Not exact matches
The theory is that giving
people money would be more efficient and allow them more autonomy
than the
current system.
Ultimately,
people will gravitate towards closed rather
than open primaries in my view: (i) open primaries would need state involvement so are a deeper proposition (you need to run them concurrently and they would be too costly for the parties if done properly); (ii) vested interests may well prevail if the proposed reform is not building on the
current system (as indeed they have in the Tory party where they experimented with this quarter - heartedly).
Dr Osei believes revenue collection is inefficient and said strengthening the country's
current systems to boost tax collection should be considered rather
than increasing taxes, which, he feels, will be a disincentive for
people to invest.
This is not really relevant to my answer as what I am proposing is tied to making
current political
system more accessible / transparent to average
person, rather
than getting into what
people decide.
Proponents, however, predict that even more
people will work, because the
current welfare
system actively discourages welfare receivers from taking small jobs (if you make less money per month
than you get welfare, that money is subtracted from welfare, so you end up with the same amount of income whether you work or not) and that the reason for unemployment is rather lack of jobs
than lack of
people's motivation to take them.
A survey used to back up the society's recommendations shows 41 % of
people think a publicly - funded political
system would be fairer
than the
current system.
Compared with the
current system, the Browne report would halve monthly repayments for
people on median incomes (and cut them by even more for those on lower
than median incomes).
I'm far more interested in charting a better way forward
than in pointing fingers, and as I have made clear, I have no interest in impugning the motives of the
people responsible for the
current system.
Some offenses that affect public safety warrant stronger measures
than others, but prisons are full of
persons who probably would be better rehabilitated in some other
system than our
current one.
It's not a perfect
system (you may notice some levels are harder or easier
than the
current mode suggests, and are only present in that mode because relatively few
people have played them), but for the most part it works.
A lot of the
systems design that
people are looking at — like Christopher Clack — even if you can get the renewables up to 80 percent, then you have a piece there probably natural gas «peakers» [power plants that run in periods of high electricity demand], at least based on
current technology, are way cheaper
than any [energy] storage.
Even many of those
people who excel want to give more back to the country
than they have to under the
current system.
It seems to me that our problem has a lot less to do with the mechanics of solar power
than the politics of human power — specifically whether there can be a shift in who wields it, a shift away from corporations and toward communities, which in turn depends on whether or not the great many
people who are getting a rotten deal under our
current system can build a determined and diverse enough social force to change the balance of power.
If one says any length of time that rules out the prospect of seeing the change in our lifetimes then that
person is saying that Natural Variability [otherwise known as our
current state of knowledge of the climate
system] is a lot stronger [more unknown]
than any of the known and supposed forcings and feedbacks currently postulated.
In a recent New York Times op - ed, President of the Ford Foundation Darren Walker critiqued America's
current culture of unpaid internships — which he believes creates a
system where «contacts and money matter more
than talent [and] contributes to an economy in which access and opportunity go to the
people who already have the most of both.»
Lord Justice Briggs» Civil Court Structure Review proposed the new online court and said it would improve access to justice and be simpler for
people to use
than the
current court
system.
Because then
people shopping for a personal injury lawyer wouldn't be fooled into believing that the
current personal injury delivery
system is guided by professional and ethical standards rather
than the unbridled drive for ever - greater profit.
The «Defend Innovation» whitepaper is the culmination of two - and - a-half years worth of research, drawing from the stories, expertise, and ideas of more
than 16,500
people who agree that the
current patent
system is broken.
One facet that many
people don't realize about mesh Wi - Fi
systems is that they're meant to replace your
current router, rather
than work alongside it.
It is clear from the report that the
current system of detention in the Northern Territory is failing our children and young
people, leaving many more damaged
than when they entered.