Sentences with phrase «people vote for candidate»

There are several other reasons people vote for a candidate or party ahead of simply voting for a candidate who would fight for the issues they most hold dear.

If I understand it correctly, people vote for candidate and the winner of that state primaries will have all votes of pledged delegates?

Overall, if 60 % of people vote for candidates from Party A, Party A should finish up with around 60 % of the seats.

In 1968, people voted for candidates other than Lyndon Johnson in the early Democratic primaries.

Its bad when people vote for a candidates simply because they recognise the name.all the more reason not too

«People vote for candidates based on the issues, how they are going to help the community, not the race of the candidates,» Benjamin said.

While this is understandable, the situation is a bit like people voting for a candidate whose policies will actually hurt them in the long run.

Not exact matches

Overall, the campaign organization's website struck Linda Pophal of Strageic Communications, LLC, as «a recruitment tool,» for paid staff, as opposed to something to encourage people to vote for the candidate.

If, for any reason, any of the nominees is not available as a candidate for director, the persons named as proxy holders will vote your proxy for such other candidate or candidates as may be nominated by the board of directors.

Anything but accept the fact that their candidate wasn't what the people wanted to vote for.

Speaking to 1,000 people at the sold out conference, Broadbent called on delegates to seize this «once - in - a-generation opportunity for progressive change, an opportunity to ensure we have a fair voting system in which every voter counts, in which every citizen has a real opportunity to elect a candidate according to his or her values.

Craft - Brewery Tours Are Hot Political Photo - Ops It's been said that people will often vote for the candidate they'd most like to have a beer with.

Harvey went on to use other candidates ages and health conditions as to why he was a better person to vote for such as one candidate being 65 and being diabetic.

Political pundits say that people vote for the party, the party leader and the local candidate in that order of priority.

The people who are furious about the closure of the Edmonton City Centre Airport or annoyed about the funding of the Art Gallery of Alberta are unlikely to vote for the same candidate as the people angry over the Capital Power - Epcor decision.

Many of the ads linked to Russian operatives did not call for people to vote for a specific candidate.

Jesus sees no virtue in Clinton supporters dismissing swaths of people as racists and misogynists because they plan to vote for a candidate who displays some of those qualities.

I'm voting for Romney, he is by far the smartest and most business savvy person of all the candidates.

While the people quoted within the article offer far more nuanced perspectives, the headline betrays a common but reductive sentiment — that people who vote for pro-choice candidates are voting for abortions.

And so we get silly people voting for third party candidates when they should be out trying to change the system.

But let's be serious, voters are ppl... ppl that have to relate with the candidates at some level or why vote for them?

You also have people who can register as a specfic party and run on a ticket to strengthen their careers and yet they only espouse one or two things that could count them into the party in the first place.There's also a huge issue of people really thinking that a vote for a 3rd party candidate is a waste, If the only way you feel your vote matters is by voting for one of 2 parties (even if you are unsatisfied with both) does it actually matter?

This a strategy to take attention away from the other candidates, in the hopes that people do not vote for Ron Paul.

There are enough people in this country who will blindly vote for whichever candidate comes off as the most devout that it makes it worth their while to court that block.

Primarily, however, it is the television industry itself that has been driven by attempts to develop theories and practices which would bring about certain predictable kinds of behavior — to get people to buy a particular brand, to prefer one product over another, to vote for a particular candidate, and so on.

So which of these presidential candidates ever say Jesus.Do you think Jesue is going to say to them how many people did you get to vote for you?

While the number of people who say they wouldn't vote for an atheist candidate sits at 70 % among Republicans, that number drops to 42 % among Democrats.

By nature, the present President of America has that element in him — I should not be saying this but I am being inherently made to convey this as comment of exception for America and for Obama whose whole (Obama and his better half) stand as an extension through the ex Presidential candidate's Charisma Of the Secretary Hillary Clinton that President Obama's Charisma has selflessly absorbed for function in the cabinet gracefully for America and the world.That shows the humbleness of President Obama and maturity of Hillary Clinton of acceptance without a feeling of high and low of ego regarded as exceptional in Divinity.I was not supposed to make this comment and I have done so to urge the Republicans to accept their Light within of consensus through individual projections under control as Obama's gesture of bipartisanship that will come to address.In short, this comment is all about health and health care where economics alone does not come into the picture with a rigorous analysis on it but should also extend as leverage to the person in play (Obama) who is also selflessly poised with corrections on it over the infra structure of it that he has proposed for approval as ego of his working element as the executive public ally chosen as the President that had appealed to the public at large voting even putting behind able dleaers like McCain?George W Bush was the last to steer America into the Light over the past of America and that stands as the subtle truth even today as on date with Bill Clinton the ex President of America giving support through his excellent independent caliber for Obama ultimately to head the show of America that was time bound of its reality that sees no barriers and to which he accepted well in his individual capacity as the free lance ex President of America.

