The award - receiving group is
a percentage of that comparison group, and it is not affected by the test scores in another subject.
Not exact matches
For 2 -
group comparisons, a 2 × 2 Yates corrected χ2 test was used to evaluate the statistical significance
of group differences
of percentages of unscored applications and
percentages of funded applications.
Across 21
comparisons (seven sites with three racial
groups each), we find only two cases in which the average difference between the sending TPS and the receiving charter school is greater than 10
percentage points in the concentration
of the transferring student's race.
For example,
comparisons of the transcripts
of 1990 and 2009 high school graduates reveal that larger
percentages of 2009 graduates from all major racial and ethnic
groups completed a rigorous curriculum than did comparable 1990 graduates, and, on average, 2009 graduates completed about 420 more hours
of coursework than did 1990 graduates.
Comparisons are based on statistical tests that consider both the magnitude
of the difference between the
group average scores or
percentages and the standard errors
of those statistics.
Create a Database: A database is created and used to make
comparisons of all results, such as scale scores, percentiles,
percentages at or above achievement levels, and
comparisons between
groups and between years for a
group.
We entered the number
of patients and control
group members, mean age,
percentage of girls and
of members
of ethnic minorities, the country
of data collection, year
of publication, type
of illness, duration
of illness, the sampling procedure (1 = probability samples, 0 = convenience samples), the use
of a control
group (0 = yes, 1 =
comparison with test norms), equivalence
of patients and control
group (1 = yes, 2 = not tested, 3 = no), the rater
of depressive symptoms (1 = child, 2 = parent, 3 = teacher, 4 = clinician), the measurement
of the variables, and the standardized size
of between -
group differences in depressive symptoms.
EIP showed favorable impacts on 8 outcomes, including fewer days and episodes
of hospitalization, relative to those in the
comparison group, covering a range
of 6 weeks to 2 years postpartum.13, 23,24 EIP also showed a favorable effect on the
percentage of children who were adequately immunized by 1 year, but the difference was no longer statistically significant by 2 years.13, 24 Early Start demonstrated favorable effects on 3 outcomes, including
percentage who received well - child visits and dental service.25 — 27 HFA had favorable results for 4 health care outcomes, such as the number
of well - child visits and whether the child had health insurance.28 — 31 HFA had an unfavorable effect on the number
of pediatric emergency department (ED) visits.32 The research showed that Healthy Steps had a beneficial effect on 2 outcomes: 1 - month well - child visits and diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, and pertussis vaccinations.33 Finally, NFP had favorable results on 3 outcomes measuring the number
of ED visits at different follow - ups but an unfavorable / ambiguous effect on number
of days hospitalized between 25 and 50 months.34, 35 The research on 2 programs (Oklahoma's CBFRS and PAT) showed no effects on measures
of health care use or coverage.36 — 40 The research on 5 programs (Child FIRST, EHS, Family Check - Up, HIPPY, and PALS for Infants) did not report health care coverage or usage outcomes.
Result showed that parents in the treatment
group improved significantly on the parenting skill taught by the program and the
percentage of compliant behaviors shown by the children also increased significantly in
comparison to the control
group.
Percentage scores are based on
comparisons with a norm
group of over 50,000 couples.
The high
percentage of women who were very unsatisfied or unsatisfied (43 %) with their marital satisfaction needs more in - depth clarification
of marital life in this
group, in particular, but, also in
comparison with women
of other professions and from the general population.