Sentences with phrase «people without bias»

Rather than connecting people without bias, online dating often reinforces racial hierarchy and gender stereotypes.

Not exact matches

«People are claiming that they can train away biases,» Greenwald says, «[They're] making those claims without evidence.»

Or as the research team puts it: «On the other hand, the bias may very well decrease the frequency of analytical reasoning by making it easy and commonplace for people to reach analytical response without engaging analytical processing.»

Companies, even without realizing it, have biases that promote people who look and act a certain way (like those traditional leaders) into leadership positions, perpetuating inequality at the top.

Christianity, particularly that flagrantly practiced and grossly over-preached by evangelists, is also anti-science and is therefore putting our young people and our future workforce at a disadvantage relative to competing nations that now have better science education without religious bias and without the ancient supersti - tions that block modern understanding and technological and medical progress.

For me to know whether or not my words have meaning or «power», I would have to leave the delusional world of «just feeling like zeus is wonderful» to what are the reasons people reject zeus and listen to them without a biased ear.

He cited potential problems as the use of data without people's knowledge and bias decision making, such as computers making decisions in human resources and job applications without fully understanding the criteria.

To say that the Muslims beat their wives, cut peoples body parts off for simply disagreeing with them and that they will kill you if cease to be a Musilm is not bashing, biased or untruthful; It is in the news every day, without exageration.

Every day they reminded us to forget everything we thought we knew about church and christianity, and think about how to present scripture without these biases, so that the church and christianity could find its own path in new cultures and peoples.

«This was not by design but I appointed people on their merit without the slightest bias.

«Without the right bias, you get more unusual patterns of brain organization, which means more people at the top and bottom, and less in the middle.»

In the first post in this series, I critiqued the «naked ape hypothesis of optimal serum 25 (OH) D,» which I believe influences many researchers to interpret uncertainties in the scientific literature in a way that is biased towards recommendations for high intakes of vitamin D that could be harmful to some people, especially without appropriate attention to the nutrient density and balance of the diet, and to the overall context of a healthy diet and lifestyle.

You see, your job as an ally is to believe the stories of marginalized people — such as those in the LGBTQIA community — without bias or presumption.

Your job as an ally is to believe the stories of marginalized people — such as those in the LGBTQIA community — without bias or presumption.

The limit of list culture is the absolute bias of the person compiling it (except of course the Dewey Decimal System which is without imperfection).

Although people rail against journalists and media for having bias, leaking stories, or disseminating fake news, it's hard to imagine a democracy without the press working to obtain the truth.

Daniel Kahneman, the Nobel prize winning economist, has demonstrated through forty years of experiments that people exhibit bias in their everyday and professional lives, mostly without being conscious of it.

And as a matter of FYI, I ran this article past someone who was a reporter for both newspaper and TV, to see if it was accidentally biased for or against self - publishers or trad publishers, which it was never meant to be and as I suspected, this person said that it wasn't and that anyone who read it objectively without any prior personal agenda would see this.

If you think that this is unfair and even biased against young people and others who can't establish or repair credit without taking on debt, you're not alone.

In Daniel Kahneman's best - selling book Thinking Fast and Slow, the famous behavioral psychologist explains the cognitive biases that lead people to jump to conclusions without all of the facts.

My first reaction was to think that you would be more effective if you simply presented clearly data and arguments that prove that the Robinson et al. arguments are riddled with important errors and based on bias rather than scientific arguement, without blatantly ridiculing of the people who wrote the article.

The cognitive bias of illusory superiority derives from the metacognitive inability of low - ability persons to recognize their own ineptitude; without the self - awareness of metacognition, low - ability people can not objectively evaluate their actual competence or incompetence»

So what we have is someone who is clearly identified with an in - group (in your case «skeptics») and who asserts an asymmetry in the climate change domain that qualitatively elevates his own identity group over the out - group («realists»), asserting a cultural cognition bias in someone that he feels is identified with that out - group (without even an attempt to explain the basis for such a determination *), even those that person isn't asserting such a qualitative elevation of his own in - group.

The problem is just that there are too many people commenting on these issues without understanding them, or with an anti-IP bias.

AIDWYC contends that Canadian cases of alleged wrongful convictions should «not [be] examined from the adversarial perspective of trying to show that the convicted person was rightfully treated by the court system» as occurs at present through the Minister of Justice's current practice under section 696.1147 Rather, AIDWYC argues that an independent review board like CCRC should «undertake a fresh review without bias.»

«Without diversity, you have a problem with unconscious bias and you are filtering out people who have already faced barriers [as lawyers],» she says.

We pledge ourselves to recognize the rights of all people and to accept each person without regard to biases, ethnic background or differences of any kind.

A neutral person who is not close to either of you, the therapist, can help you view your problems objectively and discuss them without bias.

So far from these topics being off - limits, any MHP seeking appointment in a court case needs to fully inform the parties prior to their consent [123], of information about the following kinds of potentials for bias and agenda: whether the MHP has been married or divorced, and how many times, and under what kinds of circumstances, and how the MHP currently feels about those events; whether, if divorced, the MHP went through litigation over custody or property, and such details as whether the MHP had problems paying or receiving child support, as well as the custody arrangements of the MHP's own children and how these worked out and everyone's feelings about them; the MHP's own personal experience taking care of and spending time with children, within and without the scope of «parenting», and with regard to parenting, whether that was parenting as a primary caregiver, married or single parent, with or without household and third party help, or as a working parent or stay - home parent, and for how many children, and for how long, and the outcomes from all of that; i.e. how much time has this person actually spent caring for children on his or her own, and how well did this person's own family systems function, and is this person in fact an «expert» in creating a functioning family and raising happy, healthy, successful children with good outcomes, nay «best» outcomes, thoroughly well - adjusted and having reached the very pinnacles of their innate potential.

My point regarding contacting Carolyne «if» you were ever in need of assistance in her geographical area of operations is this: If you are going to judge someone's character by way of how that person expresses one's self on paper, what is on paper is all that you are judging; you have not interacted with that person on any meaningful level and thus form your opinion from a pre-determined negative bias without actually knowing the person.

This type of thinking will create an extreme bias in working with such people and you may wind up losing a lifetime client without thinking through the process of relationship building.

Of course landscape experts feel this is true and that it is how it is written here, I just hope people don't take that information without realizing the bias of the statement.