legal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal services for those taxpayers; (5) the problem wouldn't be causing more damage in one day than all of the incompetent and unethical lawyers have caused in the whole of Canada's history (6) the legal profession would be expanding instead of contracting; because, (7) if legal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal profession would be expanding instead of contracting; because, (7) if legal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rLegal Bill - To High?»

The latest legal needs survey in the Netherlands (Geschilbeslechtingsdelta 2014) suggests that 48 per cent of people seeking assistance in the legal sector want advice about how to solve problems; 45 per cent advice about their rights and obligations; 24 per cent help with approaching the other party; 20 per cent mediation; 18 per cent some kind of financial advice; and 16 per cent help with starting a procedure.

Today, the Internet is an obvious and popular tool to help potential consumers understand their choices in many markets, but it is still a confusing, unreliable, and under - developed resource for people who are seeking help to solve a legal problem.

Whitespace Legal Collab stems from the major lesson I learned building the award - winning iG360 end - to - end compliance tool: that the right people working together to solve the right problem, in the right environment is a game changer.

And right now, legal hackers seem to be getting their projects mainly from municipalities and a few «thought leaders» within the academe — people who generally don't have the kind of deep knowledge about legal problems facing solo and small - firm lawyers and their clients that would be necessary to come up with a list of problems to solve.

«We were looking for people who would think more like a GC would think, which is let me solve the business problem with a creative legal solution versus a standard white - shoe answer, which is there are three ways to do it and it doesn't look like you're going to be able to do what you're planning on doing,» he says.

Communication (eg the ability to communicate legal concepts to clients), resilience (eg the ability to overcome difficult situations and work under pressure), teamwork, persuasiveness, people skills, lateral thinking, problem solving and career motivation are some of the skills successful lawyers rely on.

The Role involves: * leads generation * Sales: cold calling, field marketing, networking * developing a good understanding of clients, their industry, what they do, their work culture and environment * maintaining a great relationship with excisting clients * providing out of hours service for the branch's clients * account management * keeping company database up to date with candidates and client's information and bookings made * resourcing, reference checking and registering new candidates ensuring all legal requirements are met * developing and maintaining relationships with candidates * advertising vacancies and matching candidates to available positions * marketing candidates out to existing company clients * assisting with payroll The ideal candidate will have: * excellent customer service and sale skills * ability to manage and prioritize your own workload * excellent communication skills both verbal and written * positive attitude, ambition, high level of commitment to a job and drive to obtain set goals * ability to work under pressure in a fast paced environment * great people and problem solving skills * own transport Our Offer: * salary: # 18 000 - # 24 000 per annum * great commission structure * private health care after qualified period of service * employee perks & discounts from some of the UK's biggest brands If this position is for you, submit your CV today!

Tags for this Online Resume: Human Resources Manager, Human Resources Director, Senior Human Resources Manager, Strategic Human Resources Management, Research, Competency models, People review, HR Communications, Employee Engagement and Employment Brand Management, Managing a Results Driven Team, Strategic Business Planning and Reporting, Group Facilitation and Conflict Resolution, Culture Change and Managing Diversity, Organisation Restructuring, Recruitment and Retention, Compensation and Benefits, Managing Skill Shortages, Industrial Relations, Safety and the Environment, Executive Coaching and Mentoring, Corporate Services Management, Project Management, Distance management, Remote location, Senior Business Partner, Private sector, Public sector, Education sector, Professional Services, Health sector, Housing sector, Risk and assurance, Information Technology, IT, Hospitality sector, Legal sector, Accounting sector, Strategic Agility, Influencing and Negotiating, Developing Recruitment Strategies and Corporate Training Programmes, Diversity Management, including Indigenous Human Resources Development, Human Resources Development, People Management, Improving business performance through Organisation Development, Technical Knowledge, Problem Solving and Decision Making, Navigate Hurdles and Sensitive Issues, Client Responsiveness, Communication, Consulting and Monitoring, Team Development, Leadership and Achievement, Integrity, Honesty and Trust, Professionalism and Self Management, Relationship Building and Working with Others, Relationship Management, Continuous Improvement, International Industry Expert, Policy Development, Appreciative Inquiry, Coaching, Mentoring, Technical Training, Employment Brand Manager, Executive, Legislation, Employee relations, Unions, Fellow, Certified, Outstanding employee, Succession Planning, Career Development, Analysis and targeted development of talent and high potential programmes, Performance Management, Collective Bargaining and Disputes Resolution, Health and Safety, Employee Wellness, Employee Assistance Programmes, Pyschographic Profiling, Not - for - profit sector, Building sector, Emergency Management, Business Continuity, Risk Management, Compliance, Governance, Pandemic Planning and Risk Mitigation, People Capability, Media sector, Advising, Leadership and management development

Assembling the Team — Because collaborative divorce treats the divorce like a problem to be solved rather than a competition between the parties, the process is set up to deal with all three of the dimensions of issues that come up for people going through divorce — legal, financial, and emotional.