Sentences with phrase «people warming the planet»

How much HAVE (your capitalization) people warmed the planet, again no one knows.

That then allows people to believe that a view on obese people warming the planet is at least on a par with fact and can be perceived as valid science.

Not exact matches

With its slower pace of living, warm, welcoming climate, healthy, fresh foods and reputation as one of the «greenest and cleanest» countries in the world with little pollution, lots of clean water and fresh air... it's no wonder Costa Ricans are considered the «happiest people on the planet».

If a Republican candidate would say, — yes even if a messiah is coming, people had been saying that for 2000 years, therefore, we are all obliged to preserve the planet for future generations and human activities do excessively cause global warming.

If you care about the people in this world living closest to the margins, then you need to do everything in your power to slow the rate at which the planet warms, for they are the most vulnerable.

It must be very comforting looking forward to the apocalypse with such delight and fervour.Gee, I wish I believed in a god that will rip the planet apart and save his chosen ones (the best flatterers), while the rest suffer in torment for eternity.I get a warm, fuzzy feeling, just thinking about it.No I don't... Your god sounds like something any sane person would run from, screaming,, as fast as possible

Crysius continues to be beneficial to his people, and he, a ray of warmth, is dependable; but to say that he is faithful is no more appropriate than to say of the sun that it is faithful to the earth because it regularly warms our planet.

There's no value at all from using enormous land and water resources and warming the planet in order to produce a billion tons of food that ultimately don't get eaten — particularly when one in nine people is malnourished in the world.

It may seem surprising to people, but you can look at something like Mars, which has a very thin atmosphere, and you can look at something like Venus which we tend to think of as sort of having this rather heavy, clouded atmosphere, which [is] hellishly warm because of runaway greenhouse effect, and on both of those planets you are seeing this phenomenon of the atmosphere leaking away, is actually what directly has led to those very different outcomes for those planets; the specifics of what happened as the atmosphere started to go in each case [made] all the difference.

Today people are warming the planet by putting carbon dioxide in the atmosphere — and methane too.

That's basic physics and chemistry and people who claim that they don't believe that, they don't believe we're warming the planet through increasing CO2 levels because of climate models, they don't understand the fact that you don't need a climate model to come to that conclusion.

As the planet warmed, selection might have favored people of slighter stature.

Given that many claim humans are influencing global warming and the number of people that now are on the planet I do not know how a thinking person can not see that most of us have to change our focus on consuming animal products.

«We know that many billions are required over the next few years to fill the gap in climate finance, but the money pledged today is vital to help some of the most vulnerable people on the planet cope with the immediate impacts of our rapidly warming world,» Ishii continued.

«If you can eat or wear it, invest in it»... Long term 3 factors might drive food prices up instead: 1) Global warming and weather anomalies; 2) 9 billion people in the planet by 2050 (and then more); 3) Increasing role of biomasses in the renewable energy sector.

Only a fool, or a person with ulterior motives, would not want MORE nighttime warming and MORE greening of our planet in the next 150 years!

It's not that a «warmed planet» will be «inferior» to today's planet, but what happens to those 6 billion people during the transition?

Isn't this a surreal transition time when many people continue with business as usual, chomping up the comforts of our world and choosing to ignore every trend except maybe global warming, and others feel that the life signs of our planet are declining so fast that it's already too late no matter what we do.

Few people on the planet have done more to harm the environment, to thwart the technology - only strategy for dealing with global warming, and to create the political polarization he now (laughably) decries than Newt Gingrich.

If the world's foremost climate scientists didn't know whether man's activities were warming or cooling the planet, how could any responsible government condone scaring its people with «descriptions of climate - related health risks»?

Like hundreds of millions of people, I share the fear of runaway global warming and ocean acidification, of losing the richness of life forms we humans share the planet with, of plastic and other toxics substances contaminating the biosphere.

Never before has it been possible for people from all over the world to access the latest information and collectively seek solutions to the challenges which face our planet, and not a moment too soon: the year 2015 was the hottest in human history, and the Great Barrier Reef is suffering the consequences of warming oceans right now.

On the science If people understood what Hansen has been explaining, what the IPCC report says if you read it closely, what climate scientists say off the record, what I try to cull together from the literature, they would understand that we can't go above 450 p.p.m. [parts per million of CO2 in the atmosphere], because that will almost certainly take us across thresholds that shoot to 750 to 1000 p.p.m. — and that is 5 °C + warming, and that is an ice - free planet.

