Sentences with phrase «people talk without»

Effective listening skills demonstrated by the ability to listen to other people talk without interruptions, understand them and then propose solutions or make contributions based on the points made

Whether you like going crazy with the same or the opposite sex, we can bet that you've heard a couple of gay people talk without understanding half of their conversation, even if they were talking in perfect English and you could hear them loud and clear.

# PhD not to - do list: Do not check email except after lunch, do not check other websites, do not let people talk without getting to the point, do not attend meetings without agenda,..., you get the point.

If you want to be a truly great leader, «let people talk without interjecting or commenting.

Not exact matches

Without this knowledge, the customer will soon see that they are better off going to the internet for answers, than talking with an ignorant sales person.

This is where a person in a relationship of trust talks another into investing with them and doing so without proper legal documentation or review.

But what people are really talking about is being completely captivated by an obsession that they simply can not imagine conducting their life without.»

«I would say it's important that civilians and police can talk about these things without people running into a panic.

By using software that can talk or chat with people, hackers could conceivably target more people at once without having to actually personally communicate with them and demand payments.

«Talk to people who can relate and will listen without judgment.

Cable news, no matter what channel you're watching, has devolved into putting multiple people onscreen while they see who can talk the loudest and longest without ever recognizing that the person on the other side of the split screen may have a point.

There's a funny video that made the rounds online not long ago about the, «First Person To Run A Marathon Without Talking About It.»

Being able to talk to people such as customers and clients without appearing arrogant is vital.

«Without talking about the reward component, all that is left is risk aversion, and you end up scaring people at a time when investors need to be looking at building income,» he said.

To allow for a freer flow of ideas through media, in a way that does not degrade quality and that elevates conversation and has impact, requires a new mindset: Business people need to be out there talking about what's happening in their industry without making it about themselves, their companies and their product.

Having a website but not knowing how people use it is like talking without listening.

When I used to do a lot of recruiting we used to call it «hanging yourself» because people who talk for long periods of time without seeking feedback are generally not self - aware or good at human interaction.

Soon «I had an accidental paycheck, and I wondered, If I can make $ 700 without trying, how many people could I talk to if I really did try?»

While this might sound like it wastes more time, it actually ends up focusing people by putting them into a positive frame of mind to tackle issues and talk metrics without turning into an unproductive, repetitious «round robin of complaints.»

Without good listeners, people do not talk freely and the flow of communication is seldom set in motion.

If enough people simply talk about your brand in the context of things you talk about on your website — without linking to your pages — Google still gives you popularity points.

The talks continued until March of 2016, ending without a deal due to the difficulty of blending the technology underpinning each company's approach, said one of the people, who asked not to be identified as the discussions were private.

Iran will attend talks with fellow OPEC members and Russia in Qatar next month without joining their proposal to freeze crude oil production, according to a person familiar with the Continue Reading

Most of the people I talked to were concerned about market complacency; and even if they were bullish, which many of them were, they were surprised that we've gone this long without a correction.

You can not pick up a newspaper, turn on the news, watch a TV show or talk with other people these days without regularly hearing the bad stuff that happens in the world.

When people talk about the American Dream, it's hard to do so without thinking about debt.

You can now invest small amounts online in private companies (or even in people) without leaving your house, writing a check, or even talking to anyone from the company.

@ jack3 no you have the right to believe what ever you want, but we might mock you for believing in something that has talking snakes, a story about the world flooding and being able to fit all the animals on the planet on one boat, that believes in magic, that believes a person lived in the belly of a whale, and that people coexisted with dinosaurs all without any actual proof.

Science is the hard work of people who actually care and want to find better solutions to the problems and ills in our lives, without convincing themselves that somebody higher is going to offer the solutions simply because they talk to that dark void.

I listed a website and without one iota of care you somehow think you know better than those people??? Talk about arrogance.

I can talk to anyone now without any kind of, «Oh my gosh, I'm talking to this person.»

I find it interesting how mega-church prosperity teachers want to talk about the very early days of the church of mega-crowds — without talking about their scattering — and how the persecuted church grew in people's homes and catacombs (I like the rhyme) for the next 300 years — until Constantine — the true father of many mega-church ministries.

