Sentences with phrase «per point stays»

Not exact matches

You get three points per dollar whenever you use the card to book stays with Stash Hotel Reward partners.

You earn 1x points per dollar on regular spending and 2x points during stays at Starwood and Marriott hotels.

During an SPG stay, patrons can earn 2 - 4 points per $ 1 spent.

You will no longer earn points on gas purchases, but, anytime you need to fly, rent a car, or stay at a hotel, you will earn 3 points per $ 1.

At 1 cent per point, your rewards rate is a solid 2 % for as long as you stay below $ 50,000 in annual purchases.

At 2.1 cents per point, only the Starwood Preferred Guest Program has a higher value for points being used toward free stays at hotels.

The IHG ® Rewards Club Select Credit Card earns 5 points per dollar when you stay at IHG hotels, 2 points at gas stations, grocery stores, and restaurants, and 1 point on other purchases.

Where the Starwood Preferred Guest ® Credit Card from American Express points are worth 2.4 cents per point, Wyndham points are around a penny each when redeemed for hotel stays.

We extract the value per point through the Marriott Rewards card by dividing the dollar cost of a stay by the same cost in points.

You will earn 5X points per dollar for Ritz - Carlton, Marriott and SPG stays; 2X points on airfare purchased directly with an airline, car rentals, and spending at restaurants; and 1X points on all other purchases.

With the Chase Ritz - Carlton Rewards ® Credit Card, you can earn 5 points per $ 1 for Ritz - Carlton and partner hotel stays, plus 2 points per $ 1 for travel and restaurant purchases.

Alabama stays No. 1 comfortably, receiving 64 of 87 first - place votes and outpacing No. 2 Oregon (four first - place votes) by more than a point per ballot, 24.37 to 23.20.

Indiana ended the year allowing the fewest points per 100 possessions, and while every good defensive team has a series of ethos that stay consistent, the Pacers, more than any other team, rely on a series of schemes that rarely change significantly.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

It is not that hard if you add a bit of FOS to your yogurt or smoothies (adds a nice sweetness, but use no more than 5 - 10 g per serving or you better stay close to a toilet; — RRB - and make a point to eat foods particularly high in soluble fiber (like oat bran and flax seed).

There is a point at which looking for the silver linings in bad news — and make no mistake, even if The Good Dinosaur is Pixar's best film in years, and even if Bob Peterson stays at Pixar and ends up shepherding another project to completion successfully years from now, this isn't good news, per se — becomes a bit exhausting.

In urban schools students come and go all day.No 45 minutes is like the time that preceded it or the time that will follow.Urban schools report 125 classroom interruptions per week.Announcements, students going, students coming, messengers, safety aides, and intrusions by other school staff account for just some of these interruptions.It is not unusual for students to stay on task only 5 or 10 minutes in every hour.Textbook companies and curriculum reformers are constantly thwarted by this reality.They sell their materials to schools with the assurance that all the students will learn X amount in Y time.They are continually dismayed to observe that an hour of school time is not an hour of learning time.Many insightful observers of life in urban schools have pointed out that it is incredibly naive to believe that learning of subject matter is the main activity occurring in these schools.If one observes the activities and events which actually transpire — minute by minute, hour by hour, day in and day out — it is not possible to reasonably conclude that learning is the primary activity of youth attending urban schools.What does the process of changing what one does every 45 minutes and even the place where one does it portend for fulfilling a job in the world of work?If one is constantly being reinforced in the behaviors of coming, going, and being interrupted, what kind of work is one being prepared for?

But when points and miles are redeemed strategically for high value award flights and luxury hotel stays, then it is often possible to receive three to five cents in value per point, which is much better than the best cash back reward cards.

The average point value for the Wyndham Rewards when used for hotel stays is around 1 cent per point, though your actual rate can vary pretty wildly.

Where the Starwood Preferred Guest ® Credit Card from American Express points are worth 2.4 cents per point, Wyndham points are around a penny each when redeemed for hotel stays.

If you redeem reward points for hotel stays at SPG ® properties, you can reach redemption rate up to 2 cents per 1 points.

Of course, you can redeem points at La Quinta Returns hotels starting from 6,000 points per stay.

Earn points: Earn 10 points per $ 1 spent or 1,000 points on every qualified stay (whichever is greater).

If you get a Stash Hotel Rewards credit card, you earn 3 points per $ 1 spent at Stash partner hotels; 2 points per $ 1 spent on stays at all other hotels, dining out and gas; and 1 point per $ 1 spent on all other purchases.

The amount of points needed to redeem for a free hotel stay will depend on the type of property and its location within the range of 6,000 - 24,000 points per stay.