I'm a Mormon myself and it's really encouraging to hear more people take the same stance you are taking — vote for or against a candidate based on their platform, their record, etc..

With just one day to go until the General election, Premier spoke with Christian candidates about why people should vote for their party.

The weird thing to me is that you can say all this stuff, which you know is a bunch of lies, just in the hope that other people will believe them and vote for the candidate you prefer, and then you will go to church on Sunday without any sense of wrong - doing.

Yes we indeed supports Republican candidate for this reason until now, that the Tea Party (haters of President Obama) came in, with some look warm Christian joined, they were so strong, they voted out the person as a true Christian that I thought would be the next Christian Presidential Candidate for Recandidate for this reason until now, that the Tea Party (haters of President Obama) came in, with some look warm Christian joined, they were so strong, they voted out the person as a true Christian that I thought would be the next Christian Presidential Candidate for ReCandidate for Republican.

Here are some details about that November 2004 ballot proposal: 1) there was already in place a Utah law strictly banning same - sex marriage, which I fully supported; 2) all three candidates for the office of attorney general of Utah (the chief law - enforcement officer in the state) opposed the amendment, including the LDS (Mormon) Republican incumbent, Mark Shurtleff, mostly because they considered it a poorly drafted amendment; 3) I refused to endorse the amendment, but I did not urge people to vote «no»; 4) the leadership of the LDS Church, which has a record for being as strongly opposed to same - sex marriage as the Catholic Church, did not issue a statement urging its members to vote one way or the other; 5) inasmuch as two thirds of Utahans belong to the LDS Church, this means that the leadership of at least 80 percent of Utah churchgoers did not urge a «yes» vote on the amendment.

Yes, I know people do not really vote for the VP candidate, but for the front - runner.

The more candidates a voter has to consider, the less likely a voter is to make an informed decision about any of those candidates and the harder it is for the media to communicate information about the people who represent the voter to the voter so that the voter may make referendum style decisions to vote out a bum who is underperforming or acting contrary to the voter's wishes.

As a result, it is in people's interest to vote for a major party candidate even if they are more aligned with another candidate.

To the bad, people lose the ability to vote for individual candidates.

Instead of voting for candidates, people vote for parties.

What has been politically interesting on Facebook this year to me, by contrast, is individual PEOPLE using the site for their OWN political purposes — telling their friends to support a candidate, go vote, etc., the same way they might put a bumper sticker on their car or a sign in their yard.

The instant runoff system is considered a very good voting system when choosing between multiple options because it avoids the spoiler effect (e.g. two similar options stealing each other votes so a 3rd candidate who is actually less popular than them wins), doesn't discourage votes for options perceived as underdogs and leads to a compromise most people can agree to.

Of course, that means that a candidate that every single person voted for can lose.

An important thing to know is 1) how many of those people giving money to Obama & Paul are registered with their party 2) how many of those people are eligible to vote for those candidates in primaries.

Especially, showing that a) the media did indeed «write her up» and b) that promoting a candidate like this actually makes more people vote for them, instead of rallying the supporters of the underdog, for instance.

People who either stand or vote for the three main parties should be «hung by the neck until dead» a Ukip candidate has suggested.

On the contrary, if «your» candidate is losing in the polls you may consider your vote more important to omit and can even flirt with voting for someone despite not supporting him / her completely (let's call it a protest vote, see French presidential election in 2002, with a lot of people voting for small groups on the 1st round).

Are there limits (age, crime,...) for participation in US elections (Congress, president,...), for people who vote or for candidates?

In a Facebook post, the former candidate said she was «proud» of her campaign and the people who voted for her.

So the optimal strategy for candidates is to win the support of people who can get lots of voters along to a meeting to go to vote.

You'd have to assume that people who truthfully tell you that they are voting for the Tory candidate give the same responses as those who say they are voting for the Bradley candidate but who are really voting for the Tory.

For example, some people may have voted Trump because he was the only Republican - like candidate who could reasonably win.