The top two markets, Greeley, Colo. and Midland - Odessa, Texas posted metro GDP
per capita growth rates of 11.6 percent and 10.9 percent respectively.
The two regions that they projected to have the lowest
per capita growth in both scenarios — China / Centrally Planned Asia and SE Asia / Africa, which together account for over 60 per cent of the world's population — were the two regions that showed the highest
per capita growth in both scenarios between 1975 and 2000.
The two regions that the IIASA experts projected to have the highest rates of GDP
per capita growth between 1975 and 2000 in both of their scenarios — the USSR / Eastern Europe and Middle East / North Africa — turned out to be the two regions which experienced NEGATIVE growth in output per head for the period.
The default inputs for population growth rate, GDP
per capita growth rate, emissions intensity per capita, fossil fuel reserves, etc. are variables in the model and people who are competent at driving these models can change them.
Here we see a very substantial two county study (Alachua County, Florida and San Diego County, California) in which the authors, including Dr. Julie Levy, a noted TNR advocate, write, «In both counties, results of analyses did not indicate a consistent reduction in
per capita growth, the population multiplier, or the proportion of female cats that were pregnant.»
both counties, results of analyses did not indicate a consistent reduction in
per capita growth, the population multiplier, or the proportion of female cats that were pregnant
Results: In both counties, results of analyses did not indicate a consistent reduction in
per capita growth, the population multiplier, or the proportion of female cats that were pregnant.
«For the most recent time, we show that the total impact has grown on average ~ 4 percent between 1950 and 2010, with almost equal contributions from population growth (~ 1.7 percent) and GDP
per capita growth (~ 2.2 percent).
Ghana has seen a significant fall in GDP
per capita growth since 2013, from 4.77 % to 1.52 %.
Cele adds that, although China, the largest steel producer and iron - ore consumer, has experienced hiccups, Chinese steel consumption is still expected to grow in the current decade given the rate and levels of urbanisation and GDP
per capita growth.
He went on to say that 2 % GDP growth paired with 1 % population growth would come out to be a 1.2 % increase in GDP
per capita growth.
Not exact matches
Those measures were the unemployment rate, average weekly wage, job
growth rate, GDP
per capita, and GDP
growth rate.
Jacksonville's non-farm payroll job
growth rate of 2.7 % between February 2017 and February 2018 was tied for seventh - best among the 40 largest metro areas, but its 2016 GDP
per capita of $ 48,406 was the fourth - lowest.
Phoenix's non-farm payroll job
growth rate of 3.0 % between February 2017 and 2018 was the fifth - highest among the 40 largest metro areas, but its 2016 GDP
per capita of $ 49,493 was the fifth - lowest.
San Jose held the top position among the 40 largest metro areas in three of our five metrics: Its Q3 2017 average weekly wage of $ 2,297, 2016 GDP
growth rate of 5.9 %, and 2016 GDP
per capita of $ 126,820 were all best among the nation's big cities.
Those measures included unemployment rate, average weekly wage, job
growth rate, GDP
per capita, and GDP
growth rate.
Although Tampa's 2016 GDP
per capita of $ 46,972 was the second - lowest among the 40 largest metro areas, its GDP
growth rate of 4.2 % that year was the fifth - highest.
San Francisco's Q3 2017 average weekly wage of $ 1,654, its February 2018 unemployment rate of 2.9 %, its 2016 GDP
growth rate of 5.4 %, and its 2016 GDP
per capita of $ 100,132 were all the second - best among the 40 largest metro areas.
Kansas City's 2016 GDP
per capita of $ 61,320 was just below the average of $ 65,391 among the 40 largest metro areas, and its job
growth rate of 1.6 % between February 2017 and February 2018 was just below the average rate of 1.8 %.
Real,
per capita income
growth can only be sustained by increases in productivity.
Katsenelson also argues that since local officials are tasked with meeting specified
growth targets on a
per capita basis, there's an incentive to downplay the size of the local population.
In the long run, Ritter found, investors «would have been better off avoiding countries where
per -
capita GDP rose the most and investing in countries with slower
per -
capita growth.»
Without increasing the tax share of output, 1
per cent real
growth over the next 40 years will yield an inflation - adjusted increase in tax revenue
per capita of about 50
per cent.
