Before, I was helping
people with their money choices and challenges.
Not exact matches
Reality of the situation In the end the
people with power who have
money to hire lobbyists and sway influence
with members of the CRTC will either get their way entirely or come to some sort of «compromise «that benefits them more than the average Canadian who wants consumer
choice.
So they are taking that
choice away, and saying to the companies, «it doesn't matter how much
money you want to save, you WILL provide your
people with this standard of care and coverage.»
Of course, in daily life, we often have real
choices — whether I should go out
with this
person, whether I should accept this job, whether I should use what
money I have this way or that.
I might be ecelectic, but what makes me consistent is my belief is something that combines the belief of Scripture
with that of Englightenment philosophy: nurturing life is goodness, simply, and helping others to see a model that thinking for ourselves can help heal the world of all past injustices - so that we all learn to WANT to be good... within reason and by our own
choice...: you have a society like that, you'll have less injustices, less violence, less
money - grubbing by
people who hold themselves as representatives of «authority» -(which side are you on, by the way, if you see the world as so divided in such a bipolar reality...?)
Instead, we have no
choice who gives how much — the government takes
money under the guise of being compassionate, but lawmakers can not show compassion by being generous
with other
people's
money.
I'm getting annoyed
with so many
ppl thinking players like mahrez or rafinha are good enough for arsenal we need to aim a lot higher if we don't want to get swollowed by bigger teams it's time wenger makes a
choice on wether we are gonna do what spurs did and build a younger team
with lemar goretzka or kieta and try to out run n out pace teams or spend big big
money on world class players which I know he won't coz mahrez is not world class and we ain't got CL football anyway!
«You don't end up
with profits which represent
people's rational voluntary
choices about where they would like to direct their
money,» he says.
You can spend all the
money you want, but if you have crime,
people with the
choice will go somewhere else.»
With a classically - inspired design evoking Fender Stratocaster - style lines, the Pyle - Pro is a great budget
choice for beginner guitar players and
people looking to save
money without reducing quality.
In six studies
with more than 4,600 participants, researchers found an almost even split between
people who tended to value their time or
money, and that
choice was a fairly consistent trait both for daily interactions and major life events.
People soon realize how much further
money goes in a miniaturized world, and
with the promise of a better life, everyman Paul Safranek (Matt Damon) and wife Audrey (Kristen Wiig) decide to abandon their stressed lives in Omaha in order to get small and move to a new downsized community — a
choice that triggers life - changing adventures.»
«Most
people with any amount of
money have school
choice, but if you are in a certain zip code and you are poor, you don't have
choice,» said Cobey.
I don't like the tough
choice that so many indie authors have to make between «publish exclusively
with Amazon if I want a prayer at actually making any
money on my sales» vs. «publish wide, but at the risk of my visibility, and only selling to
people who actually know me».
It's $ 10 more than the fifth - generation Kindle
with hardware controls, however, and while it's still the best e-reader for the
money in its price range, the design
choices made here might have some
people wishing the older model was still in service.
Many young
people have recently graduated, started earning
money, and are faced
with a wide range of new financial
choices.
They'll do all kind of steps to say they'll pay cash for everything, and I think that's some of the lifestyle
choices that some
people make when they're in that mindset, some of it actually can be helpful to everybody, like being smart
with your
money and using cash more often.
Responsible = completes all appropriate health tests for their breed; has breeding stock tested for appropriate temperament and physical soundness; does in - depth research on pedigrees and other data on potential breeding stock before selecting a breeding pair; puppies raised where they have contact
with people for the majority of the day, experience the daily sights and sounds of an active household and have room to explore; only sells directly to the new owner; selects the right puppy (or offers a
choice of possible matches) for the new owner; will not sell to someone just because they have enough
money if they feel the puppy is not a good fit; keeps in touch
with the new owner, is available to answer any questions and help
with problems if they arise; ALWAYS will take back any animal they produced at any time in that animals life.
