Not exact matches
You can just look out for the trifecta
of symptoms that psychologists say define the personality disorder — an unrealistic sense
of superiority, a sense
of entitlement or
belief that the
person deserves special treatment, and a noticeable
lack of empathy.
Atheism only defines my
lack of belief in gods, I will stand up against
people pushing their religion in my face or the public square, instead
of keeping it in their homes and churches - the only two places it belongs.
Atheist means, «a
person who disbelieves or
lacks belief in the existence
of God or gods.»
he added, «That is funny because one
of the reasons I rejected the Christian god is because the Christian god condemns good
people because
of lack of belief.
No, you come to insult, you think your superior for you
lack of belief but the fact you come here to mock and insult others shows you for the small minded
person you are.
However, I do not think that a
person's religion or
lack of religious
belief should exclude him or her from political office.
An irrational atheist is a
person that has not put rational thought behind their
lack of belief in a god.
It is sad and disturbing that in this day and age (in California believe it or not) I have to keep my
beliefs (or
lack there
of) a secret so, as not to be discriminated against by the very
people who claim they are accepting
of others.
I may not believe in certain
beliefs (or
lack of beliefs) that
people share but I was raised to show some respect.
Of course it would be naïve to assume that sitting down with ISIS terrorists would produce a quick change of heart, but a fearless, coherent defence of orthodox Christian belief about the human person, human love and thus human society is essential and is, at present, generally lacking even among church leader
Of course it would be naïve to assume that sitting down with ISIS terrorists would produce a quick change
of heart, but a fearless, coherent defence of orthodox Christian belief about the human person, human love and thus human society is essential and is, at present, generally lacking even among church leader
of heart, but a fearless, coherent defence
of orthodox Christian belief about the human person, human love and thus human society is essential and is, at present, generally lacking even among church leader
of orthodox Christian
belief about the human
person, human love and thus human society is essential and is, at present, generally
lacking even among church leaders.
Why is it so difficult for some
people to grasp that atheism is simply the
lack of belief in any god?
I think that kind
of reaction is a defense mechanism... that
people that hate on others
beliefs only do so because they
lack confidence in their own
beliefs... and have to put others down to feel better about themselves.
Not only are irrefutable facts being challenged by
people who do not understand the science involved or the importance
of these facts, but the
belief that there is no scientific consensus leads to a
lack of attitudes to change.
Although I don't think
people should be jailed on their
belief or
lack of belief in any god (s), this guy is an idiot.
Our country is not «amoral» because
of the
lack of «religious»
beliefs but because neither our government nor our
people adhere to the Word
of God any longer.
I know lots
of people that like to define atheism more loosely as merely a
lack of belief in God or not yet being convinced in the existence
of God.
I run into a variant myself: I can not even remotely imagine how
people can actually believe in whatever god they do, despite a total
lack of evidence in that
belief, and then conform their lives to it.
Because a
lack of a
belief does not influence or control anything in particular within a
person's brain.
«My religion prevents me from hurting you for your
lack of belief in my hateful god, but you better watch out because (other, less - cowardly religious
people, angry jesus at judgment day, etc.) will get you!»
She was killed by religious
people who didn't like her
lack of belief.
My
lack of belief in God is more a result
of Christians being just normal
people like me, rather than a result
of a few Christians being mean.
Please don't worry too much about other
people's
belief, the consti.tution also grants everyone
of us the freedom to practice whatever it is and (even) the
lack thereof.
It pains me to see how many
people - in this day and age
of scientific enlightenment and understanding - still cling stubbornly to outdated
beliefs that originated through *
lack *
of understanding; through appeal to the pack nature
of humankind, in yearning for kinship and to «belong» to something greater; and through efforts to control, suppress, and subjugate the masses.
Does this mean that you're saying that a) religious
people are nuts and atheists are getting on their level or b) that atheism is somehow a religion because they stand by their
lack of a
belief in a god?
Mike wants to mock
people for not believing as he does, or
lack of belief.
It's not a group
of people joining together to promote a
lack of belief....
I have never been one to believe in God, but why do
people feel the need to join together to promote a
lack of belief?
It would seem the problem is not a
lack of knowledge
of the contents
of the Bible but a
lack of belief in those words or, more accurately, a
belief in the
Person that they describe and profess.
