Sentences with phrase «per point this way»

Generally speaking you should expect the highest dollar value per point this way.

You only get one cent per point this way.

Not exact matches

Their defense has fallen all the way to 29th in the league, and they are just 0.1 point per 100 possessions better defensively than the 14 - 33 Sacramento Kings.

One - way flights are often more expensive on a per - mile basis than round - trip, but they don't require extra points.

The S&P / TSX composite index advanced 207.35 points or 1.38 per cent to 15,241.88, with materials and gold stocks leading the way.

While this can be a great way to travel without having to pay with cash, the redemption rate is pretty lackluster at 0.7 cents per point.

The Ink Preferred may only have a maximum bonus rate of 3 points per $ 1, but, there are more ways to earn bonus points.

The rewards are decent: 5 points per dollar on airfare and hotels when booked the right way (terms apply) and 1 point per dollar elsewhere.

The common habit of using the Bible by concentrating on one verse at a time (which may or may not be a complete sentence) is at best a very slow, plodding way to get at the author's main points, rather like playing dominoes or checkers at the rate of one or two moves per day or per week, and at worst a fragmentation and distortion.

This incredibly simple Caprese Chicken Recipe tastes way too good to be made so easily and have just 5 Points per serving.

The dough recipe is for two pizzas, 8 slices per pizza and just 2 smart points for the pizza dough per slice — you could totally skip the cheese, or reduce the cheese by half, add way more veggies — the sky is the limit.

(Even with the way Michigan's defense was fading, scoring 41 points and averaging 5.9 yards per play is impressive against that unit.)

George broke out last year, averaging 21.6 points, 6.7 rebounds, 3.5 assists and 1.9 steal per game on his way to an All - NBA third team berth and All - Defensive first team spot.

Along the way, Johnson averaged nearly 14 points and four assists per game and made 79 3 - pointers.

He shot 60 percent on twos, 40 percent on threes, and 80 percent on free throws on his way to averaging 19 points per game.

The Wizards allowed nearly 120 points per 100 possessions this season when that combo shared the floor, by the way.

Combined with the offense averaging 9.7 yards per play, it is difficult to see how Tech's first game of 2012 could have gone much better; only turnovers (Northwestern State was plus - 11.8 in turnover points margin, as defined here) failed to go Tech's way.

Evans played his way into the national spotlight on a floundering, injury - riddled Grizzlies team, averaging 19.5 points, five rebounds and five assists per game on much - improved shooting percentages of 45 percent from the field and a 39 percent clip from downtown.

DeMar DeRozan leads the way with 27 points per game for the Raptors, who averaged 122 points per contest in the first two games of the series.

Ranked 11th in the preseason polls, the Cardinal figured out creative ways to blow scoring chances — they rank 110th in Points Per Scoring Opportunity (first downs inside the opponent's 40)-- and suffered three three - point losses (to USC, Notre Dame, and Utah) as a result.

They would average just 14.8 points per game on their way to a 3 - 9 record.

Scoring 41 points in the Spartans» first game, the 6» 11» forward averaged 14 points per game the rest of the way, but it wasn't enough to beat Connecticut in the Elite 8.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Along the way, she averaged 13.3 points, 8.5 rebounds and 2.3 blocks per game.

Last season, when his reduced role in the offense (14.6 points per game) first became a public issue, he was remarkably even - tempered, and he has been that way this season, even as the cry for his scalp (so to speak) has grown.

With 28.3 points per game, 8.7 assists, and 7.9 rebounds, James is taking care of business in just about every way imaginable.

Though with Lucas» importance being highlighted in recent weeks with an incredible stat revealing Liverpool have a points per game ratio almost three times better when the Brazilian features it would surely take a big sum to convince Brendan Rodgers it was time to part ways with Leiva.

Shooting mainly from outside, frequently way outside, the 5» 11», 165 - pound Houston has averaged 31 points per game, or 46 % of Army's output, despite having a body that looks vaguely as if it has not yet fully formed.

Millsap was named an All - Star reserve on his way to averaging a career - best 18.1 points, 7.7 rebounds, and nearly four assists per game in Atlanta.

