Not exact matches
It could raise # 1.5 billion
per year for the
pupil premium — and would also help to stop the
funding gap between state and private schools widening sharply, and setting social mobility back.
The freeze on charters»
per -
pupil funding won't officially end for another year, but these innovative public schools will get direct state grants to reduce the
gap this year — and also get markedly more facilities
funding.
The resulting «
funding gap» is the difference between
per -
pupil revenues in poor and rich districts.
Camden had the largest
per -
pupil funding gap in our study, with charter schools students receiving 45 %, or $ 14,771, less
per pupil than TPS students.
But California continues to dwell in the cellar of national
per -
pupil funding — a persistent stinginess that many say has exacerbated an opportunity
gap that this year earned the state a C in school finance, a D - plus in K - 12 Achievement and a dismal 36th place finish in Education Week's 2018 Quality Counts national performance report card.
On average the
funding gap between high - and low - poverty schools is $ 582
per pupil.
Worse, under this new formula, the
gap between district and charter
per pupil funding will continue to grow.
The
per -
pupil funding increases they've granted will help close Connecticut's worst - in - the - nation achievement
gap, and the money for more charters will act as a lifeline for the 65,000 Connecticut kids still stuck in failing public schools.
The school has a 9
per cent
gap in expected progress in English and a 10
per cent
gap in maths between
pupil premium and non-
pupil premium
funded students, something that Mrs Skinner said Claydon was working hard to reduce further.
«Given that one of the goals of the constitutional initiative is to narrow the
gap in
per pupil funding to the average of the top ten states, California still has a long way to go in school finance,» the coalition said.
The new
funding begins to close that
gap, by providing $ 245
per pupil for low - income students and $ 131
per pupil for wealthier students.
Although school
funding was maintained in real - terms
per pupil under the Coalition Government, all additional funding was provided via the Pupil Premium, targeted at particular pupils and therefore distributed unevenly.2 Many schools had to use Pupil Premium funding simply to plug the gaps caused by cuts in the value of other fun
pupil under the Coalition Government, all additional
funding was provided via the
Pupil Premium, targeted at particular pupils and therefore distributed unevenly.2 Many schools had to use Pupil Premium funding simply to plug the gaps caused by cuts in the value of other fun
Pupil Premium, targeted at particular
pupils and therefore distributed unevenly.2 Many schools had to use
Pupil Premium funding simply to plug the gaps caused by cuts in the value of other fun
Pupil Premium
funding simply to plug the
gaps caused by cuts in the value of other
funding.
In addition to increasing
funding to help close the
per -
pupil funding gap between charter and district schools, Connecticut lawmakers were able to expand an innovative district / charter partnership program to more than 30 districts and provide
funding to offer more new charter school seats to the nearly 4,000 kids stuck on waitlists.
In keeping with their promises in last year's education reform law, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy and the General Assembly committed to helping close the
per -
pupil funding gap that treats charter students like second - class citizens, and also secured
funding for more charter schools.
Historically, the
gap has exceeded $ 600
per pupil in base state operating
funds.
There are still many inequities facing public charter school students in Connecticut — including a sizable difference in
per -
pupil funding — but, common - sense collaborations like these can help close that
gap and give more children access to quality public schools.
One suggested reason is a
funding gap, with the National Union of Teachers saying # 500 less is spent
per pupil in Wales than in England.
And since California has seen its
per -
pupil funding fall since 2009, the
funding gap is likely higher.
She slammed the New York school system for being «the second most unequal in the country,» noting that there is a $ 10,000
per -
pupil funding gap between students in the wealthiest versus poorest school districts.
The extension of the
funding, worth # 1,900
per pupil, will help to close the attainment
gap and transform
pupil's future life chances across -LSB-...]