The party has also pledged to increase the Early Years Pupil Premium to reach # 1000
per child on free school meals.
Not exact matches
Note: The House of Representatives is expected to vote this week (and possibly even today)
on the Healthy, Hunger -
Free Kids Act, the Senate bill that reauthorizes the
Child Nutrition Act and which will, if passed, increase
school food funding by 6 cents
per meal.
The report highlights two French
schools, one where the cost of a
meal is $ 5 or $ 6
per student, about twice what the U.S. federal government pays
schools for
children on free lunch, and another where the chef works with about half that amount.
All
schools in Wales now receive # 450
per child, aged 5 - 15,
on free school meals.
It is for all these reasons and more that President Barack Obama signed the Healthy, Hunger -
Free Kids Act of 2010
on December 13, 2010, a law that will not only change the nutritional guidelines of the 65 - year - old National
School Lunch Program, but will also provide the program's first noninflationary budget increase in more than three decades; a total of $ 4.5 billion over 10 years, which includes an additional 6 cents
per meal,
per child.
Children on free school meals achieve almost half a GCSE grade less in Attainment 8 core subjects than more affluent pupils, according to the report, and 88
per cent of this gap is believed to be due to differences between pupils at the same
school.
He also referenced the fact that the attainment gap at GCSE level in Hackney between
children on free school meals and those who are not is 14.6
per cent, compared to a 34
per cent gap in Kent, which operates a selective system.
However, research by the National Union of Teachers (NUT) and the charity
Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) shows that primary
schools with more than 40
per cent of
children on free school meals will
on average lose # 473
per pupil.
Based
on the incidence of pupils receiving
free school meals (FSM), the primary
schools with most
children on FSM will lose # 530
per pupil
on average compared to # 351 for the primary
schools with fewest pupils
on FSM.
The research also failed to find a «significant positive impact»
on social mobility, and in fact found that the gap between the proportion of
children on free school meals attaining five A * to C GCSEs including English and maths and all other
children was actually wider in selective areas (34.1
per cent) than in non-selective areas (27.8
per cent).
Research shows that,
on average, the proportion of pupils in grammar
schools who are eligible for
free school meals is less than 3
per cent, and the Labour MP Lisa Nandy (pictured top) warned today that the government's proposals could see it «inflict an experiment»
on millions of
children based
on «flimsy evidence» in favour of grammars.
Their research found that, in 2002, 22
per cent of
children on free school meals in London gained five or more A * - C GCSEs, including English and Maths.
«That's why the proportion of disadvantaged
children at grammar
schools is extremely low, just 2.6
per cent of kids
on free school meals,» Powell said.