Not exact matches
«It's been around long enough that it established itself among superstitious
people with no real
scientific knowledge,» = > Ok, now you are way off base.
The
scientific evidence of the genetic cause of human $ exuality — and that is all human $ exuality — ho.mo $ exuality, hetero $ exuality, bi $ exuality, and transgenderism is overwhelming, and obvious to any
person with a modicu.m of
knowledge or common sense.
There are only gullible
people like yourself, who have been suckered into the ancient, illogical, stagnant mythology of magical thinking and others, like me, who choose to pursue the
scientific method and spend the rest of my life improving my own
knowledge with new discoveries and participating in the great modern renaissance of mankind!
The Universe, known and unknown, is possibly not the most used definition of God, at least in the western world... but it is the Pantheistic version that jives so much more
with science and is not a misappropriation of the smaller definitions of God, merely an unfamiliar definition to those
with less
knowledge of various more advanced religious and philosophic thought, within and outside those religions... The idea of Pantheism also thoughtfully considers why there is, rather than ridiculing, such a wide range of philosophical and ritual beliefs from a
scientific perspective... without having to classify large groups of
people, as senseless idiots from one end or destined for hell from the other.
It seemed to him necessary to distinguish the immediate «acquaintance
with» God of the religious
person from the indirect «
knowledge about» to which at best
scientific knowledge could lead.
Writing in this month's
Scientific American, Gary Stix investigates the mechanisms of such resilience and how this
knowledge can provide reassurance to those who suffer personal losses as well as help to craft treatment and intervention programs for
people with post-traumatic stress and depression.
This provides a clear picture of the current
scientific knowledge regarding to the effects of physical activity on the health of
people living
with PD.
Charles Valentine Riley Memorial Lecture In 2008, the Charles Valentine Riley Memorial Foundation (RMF) made a gift to AAAS to endow a Charles Valentine Riley Memorial Lecture at AAAS in honor of Professor Riley's legacy as a «whole picture»
person with a vision for enhancing agriculture through
scientific knowledge.
The Johnson O'Connor Research Foundation is a nonprofit
scientific research and educational organization
with two primary commitments: to study human abilities and to provide
people with a
knowledge of their aptitudes that will help them in making decisions about school and work.
Christa combines her holistic and
scientific knowledge to help
people heal from the root cause of their illness, using food as medicine,
with a mind, body, and spirit approach to wholeness.
With such a wide range of experience and
scientific knowledge in the field, it was easy to see how different
people have different ideas when the subject of allowable colors is brought up.
When a group of
people claiming superior
scientific knowledge and understanding refuses to grasp the extremely simple point I've been making regarding the heating capacity of an absence of volcanic eruptions, then I am forced to take all their other arguments
with a huge grain of salt.
You take away the wonder of science if you say emphatically that
people are wrong and you are right when the
scientific evidence is based on models, and theories
with huge gaps in the
knowledge.
So - called «consensus» climate science reaches new lows nearly every day,
with many researchers now better resembling dogmatic, fire - and - brimstone preachers — the kind of
people who burnt heretics at the stake during the Middle Ages and suppressed
scientific discovery — than scientists engaged in the pursuit of
knowledge.
Most of the comments come from
people with their own «ax to grind» and
with little or no
scientific knowledge acquired by studying the
scientific literature about global climate changes including those caused by greenhouse gases.
Everywhere we look we can find virtual mountains of
scientific research
with regard to unsustainable pyramid schemes that are surreptitiously foisted upon the human community by a few deceitful
people with knowledge at the expense of many too many others who are not «in the know».
There is a tremendous disconnect between what most
people (especially here in the US) think that the state of the
scientific knowledge is, and what it really is — partly, I think, because it's hard to grasp just how big the field of climate science is, partly because of organized disinformation campaigns orchestrated by the likes of Senator Inhofe, Exxon and Massey Energy, and informed by the tactics (and sometimes funding sources) of the tobacco denial movement, and partly because who really * wants * to believe in a big, tough - to - deal -
with danger to the well - being of our kids and our society?
She has developed interests in communicating the
scientific outputs
with the common
people, especially the
people in developing countries by transferring the
scientific knowledge to the general public.
One way a covered entity may demonstrate that it has met the standard is if a
person with appropriate
knowledge and experience applying generally accepted statistical and
scientific principles and methods for rendering information not individually identifiable makes a determination that the risk is very small that the information could be used, either by itself or in combination
with other available information, by anticipated recipients to identify a subject of the information.
As discussed above, such a determination must be made by a
person with appropriate
knowledge and expertise applying generally accepted statistical and
scientific methods for rendering information not identifiable.
We note that in the final rule, we reformulate the standard somewhat to require that a
person with appropriate
knowledge and experience apply generally accepted statistical and
scientific methods relevant to the task to make a determination that the risk of re-identification is very small.
(1) A
person with appropriate
knowledge of and experience
with generally accepted statistical and
scientific principles and methods for rendering information not individually identifiable:
This, along
with a strong grasp on
scientific concepts, and a great ability to impart
knowledge make me the perfect
person to hire as a science teacher.