And for the record atheism has nothing to do with anything besides a
lack of a
belief in a divine being, other than that whether or not a
person is for capital punishment or not, gay rights or not, etc, has nothing to do with atheism.
I've never seen a group
of people who claim to have a
lack of belief in god and vehemently deny that Atheism is a religion to push their agenda on so many levels.
you'd think if god was truly the god spoken
of then faith would be unneeded and
belief a thing
of the past — yet —
people will believe whatever they wish no matter the proof or
lack there
of and its truly sad to consider that this delusion type mass brainwashing is going on right now and has been for over 2000 years... please don't let the time in which this sm.ut has been around make you think its worth its wieght in salt — i bid Lot's wife its not — in ALL early man stories from around the globe
people have created GRAND stories about the start and end
of times — its that simple.
Randall Bourquin, founder and president
of the UGAtheists at the University
of Georgia, says it's important for young
people to have a group among whom they can share
beliefs - or
lack of them.
It is overtly obvious that the Framers wanted there to be separation
of Church and State as they valued freedom... it is the act
of protecting those types
of freedoms that makes our country so great today where
people of ALL religions (or
lack thereof) can come to the US and work to make it the best country on Earth without fear
of being persecuted for their
beliefs.
«out
of respect and unison for the majority not for just one
person opinion» Not an opinion - a
belief or
lack of.
When a
person's
belief drives them to take a man's children away from him for no reason other than who he loves, or drives them to rape a lesbian woman to make her straight, when a
person's faith tells them it is good and right to kill another
person because
of their faith or
lack thereof... these are harmful.
You imagine that my
lack of slack - jawed awe and
belief means I'm not a moral, giving, loving
person who contributes to my community, loves my family, makes a difference through my work.
They may not have come out and explicitly said they discriminate when hiring and / or servicing customers, but their
lack of belief in diversity has certainly pushed
people to the side.
There are lot
of people who, when asked, will say they belong to a religion despite a
lack of belief.
Atheism is only the
lack of belief in a god; one can't force
people to not believe in a god.
So
lack of «patience» makes it ok for
people to be intolerant
of others
beliefs?
Your
beliefs don't seem to make you a «better»
person, and my
lack of beliefs don't seem to make me a «worse»
person.
Your
beliefs donâ $ ™ t seem to make you a â $ œbetterâ $
person, and my
lack of beliefs donâ $ ™ t seem to make me a â $ œworseâ $
person.
People may generally be unaware
of the historical
lack of agreement among the fathers
of the Church on when the fetus possesses a soul, but they likely sense at some level
of their mind that their pro — life stance is personally based more on passionate
belief than on demonstrable fact.
From this starting point, Anselm is said to have shown that if believers understand their faith, they «are the only ones who do understand it» (p. 22), from which it would follow that it is only
lack of understanding which leads a
person to reject theistic
belief.
A
lack of belief does not create a
belief system nor does it enforce a
persons reasoning on why they vote the way they do.
Lastly perhaps he has also seen what Sanchez and Ozil have been seeing and being the reason for stalling their contract, which is a
lack of ambition from the
people upstairs and a
lack of belief that this team and club in it's shot - term has a chance at achieving anything better than that being offered at Chelsea.
The basis
of the role model concept in sporting contexts is the
belief that young
people, women, and members
of disadvantaged minorities simply
lack imagination - they can't picture themselves as «winners.»
tactical political reasons (progressive atheists aren't likely to vote for a Republican even if he's an atheist so no votes to be picked up there; a far smaller #
of people who are conservative atheists similarly wouldn't require politician to be atheist to vote for him in the first place; and non-atheists wouldn't be more likely to vote for an atheist over his professed
lack of belief and may be more likely to NOT vote for the
person if they are deeply religious).
«The ever greater centralisation
of power beyond the democratic control
of the
people is not in keeping with the needs
of the twenty - first century; it is against the spirit
of our age; it diminishes our ability to pursue our own global relationships, and in its
lack of accountability and legitimacy it goes against our fundamental
belief that
people should only be led and governed with their consent.»
Groups that rally around radical
beliefs may provide a searching
person with the sense
of self and social identity they are
lacking.