Sentences with phrase «people voting for the change»

However, I'm not sure that their money will be able to stop people voting for the change that our country needs.

A little over six months ago, the British people voted for change.

Not exact matches

He argued that the new government's perceived approach to Brexit is not only about leaving the EU, but also fundamentally changing the British economy, saying: «Basically its rewarding people who voted for Brexit, its about infrastructure, its about the productivity gap, its about the regional divide, rebalancing the economy — the stuff that was talked about in 2008, but nothing happened.

Knuckling under to this protection racket is not the change that most people voted for in November 2008.

In a secret ballot on 23 June 2015, Yindjibarndi people throughout the State voted by an overwhelming two - thirds majority for change in the management and leadership of Yindjibarndi Native Title business.

Speaking to 1,000 people at the sold out conference, Broadbent called on delegates to seize this «once - in - a-generation opportunity for progressive change, an opportunity to ensure we have a fair voting system in which every voter counts, in which every citizen has a real opportunity to elect a candidate according to his or her values.

The vote for change was 246 for and 123 against - the biggest majority in five years confirming that Yindjibarndi people have lost confidence in Yindjibarndi Aboriginal Corporation (YAC).

For shares you hold beneficially in the name of a broker, trustee or other nominee, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, trustee or nominee, or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker or nominee giving you the right to vote your shares, by attending the meeting and voting in person.

For one I could point out 20 mispelling errors, «Mormonism» not a word, weird huh.I am a Mormon I do support Mitt and I did in 2008, but religion aside Mitt can get it done, and he has in the past!!!! Obama has failed the USA no doubt about that.Mitt's morals, family values is what America is on.Shame on the people who can't move past that, You (not me) voted on a black man for President and not a Mormon, turns out the Mormon Canidiate coud have changed the whole USA around cool hFor one I could point out 20 mispelling errors, «Mormonism» not a word, weird huh.I am a Mormon I do support Mitt and I did in 2008, but religion aside Mitt can get it done, and he has in the past!!!! Obama has failed the USA no doubt about that.Mitt's morals, family values is what America is on.Shame on the people who can't move past that, You (not me) voted on a black man for President and not a Mormon, turns out the Mormon Canidiate coud have changed the whole USA around cool hfor President and not a Mormon, turns out the Mormon Canidiate coud have changed the whole USA around cool huh.

And so we get silly people voting for third party candidates when they should be out trying to change the system.

Even if Labour gave a free vote, which is unlikely, the pressure from Labour constituency activists (not Labour voters) would force most Labour MPs to vote for the change: just a few people of principle will hold out.

Vote for whoever the heck you want but remember that We The People are still gonna be here after election day... Change doesn't happen overnight, not in a year, four, eight, or even fifty if we can't work together.

«It's not just changing demographics that are responsible for the growing Green vote - it's people like my family,» says Greens leader Richard di Natale, who grew up in Reservoir.

Those Labour people advocating primaries turn out to be the same people, on the Labour side, supporting the Vote for a Change campaign - except for Neal Lawson and John Harris.

Or will he show the courage he displayed when he voted against the bombing of Syria, recognise that public opinion has changed and speak up for the real security of the British people?

It is known that people tend to overestimate the share of immigrants (for instance Ipsos 2014 report shows that British respondents think that 31 per cent of population consists of foreign - born respondents, where the figure is closer to 13 per cent according to 2011 Census); here we also show that people's estimations of levels of immigration do not correspond to actual change in their local areas, it is the perception that seems to be linked with anti-immigration vote.

We say all this to remind ourselves, and to alert the generations that follow us, that this, our current British Constitution, endorsed by us, the peoples of the United Kingdom, in 2019, belongs to a long, changing history that goes back via the introduction of votes for all, the Bill of Rights of 1689, the Charter of the Forests and the Magna Carta, to the Norman Conquest of 1066 and its Doomsday Book.

Thus, to have a more egalitarian electorate, we must change our system of voting to one that removes the incentive to vote strategically, and encourages people to vote for what they actually want.

Personally, I would prefer to vote for them as well, but there needs to be some freedom in allowing the president to change these people around.

Liberal columnist Kyle Smith urges people to vote for Howie Hawkins, the man who's been trying to create widespread change for years.

But it is also true that people in different parts of Britain have voted for change in referendums on numerous occasions.

Changes like early voting, no - excuse absentee voting, or same day registration to make it easier for people to vote are commonplace in other states, but are resisted in New York.