Emissions of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, rose by an average of 0.73 percent for every 1 percent
growth in gross domestic product (GDP)
per capita, Richard York of the University of Oregon wrote in his report.
And here are the 10 counties with populations above 10,000 with the highest
per -
capita population
growth from immigration:
According to the OECD, U.K. GDP
per capita — a measure of economic
growth that divides GDP
per the number of people in a country — has doubled since the country joined the EU in 1973.
The study ranked urban centers — excluding the larger metro areas — using three factors: local business environment (length of the average workweek, revenue
growth, industry variety), access to resources (financing and the amount of venture capital investment made
per capita), and costs (office space affordability, labor costs, corporate taxes, and cost of living).
New York's 2014 GDP
per capita of $ 64,819 was the fourth highest in the country, and the Q2 2015 GDP
growth rate of 5.0 % was the eighth highest.
The site rated the locations on 18 key metrics across three different categories: Business Environment (including average revenue
growth per business, start - ups
per capita and average length of work week and commute times), Access to Resources (number of working age, college - educated residents in the area, etc.) and Business Costs (cost of living, office space affordability and others).
Washington led all states in GDP
growth and exports
per capita last year.
While
growth in China is trending lower, the share of global output produced in China will continue to rise, as
per capita incomes converge towards those in the more advanced economies (Graph 6).
In contrast, since 2011 there has been little net
growth in real
per capita incomes.
The first is the recent slow
growth in real
per capita income.
[The above figure] shows the
growth in
per capita spending by federal, state, and local governments following the troughs of the four recessions.
Comparing our opportunity to Japan's, isn't our sovereign credit risk much higher than Japan's in terms of
per capita GDP
growth, structural balance - of - payments deficit, history of default and history of inflation?
Countries can force up economic
growth rates (actual the
growth rate of economic activity) simply by mobilizing savings and forcing up investment rates, but ultimately their inability to absorb continuously the higher levels of capital mean that they can not push real wealth
per capita beyond some fairly hard constraint represented by their institutional inability to absorb investment.
Our real
per capita GDP
growth is slipping in world rankings.
Technological advances have always been a key driver of
growth and rising income
per capita, yet some fear that this time will be different.
High performance in this category, either in terms of
growth or the level of
per capita income, does not guarantee a high quality of life.
«This report discusses how tax structures can best be designed to support GDP
per capita growth.The analysis suggests a tax and economic
growth ranking order according to which corporate taxes are the most harmful type of tax for economic
growth, followed by personal income taxes and then consumption taxes, with recurrent taxes on immovable residential property being the least harmful tax.
The most important determinant of a country's
per capita income, over the longer term, is the level of and
growth in productivity.
This model generates the price of gold as a function of the global investment yield required to produce a constant real after - tax return equal to long - term real
growth in global GDP
per capita.
The demand for services in the Building Exterior Cleaners industry cum window cleaning line of business is on the increase in recent time, as
growth in household formation rates expanded the available clientele base for industry players and rising
per capita disposable income enabled consumers to purchase cleaning services they put off during the recession.
As Friedman and Schwartz admit, the decade from 1869 to 1879 saw a 3 - percent - perannum increase in money national product, an outstanding real national product
growth of 6.8 percent
per year in this period, and a phenomenal rise of 4.5 percent
per year in real product
per capita.
Had the Liberals, after 2000, held spending
growth to a rate sufficient to cover increases in population and inflation — that is, had they held spending constant in real
per capita terms — they would have left the Tories with a budget of $ 148 billion in fiscal 2006, instead of the $ 175 billion it turned out to be.
As a result, there has been very little
growth in real income
per capita since 2008.
If the Illinois General Assembly would simply restrict the
growth of state spending to 2.89 percent (the average annual
growth in Illinois» gross domestic product
per capita since 2000), Illinois would be on its way to paying off its backlog of bills and eventually repealing the income tax hike.
These policy trends, as well as the tendency of consumption to increase its share within GDP as
per -
capita GDP rises, suggest that mass - market consumer spending should grow materially faster than overall GDP
growth.
The rate of
growth in real disposable household income
per capita is only 0.9 percent
per year.
As well, its five - year average
growth rates for real GDP
per capita and after - tax income are fairly solid by North American standards.