You get to earn 5 points per dollar when paying for those and SPG hotels, plus free upgrades to the Ritz - Calrton Club Level when you stay at these properties (up to 3 times annually).

1 extra Membership Rewards point per dollar spent (only applies to prepaid hotel stays or stays booked as part of a vacation package)

Gold members earn 3 points per $ 1 spent, and Platinum members earn 3 or 4 points per $ 1 spent, depending on the particular stay.

Better yet, free hotel stays at SPG properties start at just 2,000 per night — and even higher end Category 4 properties are just 10,000 points per night.

This card also has up to 1,200 bonus ThankYou Points per year for paying on time and staying under your credit limit and you can earn points for every $ 1 spent at restaurants, books, music, movies and 1 point for every $ 1 spent on all other purcPoints per year for paying on time and staying under your credit limit and you can earn points for every $ 1 spent at restaurants, books, music, movies and 1 point for every $ 1 spent on all other purcpoints for every $ 1 spent at restaurants, books, music, movies and 1 point for every $ 1 spent on all other purchases.

We extract the value per point through the Marriott Rewards card by dividing the dollar cost of a stay by the same cost in points.

13 points per $ 1 on Best Western stays (10 points as a Best Western Rewards ® member, 3 points for using your Best Western Rewards ® Mastercard ®) 2 points per $ 1 spent everywhere else *

For example, if you used the Ritz - Carlton Rewards ® Credit Card to pay for a $ 1,000 stay at their hotel, you'll get 5,000 points (5x per $ 1).

If the dividends per share were reinvested and remained constant while the stock price never recovered and stayed 20 % below its purchase price, this seemingly unfortunate investment would eventually become more profitable after 18.9 years (red highlight, intersection point between 5 % dividend yield and 20 % price decline) than if those same dividends were reinvested and the stock price had remained the same throughout the period.

When redeemed for hotel stays, Starpoints ® will be worth of around 2 cents per point.

With the Chase Ritz - Carlton Rewards ® Credit Card, you can earn 5 points per $ 1 for Ritz - Carlton and partner hotel stays, plus 2 points per $ 1 for travel and restaurant purchases.

Like most loyalty rewards, Starpoints will vary in their value but on average are worth an astounding 2.4 cents per point when used towards hotel stays.

Particularly, the rewards program give one point for every dollar you charge on the card and two points per dollar for charging for staying at participating Starwood properties and retail outlets.

Normally qualifying for Gold Elite status requires staying 10 nights per year at IHG hotels or earning 10,000 Elite qualifying points per year.

With an average point value of 2.1 cents per point when used toward hotel stays, only the Starwood Preferred Guest program rivals it.

The Marriott Rewards loyalty program will grant you 600 travel points for each eligible stay to redeem for Southwest Airlines flights and 10 Marriott points per $ 1 spent on room rates and qualifying charges at Marriott.

Earn 3 points per $ 1 spent on eligible purchases for every participating hotel stay, Wyndham Vacation Rental North America properties, and on - property spend and maintenance fees at Wyndham timeshare properties.

You earn 10 points per $ 1 spent when you stay at an IHG hotel, 2 points per $ 1 spent on purchases at gas stations, grocery stores, and restaurants and 1 point per $ 1 spent on all other purchases.

Or splurge on 2 nights at a category 6 hotel (25,000 points per night), like the Grand Hyatt Kauai Resort and Spa where Emily and I stayed.

Current bonus: 25,000 bonus Starpoints after you use your new card to make $ 3,000 in purchases within the first three months Earning rates: 2 points per dollar spent at SPG hotels; 1 point per dollar spent everywhere else Other benefits: No foreign transaction fees; 2 stays and 5 nights toward SPG elite status every year; free in - room premium internet; Boingo Wi - Fi Annual fee: $ 95 (waived for the first year)

We will show how you can get more than 1.25 miles per point and get a free hotel stay.

Furthermore, the using your Amtrak points to pay for Starwood hotel stays is also unfavorable to consumers - resulting in a per - point value well below $ 0.01.

With Marriott Gold Status you get room upgrades, 10 % off weekend stays, 25 % more Marriott points per stay and many more.

Members earn 1 point per $ 1 on purchases, with the opportunity to double up on points when you use your card to book flights or hotel stays through American Express Travel.

However, if you're a Big Spender who already earns Hilton status by staying in Hilton hotels or who spends $ 40,000 on the American Express Surpass card, you could be better off spending on the Virgin Atlantic card (up to $ 25,000 a calender year) and earning 4.2 Hilton points per $ 1 spent.