That has a very low
percentage chance of working especially on social media like Facebook or Twitter.
Not exact matches
I actually got the
chance to talk to their main water expert and I quizzed him incessantly about how the filter
worked, the
percentage of contaminants it removed and filter life, and was even more impressed.
Consider, for instance, the
work of Patrick Wolf at the University
of Arkansas, who has examined the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship and found that it led to improved reading achievement among participants while also increasing a student's
chance of graduating high school by 21
percentage points.
Forgo the higher price point and the stronger royalty
percentages to satisfy reader desires (and if you do the math, authors earn less money with trade pb until the tipping point), or go for the hardcover, get more support and have a higher
chance of earning out that advance (or the greater risk
of failure if it doesn't
work).
Spencer, that's why I acknowledge in the article that some authors build a platform simply by publishing but, unfortunately, that will only
work for a very very small
percentage of authors, so it simply seems smart to me to do something to increase our
chances of success.
If the editor has done all this
work, and he thinks your book needs three pages
of sex, and the only way he's going to get paid is
percentage, then you just put yourself in the same position as with traditional publishing, where you have to take the
chance this editor hit the vision just right and will make it better and not truncate it or castrate it.
Unfortunately, a high
percentage of readers still do not understand how to get that book into their ereaders, and authors spend far too much time fielding emails from confused subscribers, who unsubscribe before they really have a
chance to try out the author's
work.