Not exact matches
You hear
people talk about «mansplaining» or «manterruptions,» and we
sort of laugh about them.
I just was
sort of interested and
talked to a lot
of people about what was going on, but I wasn't really interested in looking at the business side
of it, so I never was doing that.
So about two years ago I got
talking to a friend's mother who had inherited Barclays shares, because I am the
sort of nerdy
person who
talks about shares at dinner parties.
People who have left the church because they've gone down some
sort of slippery ethical slope are not the ones
talking about their experiences and sharing with other Christians outside the church or even making it known that they ARE still Christians, but there are a great many Christians who don't go to a formal church service.
I am on your side... this is what i am
talking about — your quickness to anger and jumpiness to get all pumped up... a true peaceful movement is not made up
of people of that
sort, but relaxed calm
people.
Since I was trying to imagine how such a criminal might come to doing such a stupid thing, I tried to make that clear, but you flew right past that and think that I'm some
sort of super-criminal because I was
talking about possibilities and how some
people can react in such a way.
«If
people are
sort of subliminally saying «those Christians are all barking mad», now we're challenging them saying «here we are, this is what I do, this is what I believe in, let's
talk about it, let's see where you differ» and more often than not they'll see the message applies to so many
of us and
people resonate with that.»
Thanks to a grant from the Lilly Endowment, I recently had the chance to spend six months
talking to all
sorts of people about how theology might better connect with Christian laypeople.
Hell to me is eternally without the fellowship
of God - imagine being next to someone who constantly
talks about themselves and does nothing except things that benefit themself (
sort of like the
person who does good to make himself feel better in your previous post), with no cognizance
of my existance - I would hate to be next to that guy for eternity, that would be hell!
Most religious
people I have
talked to, speak about being «saved by the grace
of God» (or some
sort of similar terminology).
In a world where
people see pastors as
people they can't
talk to because the pastors are «holy», separate, and thus would not understand, different
sorts of approaches are sometimes needed.
At the beginning
of the year, when I asked what
sort of people you would like to
talk to via our interview series, one
of the most popular suggestions was to interview Christians who identified with various political parties.
At least where I've interacted,
people just want to hear the same cliches over and over or want some
sort of emotional sermon that «moves» them, a spiritual pep
talk.
For example, although Paul does use first -
person pronouns and the present tense, he did not use this
sort of grammar in Romans 6, the first part
of Romans 7, or on into Romans 8 where it is perfectly clear that Paul is
talking about regenerate
people.
When you let a minority
of people talk on the majority's behalf, labeling them as «representatives» this is the
sort of stupidity that usually comes out.
As far as Glenn
talking smack about Obama's chartiable contributions, let's then
talk about what
sorts of charity
people like the Koch Brothers contribute — all for political gain.
Now that
people in the mainline denominations are starting to
talk unembarrassedly about church growth and evangelism
of a fairly conventional
sort, Wheeler worries that the potential exists for any emphasis on congregational studies to be misinterpreted as an outgrowth
of the spirit
of the times — which views local communities
of believers uncritically, as in - arguably good things, and assumes that if there is anything the matter with them it is that they aren't big enough.
(2) admit that you are
talking to the wall when you are pretending to
talk to «god» (ie there is no god, at least
of the
sort Perry wants
people to pray to).
«For many if not most
of the
people I was coming into contact with in local churches,
talking about their congregation meant citing statistics
of one
sort or another, or details
of particular programs.»
For the last 10 years, I have been doing anthropological and psychological research among experientially oriented evangelicals, the
sort of people who seek a personal relationship with God and who expect that God will
talk back.
«If you
talk to
people who've campaigned around the world for human rights and religious rights, they would say that where we are starting is actually on a path that could lead to the same
sort of regimes that are elsewhere in the world, certainly in terms
of persecution
of Christians,» he said.
I was recently
talking with someone about the violence
of God in the Bible and I pointed out that we Christians have no problem condemning the violence that Allah commands Muslims to carry out in his name... why is it okay for God to tell His
people to carry out that same
sort of violence?
At the beginning
of the year, when I asked what
sort of people you would like to
talk to via our interview series, one
of the most popular suggestions was to interview Christians who identified with certain political parties.
Thirty
people — some professionals from Geneva who can
talk about anything, who have learned to perfection the technique
of this
sort of «consultation.
Amazing sharing
of a personal story, thanx I have seen that when
people make
talking about the god and right belief about their god so central (or even mildly important), this
sort of ugliness is inevitable.
Yes, they may get a subsidy
of some
sort, but they will still be required to PURCHASE it — too many
people that I personally have
talked to seem to think that if this passes, they will get FREE healthcare or health insurance.
They have this thing when you are asleep called a «dream», where
people talk to you and do all
sorts of stuff that is IMAGINARY.
