The lack of humility, consideration and understanding on her behalf was shocking, and I was really disappointed to find
people supporting her point of view.
Not exact matches
Most
people of faith will only care about the science which
supports their
point of view.
A lot
of people seem to be uncomfortable with mystery to the
point where they are driven to submit what they consider to be absolute proof to
support their
point of view.
Sounds like some
people want to selectively use religion to
support their
points of view.
Furthermore, the entire
point of my post was to show that even though I am a Christian and do not agree with the atheist
view of God (which is to say the idea
of the absense
of God), I STILL
support this soldier in their right to attend the ceremony and NOT have to bow their head, and believe that any Christian or other
person who would force this soldier to do so by threat
of removal from the ceremony, is just plain wrong.
There are a lot
of good
people / companies
of different religions that
support their religion but don't try to subjugate others into their
point of view.
Oh... forgot you Proving... I wasn't referring to what he said... on the surface, it's fine to have a
point of view... whether I agree with it or not... but when you are A) in a position
of influence and B) spending money to fight the opposing
view... and it's to stop two
people who love each other from wedding in the eyes
of their Lord, then it is hate... if your ignorance allows you to think my comments are stupid... so be it... and one last
point about slavery... whether it was Democrats or Republicans who
supported, or fought against slavery... many justified slavery because
of their perverted interpretation
of the bible... most
people can't tell a simple story from one
person to the next... but so many foolish Christians think they know exactly what the bible is saying w / o any doubt... forget the fact that it's been translated and passed for 1000s
of years... yup you must be right that God is against two
people loving each other... He must have made a mistake with those folks huh?
You do such an amazing job
of exploring perspectives without getting antagonistic, and honoring other
people's
point of view while
supporting your own take.
These
people have clearly never seen «Election,» Alexander Payne's brilliant high school comedy that tells its story from multiple
points of view and
supports them all equally.
On the other side, from this
point of view, are those who are «soft»:
people who are opposed to measuring outcomes, who in theory want to empower teachers but in practice want to
support a failing status quo.
Alejandro: «From a technical
point of view, the goal here would be to give those
people the opportunity or the
support, the means to participate in public life, which is a fundamental right, and so far no one thought about it».
Most common pain
points — poor PDF
support, poor organization, no easy way to print, no easy way to get notes off
of the device, no easy note - taking, no writing features — would be easily fixed if one or more eReader companies took a more sensible
view of what eReaders could be, and how other companies and
people could help.
The
point of view is from
people like her — family members and friends who stayed at home to worry and wait, and otherwise
support active - duty servicemen and women, and veterans.
I use it regularly to describe
people, that when faced with data that no longer
supports their own biased
point of view, will turn to global cover - up conspiracy theories in order to preserve their own self - deception.
When the vast majority
of people working in a field
of science accept an important hypothesis, it's a good bet (a practical certainty) that it really is the best
supported point of view on the table.
From a legal
point of view there are two priorities which stand out: Priority 2.3, to «uphold the rights
of people living with mental health problems and illnesses,» which includes recommendations relating to the removal
of barriers to full participation, stopping disclosure
of police apprehensions under mental health acts for «police record checks,» aligning legislation and policies with the UN Convention on the Rights
of Person with Disabilities, moving away from methods
of seclusion and restraint, and
supporting advocacy.
In mediation sessions to resolve child
support conflicts, the two disputing parties are given the opportunity to express their
points of view and provide evidence to a neutral
person trained in dispute resolution.
From the
point for
view of the government, it's much less expensive to
support a frail elderly
person in subsidized housing than in long - term care.