Short
people use less energy, take up less space and have a smaller carbon footprint.
If
people use less energy (through efficiency and conservation) and shift to lower - carbon energy sources, demand for high - carbon energy will decline and it won't be economical to go chasing after unconventional fuels.
Not exact matches
A second reason is that (so the planners believe) urban life
uses less energy than suburban life, because
people walk instead of drive, etc..
In the
less developed countries, approximately 400 pounds of grain per year is available to the average
person, nearly all of which must be consumed directly merely to meet minimal food
energy needs... Contrast this example to the average North American who
uses nearly a ton of grain per year.
This view of the world assumes that only a limited amount of
energy is available; consequently, if one country's citizens
use more, the
people of other countries will have
less.
The government has created an online Global Calculator to help
people understand how their lifestyles and
energy use impact on the climate — and which underlines the importance of eating
less meat.
less than or equal to lamivudine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Antiretroviral therapy, usually means 1 - 2 drugs,
used in early studies Antiretroviral zidovudine (also known as ZDV) Breastfeeding Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative Breastfeeding and HIV International Transmission Study Combined antiretroviral therapy Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Deoxyribonucleic Acid Exclusive Breastfeeding Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Food and Agrigulture Organization Fixed dose combination ART, e.g., lamividine, stavudine, and nevirapine Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy, 3 or more drugs for more effective treatment
used in later studies Human Immunodeficiency virus International Atomic
Energy Agency Infant feeding Infant and young child feeding Lopinavir cubic millimetre Mother - to - Child Transmission of HIV Non-governmental organization Nevirapine Polymerase Chain Reaction
People Living with HIV Prevention of Mother - to - Child Transmission Replacement Feeding Ritonavir Ribonucleic acid, one of the three major macromolecules (along with DNA and proteins) that are essential for all known forms of life single dose NVP United Nations Agencies Joint United Nations Programme on HIV / AIDS United Nations Population Fund United Nations Commissioner for Refugees United Nations Children's Fund U.S. Agency for International Development World Alliance for Breastfeeding Action United Nations World Food Programme World Health Assembly WHO 2010 Guidelines on HIV and infant feeding World Health Organization Zidovudine (same drug as AZT)
Government must ensure that all Green Deal compliant measures pay the lower 5 % rate of VAT as it is perverse to charge 5 % tax on a product, i.e.
energy, that we want
people to
use less of, but 20 % on the measures which help them stop
using it.»
She said it seems like a hollow ordinance and that education, advocacy and incentivizing
people to throw away
less would be a better
use of
energy than «heavy - handed» enforcement.
Using a simple alternator, six hours of pedaling can create and store enough electrical
energy in batteries to light about six homes for 30 days (in areas where
people use less electricity than in the U.S.).
Terahertz radiation is also low
energy, so if they are
used to scan
people, the waves are
less dangerous than x-rays or microwaves.
• Abundant,
less expensive natural gas would lower
energy prices across the board, leading
people to
use more
energy overall.
Getting U.S. manufacturers to come up with ways to keep
people cool while
using less HFCs and
energy could spur other nations to act.
However, even after years of growth to 2035, China will still
use less energy per
person than countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), suggests the agency.
The body will take longer to process these more complex fats, and will also
use more
energy on them making them
less effective for providing
people with the boost they need.
Also,
people tend to be more insulin resistant in the morning; insulin is
less effective at bringing sugar to the cells to
use for
energy.
Like you had
energy, you may have been stressed, you may have been anxious but you had the
energy, you know, behind you to do all the things that you needed to do, and then at some point, it started to teeter out where, you know, you're having
less energy, you're feeling more fatigue, you need more naps, you need more time sleeping, you spend more time resting on the weekend, and most
people when we do a detail history, we see that pattern kind of unfolding and we progress, that's called stage 1 — again, depending on what lab you
use, there's a lab called Diagnos - Techs out of Washington, they have like a 7 phases of adrenal fatigue — I like keeping things really simple.
They're not all green
energy, due to the minerals that go into the electronics that most
people prefer to read their eBooks on, but because they are meant to be
used many times over, their impact is drastically
less than that of print books.
These devices» screens
use much
less energy, and many
people find them easier to read, so there will be folks who will be viewing your beautiful, fully saturated snapshot as if it were being displayed on a 1984 Macintosh.
Using videos to meet your readers takes far
less time and
energy as you can meet with all of them at once, provide 3 different sessions to meet more
peoples availability, and offer the replay free online for those who can't make it.
For instance, if more effective cars only
use 70 % of fuel, the portion of fossil sources for
energy use is adjusted down to 80 %, smart planning and collaboration results in 4
people in each car (say 30 %), and a «smart» organization of the working week means
less commuting (80 %; TGIT), then combined effect of this can in theory give a reduction by 0.7 x 0.8 x 0.3 x 0.8 = 0.13.
The increasing proliferation of these tools has the potential to raise awareness among environmentally - minded
people and perhaps bring pressure to bear upon utilities to
use more renewable
energy sources (or at least
less coal mined from the tops of mountains!)
For example, 50 percent of the available
energy is
used by
less than a billion
people, whereas its negative impacts on the environmental affect three billion
people who do not have access to it.