«Certain - seeking faith» is the
sort of faith that
people were trying to exercise in the prayer meeting I just
talked about.
Jewsbury will always be the captain for some
people because he epitomized that
sort of low - key calmness through his craft that rallied
people together, but also would
talk to the ref after every foul to let him know what's up.
This is the
sort of thing Hornsby likes to
talk about with his pro athlete buddies,
people like pitcher Mark Langston, whom he met after a concert in Seattle, where Langston was playing before being traded to Montreal.
With the other top Gunner Mesut Ozil also in
talks over a new contract you would expect the German international and his
people to be looking at a similar
sort of deal to keep them happy as well, but revelations last week showed that such a huge pay rise for two
of the players already on more money than their club colleagues would have put us in a precarious position.
Senior writer Richard Hoffer wrote in SI's 50th Anniversary Issue, in 2003, that sports «evolved from a local flavor to a national appetite... and suddenly, all
sorts of people could
talk to one another, volatile debates defused by a shared passion for sports.»
It's
sort of ironic you're asking me for advice on which advice to take, but that's really the crux
of the issue, for you and almost everyone heading off to college: You want to make the best decision possible so you
talk to as many
people as possible, but after a while, it's easy to fall into the paralysis - from - analysis trap — but then again, maybe the next
person you
talk to will give you the key to unlocking the best decision.
So in the latest thrilling bit
of Arsenal transfer news, if you are the
sort of person who believes in Santa Claus, the tooth fairy or Theo Walcott when he
talks about fighting spirit, we hear in a Sky Sports report from Arsene Wenger the confirmation that the highly sought after Monaco star Kylian Mbappe is one
of our transfer targets.
If I may, I think that for the most part, when women * actively * seek out advice on pregnancy, childbirth, and babycare, they DO
talk to real
people (if they actually know
people in real life who have those
sorts of experiences,
of course).
«She used to sing musical theater loud in the grocery store,» said Scott, when we and the other
people in our foster parent training were
talking about what
sort of strategies we might use to address public tantrums.
The best part about
talking to
people about cloth is that you can give them a little bit
of an education so that you know what
sorts of diapers will work best for their lifestyle.
On the other hand, you
talk a lot about the social support that families need, which a lot
of people associate with the Democrats»
sort of approach to these policies.
By Jillian Lauren «She used to sing musical theater loud in the grocery store,» said Scott, when we and the other
people in our foster parent training were
talking about what
sort of strategies we might use to address public tantrums.
I mean, it's kind
of an absurd thing and it's like, I had this story I used read a lot when I would do presentations and it was from this and I used to just read this
sort of paragraph and
people just with their mouth open because they were
talking about as a mother
sort of emerges from this
sort of hut where she's been isolated and she emerges and she walks toward the village with their baby and they're singing songs to her sung by that they sing for warriors returning from battle, it's a totally different thing than what our moms experience.
The
talks were described as still in the preliminary phase, one
person said, and come as an array
of Democratic officials and allied groups — including de Blasio himself — has threatened to back primary challengers to the five I.D.C. senators unless they agree to some
sort of rapprochement.
Why do you think that being a republic has some
sort of magical power to override the will
of the «overwhelming majority»
of the
people that the question
talks about?
This is a commission that was
talking to all
sorts of people,» Cuomo told reporters after a speech on the economy at the University at Buffalo.
«I want to explain to
people why we would be better off out and we have only got a few months to do it so the less time we spend on that
sort of thing the more time we have to
talk about the issues that matter to
people.»
Seems like a pretty ambiguous law, any foreign national that discusses politics with a US citizen is going to have an influence over the
person they are
talking to, I don't see why campaign donations should be some
sort of separate category in this regard, seems absurd to me.
There's a part early on when the sociopath is
talking with the TV producer about what she wants: she
talks about how crime, especially crime perpetrated by poor
people and minorities on rich or white
people, draws the most attention from viewers, followed by other
sorts of mayhem.
«If you really want to get the reduction
people are
talking about, 80 percent by 2050, it's going to take some
sort of price on carbon to get there,» Thornton said.
This relates to the whole area
of development for
people talking about biofuels, which is this idea
of trying to develop replacements for the conventional
sorts of fossil fuels that we have to at least — if we are going to be burning some
sort of hydrocarbons
of some kind — to try to get them [so] that they are being derived from a different source, and potentially or ideally, ones that would actually burn without delivering as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere too; that's great if you can get that.
And he did it about three or four times; and one time he did it right in the middle
of our
talking about how humans were able to be more, you know, we were more socialized then the other primates and we could,
sort of, we always made an effort to see what was going on in the other
person's mind; you know, this theory
of mind idea.
You could say, «Well to be an objective scientist, you just
talk about what you found,» but that's
sort of a sin
of omission if you don't tell
people why you chose that topic.