I always hope the people doubting this warming planet might abandon their air conditioned cars, buildings, etc. and hang for a while in those unbearable conditions.

Warmings are localized; under the laws of physics,; if some part of the planet gets warmer than normal — other part INSTANTLY gets colder than normal — it's called» extreme weather / climate» Yes, climate is the weather; global warmings / global coolings are inside people's heads, not Warmings are localized; under the laws of physics,; if some part of the planet gets warmer than normal — other part INSTANTLY gets colder than normal — it's called» extreme weather / climate» Yes, climate is the weather; global warmings / global coolings are inside people's heads, not warmings / global coolings are inside people's heads, not outside.

Many people on the blog and elsewhere have presented more that a scrap of evidence that anthropogenic greenhouse gases are accumulating in the atmosphere and warming the planet over and above natural changes.

Ideally people will begin using the term «global warming» to refer to the planet's overall heat accumulation.

It succeeds financially by fanning people's fears, by exaggerating, by blaming forest fires on global warming when they've really been started by countercultural individuals who believe «modern lifestyles... are unhealthy and out of harmony with the natural systems of planet Earth.»

There is absolutely no scientific basis for the suggestion that there will be «disruptions to the food supply (Including the ocean food chain) and access to clean water» from a «warming planet» caused by AGW, with «a few tens of millions of starving people» as a result.

Last time the planet warmed 2 ° it resulted in... well... basically nothing, but people think another 2 ° will signal the heat death of the planet.

No court finding can dictate whether man - made greenhouse gas emissions are warming the planet and causing damage to people, ecosystems and cities.

The more CO ₂ people emit, the more the planet warms.

To me all the witnesses and senators are obviously persons of consequence but I don't think your excerpt shows that anyone should think he takes issue with this statement — «No one questions that surface temperatures have increased overall since 1880, or that humans are adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, or that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases have a warming effect on the planet.»

Find solutions so that people stop breeding as well as stopping using Oil in order to REVERSE Global warming and the destruction of the planet!

But they do not disagree about the underlying chemistry and physics of their enterprise — all of which show that people are warming the planet through their industrial greenhouse - gas emissions.

In 50 years, even if the warmest global climate models were correct (even the cooler ones look too warm right now) what will be the most important thing to the 9 billion people on this planet?.

The hard truth is that the people of the world are going to have to adapt to a warmer planet — regardless of the cause of that warming.

A documentary of people living with the consequences of global warming as well as scientists» new approaches to mitigating climate change and adapting to an evolving planet.

Sanders notes, «This isn't the usual debate between global warming deniers and people who want to tax big oil in order to save the planet.

So when discussing climate change with the people in your life who don't understand its urgency, ask them to think about why they believe the planet isn't warming and why we don't need to act.

If you missed the reams of comments posted here by people living there, who were telling us that this past winter was much colder than usual, and begging the planet to «send us some of that global warming», then go back over the archives and tell us they were all wrong, and that those articles are accurate when they say «The unseasonably warm and wet winter so far in Britain has coaxed plants into early flowering.»

Unlike all those people who constantly talked about the planet warming because the same things showed warming for a while.

Basically, you can not deny that people hold a warranted belief that added GHGs will warm the planet.

A. people who have a warranted belief that added GHGs will warm the planet, all other things being equal.

The San Diego County businessman has said he's not convinced that people cause climate change and has suggested that a warmer planet might not be such a bad thing.

You sound almost gleeful that your figures supposedly show that 7 billion people are on the way to a dreadful future of a warmed planet.

While most people now understand that the enhanced greenhouse effect means a much warmer planet, communicating regional shifts in weather remains a significant challenge.

2] they would have realized by now that: nobody is monitoring the WHOLE planet's temp = nobody knows what's the GLOBAL temp, warming is in people's heads, not the earth..

That incident fueled my skepticism from that point, not about whether CO2 and methane and black carbon could warm the planet, but rather about the motives and scientific accuracy of major proponents, such as the IPCC and the people who headed up scientific core areas for the IPCC (including Mann).

The authors show how regional short - term temperature fluctuations help explain the «gullibility» with which some people have been «so readily convinced of a false conclusion» that the planet has stopped warming.