With more and more gamers becoming savvy to the used game market, what
choice to publishers have to recoup the rising costs of games development, than to coax
people into giving their
money to those who develop / publish these games, as opposed to those who sell them.
A large concern stemming from the community was how Rockstar was going to deal
with people who accidentally received some of the dirty
money, either not by
choice or collecting one of the billion dollar bounties that have been put up due to the broken
money system.
With two figures included in this set, Buzz and Jessie, the first thing that comes to mind when I first saw this announced was how they had put Woody as a stand alone character, its not rocket science that it makes people buy him as well as you can't have Buzz without Woody, but I still think its a very harsh way of getting extra money out of people as I'll be honest, I can't see Jessie being the number 1 choice to play with for most peo
With two figures included in this set, Buzz and Jessie, the first thing that comes to mind when I first saw this announced was how they had put Woody as a stand alone character, its not rocket science that it makes
people buy him as well as you can't have Buzz without Woody, but I still think its a very harsh way of getting extra
money out of
people as I'll be honest, I can't see Jessie being the number 1
choice to play
with for most peo
with for most
people.
Although she was the clear 6 - 4 favourite
with the bookies, and something of the
people's
choice, art world insiders were long ago putting
money on McQueen.
The scientific process would seem to yield a much more reliable foundation on which to drive societal
choices, rather than the current process of hobbling along
with a failed energy market, the freedom to confuse
people about science by knowingly lying about it in mass media, and unlimited, anonymous
money in politics.
Money, political capital... 20 years from now, when even the most fearfully deluded have no
choice but to «believe» (as if there ever was a
choice) in the global warming,
people with memories (like me) will point their fingers at the Repubs and say, «You!
Our experiences and surmises are remarkably similar: you think Dr. Bengtsson did what he did upon realizing he'd endangered his reputation and
with it exposed himself to increased opposition from those who would now realize what he stands for; that he understood better how his free
choice would impact his ability to gain the respectability of being published by respectable publishers; that he figured out the grant opportunities gained by open alliance
with the tax - free «educational charity» that has a surprising amount of
money for media campaigns and spectacle would not balance the grants he'd lose from
people who consider association
with a transparent tax fraud scheme a bad thing; and, ultimately that he had betrayed the trust of his valued colleagues by exposing them to such scandal.
For all the talk of its disruptive nature, Airbnb still looks a lot like capitalism 1.0:
People with property, or those who have access to credit, find it easy to generate more and more of it; people with money to consume the product benefit from greater choice; and people with none of the above are squeezed out of the equation and collectively absorb the negative impact of higher rents and increasingly transient commun
People with property, or those who have access to credit, find it easy to generate more and more of it;
people with money to consume the product benefit from greater choice; and people with none of the above are squeezed out of the equation and collectively absorb the negative impact of higher rents and increasingly transient commun
people with money to consume the product benefit from greater
choice; and
people with none of the above are squeezed out of the equation and collectively absorb the negative impact of higher rents and increasingly transient commun
people with none of the above are squeezed out of the equation and collectively absorb the negative impact of higher rents and increasingly transient communities.
My principled reason for skepticism is that it doesn't seem to be utterly dominant in fields where models of their own free
choice drive
people to make big decisions
with their own
money.
With a Roth IRA, you have so many more options for investing your
money, and like you say, it forces a
person to investigate, learn, and make a conscious
choice versus just filled out some paperwork, forwarding it to HR, and then forgetting about the whole thing.
I know
people who are
with these agencies that Trusted
Choice recommended,
people who are insured
with them that tell me that I ought to move and that their agency saves them a lot of
money.
With over 5,000,000 people having completed this course already, saving money on your car insurance with them is a solid cho
With over 5,000,000
people having completed this course already, saving
money on your car insurance
with them is a solid cho
with them is a solid
choice.
With the time and
money you'll spend, other
people's testimonials will help you make the wisest
choice.
Most investors entering the business are starting out
with no
money or credit, therefore have no choice but to use Other People's Money (
money or credit, therefore have no
choice but to use Other
People's
Money (
Money (OPM.)