Sentences with phrase «people under this premise»

But it's reckless to dismiss all trans people under this premise.

Not exact matches

I don't know the total number killed in the Netherlands during the revolt, but I know at least a thousand people were executed by the council after they had the counts of Egmont and Horne decapitated; they were Catholic nobles loyal to the King of Spain, but were executed under the premise that their tolerance for Protestantism was treasonous behavior.

It's a little too late for praying, it's Mrs.Clinton's call to be @ the helm; now, with her hubby Mr.Clinton as VP; and one of you out of all of you, need to tell Romney he's committed fraud, for leaving the Post of so - called gov.that theirs a 2 yr.interval that must be met; the same fo Obama; whom is worst off then Bush Jr.then for none of you to have no Allegiance to be nothing but commander of thieves, since April 4th, 1968 to presently; in the killing of Dr.King Jr.must still go under Oath to all you perjurers; that mustn't go unpunished to the array of charges I have stored up against each of yo on every job, on every public premise; that Obama didn't praywhen he lied to GOD ALMIGHTY in perjury; to have left the seat of sen.to jump to the office; knowing he hadn't a clue what to do; so he got Joe, which is Cheney all over; whom should of been out of public; and he knows that and all the fugitives, even in the Italian led court in DC; that will have to answer to what is -LCB- H.R. 7152 -RCB-; and why they let Olsen for Bush Jr.waste the American's People's time, not to mention all the lives that's been lost; for the tyrannies since 1968 to presently has cost; Vote I, Edward Baltimore; to confirm I; Governor of DC; as of 2/16/12; cause DC; has been a State, already; and all you slaves from State to State; need to snap out of your peonage which is prohibited by Federal Laws; on anybody!!!!!!!

I say this to: 1) refute the stupidity of the people still operating under the premise that Dantonio and Izzo covered anything up.

«We believe America was founded on the premise of uniting people from different countries, religions, and colors, and we welcome diversity under the enlightened understanding that it is not a weakness but rather our greatest strength.

The new Local Law makes it unlawful for establishments to: purchase any articles, jewelry or precious metals from any person under the age of 18; sell, dispose of, destroy, alter or remove from premises any articles for 14 days, (or 30 days if requested by law enforcement); and bars employment to anyone who has been convicted of a felony in the past 3 years.

; Patrick Akpolobolokemi, the former NIMASA Director - General was rough - handled and bundled into a van right in front of the court premises where a judge had just granted him bail; several persons are known to have been detained for periods far in excess of the constitutionally mandated 48 hours initially under spurious detention orders signed by magistrates courts in the Federal Capital Territtory!

«Reports that reached us from Oshiomhole's area in Edo North indicated that under - age voters and persons without voter cards were not allowed to get into the premises of the polling station by security men.

A court case filed by a large PPL dating site in the USA under a bogus pretence (which had been thrown out of the court and EM's legal expenses were ordered to be compensated, that's how preposterous was the premise).

They work under the premise that ambition and drive are traits that successful people also want to find in a potential partner.

Occupy Oakland is going crazy trying to move into a building and take it over as their headquarters (under the premise of turning it into a community center for the 99 %)... what are these people still protesting about and why do they resort to violence and criminal activity?

With that said, I strongly agree with your overall premise that a person's worst financial problem is often their consumption habits — which is typically a harbinger of debt — and using debt is an individual's choice and when they make the commitment, they can get it under control.

Occupy Oakland is going crazy trying to move into a building and take it over as their headquarters (under the premise of turning it into a community center for the 99 %)... what are these people still protesting about and why do they resort to violence and -LSB-...]

However, according to Regulation 29, «the licensee of a food establishment or private market may permit any guide dog accompanying a blind or visually impaired person to be brought into the dining or refreshment area or any toilet of the licensed premises if the guide dog is a) kept under proper control; b) restrained from straying or causing annoyance or nuisance to any person or animal, or damage to any property; and c) held in a leash.»