First - unlike the convoluted constitutional ballot measures we see in the voting booth each November, these are going to have to be presented as either one entire batch of changes (almost guaranteed to fail because everybody can find something serious enough to disagree with) or as individual questions for people to affirm or deny.

The key to change as always is for people to get up off their lazy, complacent asses and vote.

The government will need to reassure people that voting for peace will produce positive change.

This is similar to majority voting, but allows additional deliberation about the two most viable candidates even if one of them wins a majority in the first round, on the ground that, for example, everyone may be familiar with an incumbent, but not with a number of challengers, and that once the number of challengers is narrowed to one and people have a chance to examine the challenger more carefully, they may change their minds.

The changes in 2015 vote intention among those people who voted Liberal Democrat in 2010 between the first (February - March) and second (May - June) BESIP survey show small increases for the Conservatives, UKIP and the Green Party.

Given the way the elections preparations have unfolded these elections have the potential to create instability and spread insecurity if local politicians use violence, corruption and money to buy votes in a situation in which the people aim for change.

Asking whether Scotland «should become an independent country» emphasises, however faintly, that people would be voting for a significant change.

«I think that for the first time the MPLA has not won... We succeeded in mobilising the majority of people, Angolans voted overwhelmingly for change.»

This result shows Ed Miliband is changing the Labour party and we are again earning the trust of people who didn't vote for us in 2010.»

«It's about the people of New York who want fundamental change, and I'm very pleased to be finding that added outlet for people to vote in addition to the Republican party line.

The figures for how people say they would cast their constituency votes are as follows, with the change on last year's actual results in brackets.

The governor's people will shrug and claim that it's the Legislature that's obstructing his efforts to prepare for the vote, because if a convention actually comes to pass it would tend to diminish the influence of the Assembly and Senate to guide constitutional change.

But the Welsh Affairs Select Committee says that should only happen if the people of Wales vote for the change in a referendum.

Here in the Rhondda a new dawn has already broken over the Valleys, people have voted for change.»

Stressing that it was ultimately about who can deliver and improve on the lives of the people, Dr. Bawumia noted that even though he is from the North, he won't just campaign on that fact but indicated that the most important reason why the NPP must be voted for in the December election is that the Nana Akufo - Addo — Mahamudu Bawumia — NPP is the competent and visionary team that can be trusted to change the lives of Ghanaians positively and bring the development, jobs and prosperity desired.

People who obviously changed their voting habits to elect a Democratic majority (male voters split 50/50 last night, a third of Evangelicals voted for Democrats) were taking a chance on a party in which Hillary is now the standard bearer.

If the boundaries of such Election District have been created or changed since the last preceding General Election at which members of Assembly were elected then the above formula shall apply based on that percentage of the number of persons enrolled in the Party in such Election District on the list of enrolled voters last published by the Board of Elections which the total vote cast in the County for governor under the Party emblem at the last preceding gubernatorial election bore to the total Party enrollment in the County on the list of enrolled voters last published by the Board of Elections.

«I think that there are people who may have voted for Donald Trump and they voted for him for a lot of reasons and one of those reasons was they wanted a change and they wanted an economic change,» she said.

Nwala said, «Otti has implicit confidence in the ability of the judiciary to assuage the yearning desire for justice by the people of Abia, who voted for him to bring positive change and transform their lives.»

this result shows Ed Miliband is changing the Labour party and we are again earning the trust of people who didn't vote for us in 2010.

She explains that people should make sure to vote for a new government because Israel needs to change.

If each person had a choice of voting +1 for a candidate, or -1 against another, would there be any significant change in outcome?

Brethren DO NOT DONATE FOR CHANGE but instead VOTE FOR CHANGE bcos ur money will end up in some people's pockets.

As a result, it has proposed the procedure for taking decisions be changed so issues which normally require unanimous agreement, such as terrorism, fraud and the trafficking of people, drugs and arms, be decided merely on a majority vote.

«I think there may well be a consideration by many people that it didn't matter who they voted for, that nothing would have changed because of the party political system.»

The people of the state voted for the new governor because they wanted to see change and his poll numbers confirm confidence in him to bring it.

The generational approach falls flat — young people don't vote much in low - turnout midterm primaries, lol, and anyway aren't necessarily clamoring for one of their own, and Maloney is not the right target for a «change» campaign.

On that basis I'm quite sure when it comes to a general election people will be voting for a government - whether you want to keep Gordon Brown and Labour or want a change.»