Not exact matches
While I understand that the NDP must feel intense pressure to capture
votes — including fromÂ
people who have never taken a course from John Smithin — I often wish that the NDP would show a bit more policy
leadership on the issue of the deficit and debt. I was particularly disappointed during the 2008 federal
election campaign when Mr. Layton stated, unequivocally, that the NDP would not run a deficit
in the following year if elected (even though it was clear that Canada was entering a recession).
Yet, even with the influx of all these new
people after the
election, the membership which
voted in the
leadership contest probably looked pretty similar, and thought pretty similarly, to the membership that had campaigned for a Labour victory
in May 2015.
In a separate legal action, it has also emerged that a group of Labour members is taking the party to court over its decision to bar 130,000 people from voting in its upcoming leadership electio
In a separate legal action, it has also emerged that a group of Labour members is taking the party to court over its decision to bar 130,000
people from
voting in its upcoming leadership electio
in its upcoming
leadership election.
• I have been hearing Harriet Harman making claims that the scrutiny of the
people registered to
vote in the
leadership election was proper and within the party rules.
The Labour
leadership candidate Jeremy Corbyn has called on the party to root out
people voting for him
in a bid to to skew the
election result.
I don't object to having some time limit on joining to
vote in the
leadership election but 1) that should be made known when
people join and 2) six months is far too long — it should be no more than one or two.
Until the party and its
leadership can admit to the mistakes made
in government, or to the lack of courage shown
in not tackling the clear problems that prevent ordinary
people from enjoying the sort of life that the middle classes take for granted, then I fear a whole swathe of Labour supporters will simply choose not to
vote Labour, whatever promises are made at the next
election (this is essentially ditching the last vestiges of New Labour I suppose).
In a speech setting out how Labour would move on from an
election defeat that remained «very raw», Ms Harman stressed that the influence of the unions over the decision on
leadership had been altered by the move to a «one
person, one
vote» electoral system.
Around 70,000
people who
voted in the
leadership election did NOT
vote Labour
in May's general
election.
With the window for taking part
in Labour
leadership election closing and ballot papers going out there were several polls over the weekend asking about the
leadership candidates, though no fresh polling of
people voting in the actual contest.
Our raw data finds that slightly more
people who
voted in the last
leadership election backed Ed Miliband rather than his brother David, even though David won more
votes among individual party members.
Indeed, as many as 164,000
people signed up to
vote in the party's
leadership elections on the last day of registration, with many crediting the rise of Jeremy Corbyn for this exponential growth.
The first thing to remember is that the relatively few
people eligible to
vote in the Labour
leadership election — 400,000 odd until a few weeks ago, now more like 600,000 — are not remotely representative of the rest of the country.
Boldly, Ed discredited the system by saying that it «should be a thing of the past for
people to have more than one
vote in the
leadership election».
A group of Labour members is taking the party to court over its decision to bar 130,000
people from
voting in its upcoming
leadership election.