Not exact matches
I think it's pretty likely that the
person reporting the abuse thought the point was to condemn Christianity by saying Hitler was Christian, rather than to establish the facts in response to the
erroneous claim that Hitler was atheist.
Otherwise, you're as
erroneous as the rest of the
people who «
claim» to be Christian but have no idea what that means, what the history is, what the rules are and what is expected of them.
Claiming that religion or atheism is more credible because of what more «smart»
people think is
erroneous either way.
The council's response to that
claim was that
persons have rights, whether their religious opinions be
erroneous or not, and that, in any event, states lack theological competence.
I've heard
people claim that coconut oil has a «thermogenic effect» supported by the
erroneous idea that coconut oil is synonymous with a semi-synthetic laboratory product known as MCT oil.
That a few
people make baseless
claims is of zero value, when they can not justify these
claims and when these
claims lead to some strong results that are totally
erroneous by contradicting very well j' known facts.
Your
erroneous science notwithstanding, seeing that you are the kind of
person to
claim membership of the House of Lords in a communication to members of the US Senate when you were actually not a member deserves opprobrium.