All three are averaging double figures in points with Williams leading the way at 14.8 per game.

Embiid hit the first shot of the game — a pull - up jumper, naturally — and overpowered Brooklyn's defense on his way to 1.5 points per minute.

Surrounded by three seniors and Cunningham, he averaged a team - high 18.4 points per game in Big East play on his way to being named the league's Rookie of the Year.

The way I understand it, he didn't mean to say that Mayweather was «shot» per se, but that Pacquiao has regressed much more than Mayweather at this point.

The undefeated Warriors have been must - watch television and Curry has led the way with an incredible 32.1 points, 5.9 assists and 5.1 rebounds per game.

A trio of freshmen led the way to the No. 1 seed as Rick Barros III (17.2 points and 8.4 rebounds per game) received plenty of support from the backcourt pairing of B.J. Askew (15.9 ppg) and Jayce McCain (15.1 ppg).

Tibesar's position group helped Wisconsin's defensive unit rank No. 1 in total defense (253.2 yards per game) and team passing efficiency defense (96.31), No. 2 in rushing defense (92.6 yards per game), and No. 3 in scoring defense (13.2 points per game) on way to a 12 - 1 record and a Capital One Orange Bowl berth against Miami.

The yards per point measurement is one of the most effective ways to beat the bookmakers.

He's old school in the worst of ways, and if not for the incompetence of a couple other coaches his Bears would be last in NFL scoring with their 15.9 points per game (PPG).

Sophomore guard Kyle Guy leads the way for the Cavaliers with 14.3 points per game, senior guard Devon Hall averages 11.7 points per game, and sophomore guard Ty Jerome gets 10.5 per game while leading the team in assists.

The «breeder males» don't have much incentive to change anything or even question the way things work as they're getting their sexual needs met per the list of 20 points above.

You can also earn loyalty points when shopping with online stores — usually a point per dollar spent, but some stores offer ways to earn extra points beyond your spending level.

The Tories were down three points to 36 per cent, and way ahead of Labour who also fell three points to 24 per cent.

«The point is you don't have to choose between beautiful, safe, affordable» or something that «oh by the way, gets 100 miles per gallon of fuel equivalent.»

The caloric goal you should aim for is 15 to 17 calories per pound of bodyweight as a starting point, after which you are free to tweak it any way you want to see how the body will respond.

Others point out eating three meals per day is the most common pattern of eating in industrialised countries but there is no evidence this is the best way to consume nutrition or that it has any evolutionary history.

Sampling in this way means that single data points are recorded 1,000 — 2,000 times per second.

I'm also very happy that I found yet another way to wear my orange leather skirt — it was a guilty purchase in a month I should rather have been saving money, so I make a point of wearing it often in order to reduce its cost per wear to a minimum.

I don't have a list per se, but at one point I was trying to cook my way through this series on Epicurious called «Around the world in 80 dishes»... it was the signature dish from each country and I loved it!

Hand out a graph per student as they enter the room (I keep anonymous unless they want to write their name on the back) Inform them what challenge is - a little out of their comfort zone get students to plot the points of their learning journey throughout the lesson This is a great way to reflect on your teaching - was their enough challenge.

Accordingly, and also per the research, this is not getting much better in that, as per the authors of this article as well as many other scholars, (1) «the variance in value - added scores that can be attributed to teacher performance rarely exceeds 10 percent; (2) in many ways «gross» measurement errors that in many ways come, first, from the tests being used to calculate value - added; (3) the restricted ranges in teacher effectiveness scores also given these test scores and their limited stretch, and depth, and instructional insensitivity — this was also at the heart of a recent post whereas in what demonstrated that «the entire range from the 15th percentile of effectiveness to the 85th percentile of [teacher] effectiveness [using the EVAAS] cover [ed] approximately 3.5 raw score points [given the tests used to measure value - added];» (4) context or student, family, school, and community background effects that simply can not be controlled for, or factored out; (5) especially at the classroom / teacher level when students are not randomly assigned to classrooms (and teachers assigned to teach those classrooms)... although this will likely never happen for the sake of improving the sophistication and rigor of the value - added model over students» «best interests.»