«
Use less stuff, reuse the stuff we have, and change
people's expectation that they have the right to an ever - increasing amount of luxury
energy - expenditure.»
That money could be shifted to incentives for
people to
use their feet, bicycles, or smaller autos in their daily journies to work; incentives to make homes and workplaces more
energy efficient; incentives to shift future land developments into in - fill projects rather than urban sprawl; and incentives to make cities more friendly to pedestrians and
less friendly to cars.
The access devices
use about 95 %
less energy than a regular PC — roughly 1 - 4 watts per device — and with the potential of as many as 30
people all
using just an access device and shared PC, that means some intense
energy savings.
While this is all very interesting, and shows more foresight than many ideas of what we should to make our future better, it leaves out the most obvious part of the solution:
Use less stuff, reuse the stuff we have, and change
people's expectation that they have the right to an ever - increasing amount of luxury
energy - expenditure.
But lets finish up this little homage to the humble «treadly» (as Australians fondly call them) with words from that radical philosopher, Ivan Illich:» [A
person...] on a bicycle can go three or four times faster than the pedestrian, but
uses five times
less energy in the process.
We have to rebuild our cities to
use less energy and house more
people, and Passivhaus design is a useful tool for both problems.
But Mark Lynas, a climate change writer in favour of
using nuclear and renewables to combat global warming, said: «It is stretching credibility for the IPCC to suggest that a richer world with two billion more
people will
use less energy in 2050.
For example, solar photovoltaic (PV) cells convert sunlight directly into
energy that
people can
use, much like bioenergy, but with greater efficiency and
less water
use.
A tax Cap - and - trade can only work by raising the price of lower - priced hydrocarbon fuels, so that
people are forced either to
use higher - priced alternatives or to
use less energy.
NCSE isn't composed of scientists or science teachers; it's an activist group devoted, in part, to expounding global warming alarmists» dogma: Humans are causing climate change; the results will be catastrophic; and governments must force
people to
use less energy and live simpler to prevent future disasters.
Over time, this continually rising price provides an incentive for
people and businesses to
use less and find alternatives: Anyone who can lower their fuel usage and / or
energy consumption, pays
less tax.
The basic options are to have individuals consume
less, consume things that require
less energy,
use energy sources that have lower ‐ carbon content, or have fewer
people.
Mr Cameron's senior
energy adviser pours scorn on claims by Chris Huhne, the Energy Secretary, that rises in gas and oil prices will be offset by people using less
energy adviser pours scorn on claims by Chris Huhne, the
Energy Secretary, that rises in gas and oil prices will be offset by people using less
Energy Secretary, that rises in gas and oil prices will be offset by
people using less power.
Sound design of the revenue side of carbon tax legislation will also ensure that
people of limited means, who
use less energy than average, are made better off, not worse.
[M] any
people have latched onto the local - food movement, billing themselves «locavores,» as an antidote to the
energy used to transport food long distances and the
energy intensity of large - scale industrialized agriculture... Strangely enough, shipping food thousands of miles can sometimes require
less energy, emit
less carbon dioxide and do
less environmental damage.
The equation tells us that if we wanted to lower CO2 we could (1) kill
people, or (2) starve them, or (3) convert fossil fuels to
energy more efficiently (with
less CO2 produced), or (4)
use non-fossil
energy sources.
The above is from the
Energy Saving Trust, a # 60million a year UK government - funded organisation, designed to «help» people to use less e
Energy Saving Trust, a # 60million a year UK government - funded organisation, designed to «help»
people to
use less energyenergy.
And it is sad that you haven't even read the article to understand how this option is good for all of us — to grow our economy while creating cleaner air, and putting money in citizens» pockets to encourage
people to conserve and
use less energy.
Somehow, not
using energy turned into the «ethical» thing to do — the
less you
use, the better
person you are.
No
less by the very
people (climate scientists included) who hide behind their claims they accept the science of climate change and the urgent need for immediate actions which must include changes to Laws and Regulations directly related to
energy production and
use.
In fact, the average resident of Manhattan
uses much
less energy, and has a much smaller carbon footprintAmount of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that a
person, community, industry, or other entity contributes to the atmosphere through
energy use, transportation, and other means.
As a result the scenario features more than 9 billion
people enjoying a much higher GDP than today's 7 billion in 2050 while
using less energy not just per capita, but overall.
We hope to leverage the power in numbers and inspire more and more
people to step up and make meaningful lifestyle changes; from
using less energy to building a more equitable economy.
But let's not kid anyone — the price of fossil fuel based
energy has to rise dramatically in order to encourage
people to
use less of it.
From the promotion of how important it is for young
people to vote in U.S. elections to ad series like Break the Addiction where MTV encourages their viewers to find ways to
use less fossil fuels and
energy, the brand is strong.
EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson — who testified about the partnership before Congress — said the idea is that these goals would wind up emphasizing developments that
use less land and
energy, provide affordable housing to
people of all income and stages of life, make it easier for
people to get to their destinations on foot, bike or public transit and direct growth to developed areas.
«I educate
people, not only to make homes safer, but they'll
use a lot
less energy and help our country and world be a better place.»