Political pundits say that
people vote for the party, the party leader and the local candidate in that order of priority.
Instead of voting for candidates,
people vote for parties.
In an age when more
people vote for parties based on their leaders, Corbyn is dragging his side down.
There is almost an argument that if we want to do things on the basis of what was in the manifestos, we should remember that the most
people voted for the party that was most lukewarm on the issue.
They have that majority because lots of
people voted for those parties.
Can you recall anything in the past where a Westminster governing party was «politically inept» and why do you think twice as many
people vote for your party as support its flagship policy.
Millions of
people voted for parties perceived to be to Labour's left — the SNP and the Greens.
Hung parliaments are increasingly likely under FPTP given that an increasing proportion of
people vote for parties other than the historically big two.
Traditionally, those studying voting behaviour suppose that
people vote for the party they are most ideologically related to or which best represents their interests.
Not exact matches
Although members of The
People's
Vote are quick to point out that they're asking for a different kind of vote, pro-Brexit leaders in the Conservative party, which controls the government, say the public doesn't want to vote on Brexit ag
Vote are quick to point out that they're asking
for a different kind of
vote, pro-Brexit leaders in the Conservative party, which controls the government, say the public doesn't want to vote on Brexit ag
vote, pro-Brexit leaders in the Conservative
party, which controls the government, say the public doesn't want to
vote on Brexit ag
vote on Brexit again.
As
people who care deeply about their country, we are taught implicitly to
vote for the
party that most closely resembles our set of beliefs and convictions.
In 2017,
for example, Republicans largely
voted along
party lines to do away with an Obama - era regulation designed to keep guns out of the hands of some
people with severe mental illness (Republican senators were joined by four Democrats in this
vote).
Did the
party take its base
for granted and not give
people enough of a reason to
vote for them?
Either it means that other members of his
party — the finance minister, who is against the referendum — will come in and not hold a referendum at all, and try to keep Greece on the austerity plan, or there will be a fall in the government, a no - confidence vote, and people will presumably vote for the Conservative Party, which is very much like the Republican Party in the United St
party — the finance minister, who is against the referendum — will come in and not hold a referendum at all, and try to keep Greece on the austerity plan, or there will be a fall in the government, a no - confidence
vote, and
people will presumably
vote for the Conservative
Party, which is very much like the Republican Party in the United St
Party, which is very much like the Republican
Party in the United St
Party in the United States.
I am independent... I
vote for the
person I think is the best, not
for the parry or
for the
party agenda.
It outlines a number of areas
for Christians to consider and advises
people to
vote for a
party that is interested in «reversing the accumulation of power and wealth in fewer and fewer hands, whether those of the state, corporations or individuals».
America could be a true multi-party system as in Europe, but the existing
parties have been quite effective at duping
people into
voting for them so that the other side wouldn't win.
And so we get silly
people voting for third
party candidates when they should be out trying to change the system.
In practice, most
people are at least partially aware of this problem and so
vote for one of the two major
parties, who divide up their positions to try and get just over half of the practical voters.
It is against this background of public moral struggle that the
people of Israel prepare to
vote on July 23
for their next government, in an election that pits the conservative Likud
Party of Menachem Begin and current Prime Minister Yitzak Shamir against the Labor
Party headed by two - time loser Shimon Peres.
Around 65 per cent of younger
people voted for Jeremy Corbyn's Labour
Party earlier this year and YouGov has observed that «age seems to be the new dividing line in British politics», with older
people tending to favour the Conservative
Party and younger
people generally
voting Labour.
You also have
people who can register as a specfic
party and run on a ticket to strengthen their careers and yet they only espouse one or two things that could count them into the
party in the first place.There's also a huge issue of
people really thinking that a
vote for a 3rd
party candidate is a waste, If the only way you feel your
vote matters is by
voting for one of 2
parties (even if you are unsatisfied with both) does it actually matter?
Only a self - destructive
person would
vote for someone who plans to remove the safety net, legislate against women, and whose
party has done everything it could to suppress the
vote.
Black folks please read the evil words towards christians here by radical dems and come home to the
party of lincoln who freed ur
people from slaves, u can
vote for herman cain, hes at the top of all polls now with repubs
With just one day to go until the General election, Premier spoke with Christian candidates about why
people should
vote for their
party.
