I'll add the point that Dan Sage's phrasing only is true when you have
perfect knowledge of reality.
Not exact matches
To «know all that exists» is, in one sense, to have
perfect knowledge, it is literal omniscience (provided possibilities are also known as such, as a special class
of existences or, at least,
of realities).
Hartshorne replies that if one demands that
perfect knowledge include
knowledge of exactly what the future will hold then he is denying the distinctive
reality of freedom.
so there is no basis for the hatred for the priests who offered up the most
perfect sacrifice ever!!!! except for you and the many like you who have no idea or
knowledge of salvation in its»
reality....
If perception is how we view
reality and we are striving for
knowledge that is rooted in
reality as it is, then to be sure we need our presentation
of reality (perception) to be
perfect.