Not exact matches
LHV now has more points
than any
other team in the AHL and rank 2nd in points
percentage behind Toronto.
Very often, our RZ
percentage is close to the
other team's, but that number is misleading because the
other team gets there more often
than we do.
That's a nifty.909 point
percentage, while no
other team has done better against Chicago
than Washington's.700 mark (7 -3-0, minimum two games).
Their 66.4 point
percentage in the regular season was 17 points better
than any
other expansion
team since the league grew to something resembling its modern membership in 1967 - 68.
Although our numbers have the ticket
percentages evenly split for Saturday's Seahawks / Falcons game, Cooley reported that the public has been hammering Seattle more
than any
other team this weekend.
Add to this that a greater
percentage of our goals have come from set pieces
than any
other team in the Premier League and it does not paint a rosy picture of sexy football at any time during the season.
Part of this problem could be considered to be that the most used central midfield pairing, Lucas Leiva and Charlie Adam, aren't particularly dynamic nor inclined to get on the end of crosses (of which Liverpool have had more, per game,
than any
other team in the league apart from Wolves — more of which, will be discussed later), so this only leaves a certain number of players who will be able to get into the box in the more rigid 4 -4-2 utilised for most of this season. Inspite of this, however, 58 % of Liverpool's goals have come from inside the 18 yard box, the highest in the league so far this season in terms of
percentage of goals scored by each individual
team, suggesting that this is the best avenue of attack for Liverpool, so the question has to be: why have Liverpool only managed to score 14 times, the 10th lowest amount of goals in the league?
May I suggest that: a) «the MLS game» (list low, hold offers 5 - 15 days & scramble to get your own offer in the meantime); b) the prevalence of simultaneous presentation of 5 - 50 competing bids (full info on all bids only known by Seller Agent); c) the new - prominence of
Teams / mega-
Teams / office - within - an - office sub-Brokerages; d) the often «coached - from - afar» suggestions about how Registrants can maximize GCI, minimize expenses and offset competition - induced, listing - fee discounts; e) Average Prices resulting in everyday Co-op Brokerage fees of $ 15K, 20K and more and f) the high
percentage of Registrants who have not experienced any market conditions
other than «Prices perpetually Up, Seller always Wins, Buyer puts - up or Shuts - up»; g) Electronic signification — you can no longer look in the whites of your competitor's eyes, because half of them aren't even physically present.