In a rare unscripted moment at the Democratic National Convention this week, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa called
for a voice
vote to pass an amendment to the
party platform reinstating language that identified Jerusalem as the rightful capital of Israel and that referred to
people's «God - given potential» in its preamble.
They would be rightly called part of the «evangelical right wing»; they believe abortion is the great evil of our generation, that the US is a Christian nation, and that «no one who is a Christian can
vote for this (policy /
party /
person).»
Yes we indeed supports Republican candidate
for this reason until now, that the Tea
Party (haters of President Obama) came in, with some look warm Christian joined, they were so strong, they
voted out the
person as a true Christian that I thought would be the next Christian Presidential Candidate
for Republican.
welcome to the rupiblican
party... these are the
people they have brainwashed into
voting for them.
Voting for someone simply because he is of a certain church,
party, race, etc. is just as dumb and unthinking as not
voting for that
person for the same reasons.
I don't think God cares what political
party you
vote for, it doesn't make you a better
person.
At least some of them
voted for him because the Republican
party is full of disgusting
people like you.
The reality is 65 million
people voted for Trump... and while a lot of those
votes came from
people who were legitimately frustrated with both political
parties and wanted someone to shake up the system, and a lot of
votes cam from traditional doctrinaire Republican voters who held their nose and
voted for the guy because they wanted a tax cut, and other voters were pseudo-moralistic Evangelical hypocrites who wanted to reward McConnell
for STEALING Merrick Garland's Supreme Court seat, there were a whole lot of Trump voters — including a lot of voters from Pennsylvania's «T» — who
voted for Trump because they are racist, white supremicist xenophobes who saw in Trump someone who spoke their language and would «make america great again» (read «make america WHITE again»).
I
vote for the
person best suited to the job regardless of their
party.
Elisabetta Gardini, from the European
People's
Party (EPP) said: «Today «s
vote is in line with the spirit of the international standards on marketing and mothers «milk substitutes developed by the World Health Organization, which aim to ensure that there is no form of advertising or promotional material
for substitute products of mother «s milk.
The best lesson
for both British
parties to draw from Mr. Obama is the one Brooks noted when Obama abandoned his pledge to take public election financing: that as well as being an inspiring speechmaker he's also «a tough - minded Chicago pol (
person of Polish descent) who would throw you under the truck
for votes».
The young and the energetic Konkomba Youth Group, who have volunteered to preach to their
people about the good things President John Dramani Mahama is doing and how important the NDC as a
party recognize the entire Kokomba community have said, the President has exposed the NPP and their Northern Regional Chairman Bugri Naabu
for the lies they have spewed across the Konkomba communities just to win their
votes
As a result, it is in
people's interest to
vote for a major
party candidate even if they are more aligned with another candidate.
In the Netherlands it is possible
for a single politician to control an entire
party (Geet Wilders) but this still doesn't confer extra
votes to that
person.
All of this means that Cameron finds himself in a fairly tricky position, having to rely on mobilising Remain
votes from large numbers of
people who
voted against him last May while hoping that the leader of the Labour
Party will actually stand up and make a direct and unequivocal plea
for voters to keep Britain in the EU.
She further urged them to communicate effectively the government's development efforts to the
people and in a manner that would convince them to
vote massively
for the
party.
After a series of terrible polls
for Labour in recent days, Corbyn told MPs he planned to enthuse
people to
vote for the
party through the use of «online media».
I think you can avoid this with (i) a primary election day
for all
parties where voters have to choose which
party to
vote for OR (ii) a Labour - only primary election day where
people who want to
vote have to register first.
An important thing to know is 1) how many of those
people giving money to Obama & Paul are registered with their
party 2) how many of those
people are eligible to
vote for those candidates in primaries.
People who either stand or
vote for the three main
parties should be «hung by the neck until dead» a Ukip candidate has suggested.
Once Barron get his 50,000 plus
votes for governor of the Freedom
Party Line he will be speaking
for a lot of
people.
As far as I know, no
party has allowed
people registered
for other
parties to
vote in their primaries, only
people registered
for no
party.
This would be a bigger deal in election years where one
party has a contested primary and the other one doesn't (meaning there's not too much of a reason
for people to go
vote in one of them, so why not
vote in the other?).
«The
people of Scotland
voted for a
party that wanted to have a referendum on independence.
It is very difficult
for third
parties to make any kind of progress in first past the post systems, as few
people will be willing to
vote for a third
party when that means they don't get to express their choice about the more dominant
parties.