Neither the «straight white males with book deals» dividing the bounty nor the people who don't seem to be able to talk about anything without having to trash straight white males can hold my attention for very long I'm afraid.

I also benefit from the fact that I can talk with my mouth full without people attributing my behavior to the «uncivilized» nature of my class.

It would seem, therefore, that we can understand historically why persons find themselves talking in this context without supposing that they are forced to do so by the nature of things or by their apprehension of God as the cause of finite beings.

If I decided the World started 4,000 years ago with one man, one woman and a dancing bear, people would rightly consider me a fool, but give me a white collar and black robes and change it to 6,000 years, one man, one woman and a talking snake, and all of a sudden I'm believed without question.

i hate people who just talk without an understanding of the subject they're talking about.

All verses like this and Matthew 5:28 (where Jesus talks about adultery in a similarly harsh manner, are meant to do is point us straight to verses of Paul's such as Romans 3:23 and Ephesians 2:8 - 9: it's the evidence Jesus provides that, no matter what, even if we never murder a single person or in any way commit adultery, we're nothing without Him... and, oh, yeah, it's the meter that shows us who we are and why we need Him, and only Him (John 14:6), to get to heaven.

but I guess watching the kardashians, or jersey shore is alot more educational, If I was forced to watch any of that junk, I would choose this one, at least they can get your attention without having to get naked and spread their legs all over town just to make a buck... these people got over 1 Million watching and talking about the show without showing their skin, just by showing how they actually live in a country where some IDIOTS are trying to teach us if someone looks different or acts different than us we should be scared of them and they are out to kill us.

Hell to me is eternally without the fellowship of God - imagine being next to someone who constantly talks about themselves and does nothing except things that benefit themself (sort of like the person who does good to make himself feel better in your previous post), with no cognizance of my existance - I would hate to be next to that guy for eternity, that would be hell!

Here's a list of things we should test... 1) Worldwide floods 2) Seas parting at the command of a person 3) talking snakes, donkeys, and bushes 4) People spontaneously turning into pillars of salt 5) a few loaves of bread and some wine feeding thousands 6) instantaneous healing of disease 7) worlds forming in 6 days 8) words forming on stone tablets without the assistance of a living creature 9) people walking on water 10) resurrection on cPeople spontaneously turning into pillars of salt 5) a few loaves of bread and some wine feeding thousands 6) instantaneous healing of disease 7) worlds forming in 6 days 8) words forming on stone tablets without the assistance of a living creature 9) people walking on water 10) resurrection on cpeople walking on water 10) resurrection on command

A debate in which the thoughts are not expressed in the way in which they existed in the mind but in the speaking are so pointed that they may strike home in the sharpest way, and moreover without the men that are spoken to being regarded in any way present as persons; a conversation characterized by the need neither to communicate something, nor to learn something, nor to innuence someone, nor to come into connexion with someone, but solely by the desire to have one's own self - reliance confirmed by making the impression that is made, or if it has become unsteady to have it strengthened; a friendly chat in which each regards himself as absolute and legitimate and the other as relativized and questionable; a lovers» talk in which both partners alike enjoy their own glorious soul and their precious experience — what an underworld of faceless spectres of dialogue!

Without question the larger problem today is for persons in secular roles — especially politicians — to engage in God talk.

And you are talking, in the main, to people who proudly claim to accept nothing without proof (or maybe nothing extraordinary without extraordinary proof).

Once more we understand that this classification divides mankind, or rather reminds us of a division that exists in reality: a division into the active ones and the sufferers, so that when the talk is about willing to do all, we may think about the suffering which this act may entail without calling such a man a sufferer, since he actually is an active person.

Oh, please, «musings» and the other nitwit who replied... I am talking about a professional who dragged her baby around as a statement - at WORK - and purposely nursed the child - without trying to cover anything - in front of people in order to make them uncomfortable.

Not as a scientist, but as an ordinary person, without scientific pretensions, talking about what we all experience, I feel, listen, and look.

This shouldn't be about people — a lot of people can be wrong in their theology (and I think to a certain degree we all are still learning)-- can't we talk about theology without it being offensive to either side?

«I'm trying out a new idea for how I can talk about values with poor people without coming across as Lady Bountiful.

It's time to give people the space and freedom to talk openly about depression without stigma, without shame, and without embarrassment.