Anesthetic agents must be administered by a veterinarian or by persons trained in their administrations and then only under the supervision of a veterinarian who is on the premises.

[FN135] However, in another section the county defines «at large» as (1) «a dog off the owner's premises, not under a person's control by means of leash, cord or chain...»; or (2) «a cat which does not exhibit identification by a collar and a current county rabies license tag.»

Basic point being, these are people collectively operate in the realm of «climate change sociology» under the unsupportable premise that man - caused global warming is settled science, thus it is up to them to explain to the rest of us what's wrong with the mindset of skeptic climate scientists....

Facebook and the UK government have been, under warrant, searching the CA premises, and the end result so far is that people's privacy and the future of data sharing on Facebook is in doubt.

Where a person has been arrested for an indictable (formerly an arrestable) offence, s 18 (1) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984), as amended by the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, empowers the police to enter and search any premises «occupied or controlled» by the person under arrest where the relevant officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting that he will find on the premises evidence relating to the indictable offence for which the person has been arrested, or evidence relating to some other indictable offence which is connected with or similar to that offence.

Under this section, a purveyor of goods and services can submit to the Canadian Human Rights Commission a plan to adapt any services, facilities, premises, operations, or equipment to meet the needs of disabled persons.

Despite this laudable goal, the law raises several red flags under the Charter: it appears overbroad both in its sphere of application (it applies not only to bars, but all licenced premises) and targets for removal (including not only gang members, but persons who support or facilitate gangs, or persons in the company of any of those persons).

If someone is injured owing to the existence of the dangerous condition on the premises then that person can sue the owner for damages under the Occupier Liability Act in BC.

Under premises liability law, building owners are accountable for providing safe conditions for people visiting for business or social reasons.

Compounding the risk for landlords under s. 57 is that if, within one year after the tenant vacates the rental unit, the designated person fails to occupy the rental unit within a reasonable period of time and the landlord lists the rental unit for rent; or enters into a tenancy agreement with another person; or advertises the rental unit or the building that contains the rental unit for sale; or demolishes the rental unit or the building containing the rental unit; or «takes any step to convert the rental unit or the building containing the rental unit» to a use other than residential premises; then, the landlord is «presumed, unless the contrary is proven on a balance of probabilities,» to have acted in bad faith in giving the notice and is therefore liable to the penalties provided for in s. 57 (3).

Which means, a slip and fall victim has to gather witness testimony, video evidence, documentary evidence, and the like, — evidence that can be admitted under Florida's rules of civil procedure — in order to have a valid injury claim under Florida law (even though Florida Statute 768.0755 does not affect any common - law duty of care owed by a person or entity in possession or control of a business premises).

Slip and fall accidents are often classified under a broad category of personal injury cases known as premises liability claims since the «incident» occurred in the premises or the property owned or maintained by another person or an organization.

Premises must be occupied or controlled by the person under arrest if a search under PACE, s 18 is to be lawful.

Section 1 (1)(t)(i) defines «tenant» as meaning «a person who is permitted by the landlord to occupy residential premises under a residential tenancy agreement.»

Negligent security laws fall under general premises liability, which is that a business has a duty to protect people they invite onto the property and keep them safe.

Under the Occupiers Liability Act, individuals and entities that are «occupying» property in British Columbia owe a duty of reasonable care to all people who come onto their premises, whether as a customer, an invited guest, or a permitted passerby.

Section 18 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 can only properly be used where the premises are occupied or controlled by the person under arrest.

The landlord must apply to the court by filing a written notice to the clerk or application to the RTDRS describing the premises, the remedy requested, and an affidavit (This is a statement, made under oath, that the person who makes the statement swears is true.

Under the Occupiers» Liability Act in Ontario, ski resorts are allowed to restrict, modify or exclude their duty to ensure that people entering their premises are reasonably safe.

Under common law principles, a licensee is a person who enters the premises with the landowner's express or implied permission for his or her own purposes rather than for the landowner's benefit.

If alcohol is sold on the premises, the stadium owner or operator may be subject to some liability for injuries caused by intoxicated people under the state's Liquor Control Act, 235 ILCS 5/6-21.

The London Borough of Croydon formed the view that the borough was «experiencing a significant and persistent problem caused by anti-social behaviour; that some or all of the private sector landlords who have let premises in the area (whether under leases or licences) are failing to take action to combat the problem that it would be appropriate for them to take; and that making a designation will, when combined with other measures taken in the area by the local housing authority, or by other persons together with the local housing authority, lead to a reduction in, or the elimination of, the problem»: section 80 (6) of the 2004 Act.

Regardless of whether the crime victim is a student, a teacher, a professor, member of the school staff, or a visitor, under Florida law (specifically Florida premises liability negligent security law), the college or university will be responsible for damages to that victim of crime if evidence reveals that the attack was proximately caused by the college or university failing to exercise reasonable care in protecting people from harm by a third party (criminal).

(ii) a person who is permitted to occupy residential premises under an assignment or sublease of a residential tenancy agreement to which the landlord has consented under section 22, and

(b) that, subject to section 23 [about the landlord's ability to enter the tenant's premises], neither the landlord nor a person having a claim to the premises under the landlord will in any significant manner disturb the tenant's possession or peaceful enjoyment of the premises; (emphasis added)

Section 8 - 1801 (a)(1)(A) defines «at large» as follows: «The term «animal at large» means any animal found off the premises of its owner and neither leashed nor otherwise under the immediate control of a person capable of physically restraining it.»

An «occupier» is defined in the legislation as including «(a) a person who is in physical possession of premises; or (b) a person who has responsibility for and control over the condition of premises or the activities there carried on, or control over persons allowed to the premises...» An occupier's duty of care under the legislation is as follows: «An occupier of premises owes a duty to take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that persons entering on the premises, and the property brought on the premises by those persons are reasonably safe while on the premises.»

The key part of the definition is clause (i), defining a «tenant» as a «person who is permitted by the landlord to occupy residential premises under a residential tenancy agreement.»

Under the Occupier's Liability Act, an «occupier» is a person in physical possession of the premises, or a person who has responsibility for and control over the condition of the premises or the activities there carried on, or finally, control over persons allowed to enter the premises.

It is alleged that on September 22, 2009, a young person under your care and custody... took unlawful possession of merchandise from the Retailer's premises [in] Vernon, BC.

Slip and fall accidents are covered under premises liability law, which governs cases associated with injuries occurring on another person's property.

In addition, we clarify that if the assigned work station of persons under contract is on the covered entity's premises and such persons perform a substantial proportion of their activities at that location, the covered entity may choose to treat them either as business associates or as part of the workforce, as explained in the discussion of the definition of business associate.

TCEA 2007 permits CRAR to be used after a lease has ended in relation to sums which fell due before the expiry of the lease, but only in limited circumstances, namely: - where control of the goods in question was taken before the expiry of the lease; or - all the following are satisfied: - the lease did not end by forfeiture; - not more than six months have passed since the lease came to an end; - the rent is due from the person who was the tenant at the end of the lease; - that person remains in possession of the premises; and - any new lease under which they remain in possession is a lease of commercial premises and the landlord remains the same.

The appellant sued the respondents alleging negligence, breach of duty of care, and breach of their duty under s. 3 (1) of the Occupiers» Liability Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O. 2, to «take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that persons entering on the premises, and the property brought on the premises by those persons are reasonably safe while on the premises.»

(ii) a property manager who acts as agent for the owner of the residential premises and any other person who, as agent for the owner, permits the occupation of the residential premises under a residential tenancy agreement,

A remedy available following illegal re-entry of premises by persons evicted under a warrant of possession.