Here's a one year chart of this ETF showing
its performance against the index itself:
Not exact matches
Four years ago the firm developed a» Bain
Index,» which charts the
performance of Bain client stocks
against various
indexes.
In August, the investment firm Richard Bernstein Advisors compared the
performance of the average investor — based on the monthly flows of money in and out of mutual funds —
against a variety of stock
indexes, commodities and other asset classes over a 20 - year period ending Dec. 31, 2013.
The increasing bullish momentum in the financial ETF we mentioned last Friday can be easily seen on the percentage change chart below, which compares the
performance of S&P Select Financial SPDR ($ XLF)
against the S&P 500 SPDR ($ SPY), a popular ETF proxy that tracks the
performance of the broad - based S&P 500
Index:
An
index is a collection of specific stocks or bonds that the industry uses as a benchmark for investors (like mutual funds) to measure how their
performance stacks up
against the «overall market segment»
performance.
The firm's proprietary Organizational Health
Index, for example, allows companies to benchmark their own
performance against a massive database of McKinsey's 600 clients worldwide — on a confidential basis, of course.
To understand the effect of this modest shortfall in stock selection
performance over the past 8 months, recall that when the Fund is hedged
against the impact of market fluctuations (and provided that our long - put / short - call
index option combinations have identical strike prices and expirations), its returns are roughly equal to:
U.S. DOLLAR VERUS OTHER MAJOR CURRENCIES The United States Dollar
Index or DXY measures the
performance of the dollar
against a basket of other currencies including EUR, JPY, GBP, CAD, CHF and SEK.
The chart below shows DBC's
performance in 2012
against the
performance of a front - month «
index» I constructed based on single - commodity front - month futures
indexes weighted with DBC's current weights.
In my view, a 20 year or longer horizon is where the
performance of a company should be compared
against the benchmark
index.
The leading
performance benchmark for this strategy is the CBOE S&P 500 PutWrite
Index (PUT), an index that measures the performance of a hypothetical portfolio that sells one - month S&P 500 ® Index (SPX) put options against collateralized cash reserves -LSB
Index (PUT), an
index that measures the performance of a hypothetical portfolio that sells one - month S&P 500 ® Index (SPX) put options against collateralized cash reserves -LSB
index that measures the
performance of a hypothetical portfolio that sells one - month S&P 500 ®
Index (SPX) put options against collateralized cash reserves -LSB
Index (SPX) put options
against collateralized cash reserves -LSB-...]
Sports Insights is now publishing a Sports Investing
Index, which reflects the
performance of Betting
Against the Public when applying contrarian value approaches to major US sports, focusing on our Square Play sports betting system.
When comparing the Pacifica Hybrid
against all crossovers and SUVs in a head to head assessment, the Pacifica Hybrid closely followed the Tesla Model X in ASG's Environmental
Performance Index, and came in ahead of all crossovers and SUVs with conventional powertrains, including those that are half its size.
With same database of oldest share class fund
performance from Funds That Beat The Market, I ranked funds by Sharpe, Sortino, and Martin (or so - called Ulcer Performance) indices then compared against relative AP
performance from Funds That Beat The Market, I ranked funds by Sharpe, Sortino, and Martin (or so - called Ulcer
Performance) indices then compared against relative AP
Performance)
indices then compared
against relative APR rankings.
One example where counterparty risk is relevant is in Synthetic ETFs since the ETF provider enters into a swap agreement with a counterparty (usually an investment bank) such that the investment bank agrees to pay the
performance of an
index against a basket of investments which the ETF provider holds.
Indexation of any kind changes the behavior of investment managers who inevitably get their
performance measured
against an
index.
The swap (i.e. an exchange transaction) is entered into with a counterparty and the collateral is held
against the
performance of the underlying
index.
That's the most appropriate way to measure an ETF's
performance against its benchmark
index, but it may not be the return investors actually obtain in their own accounts.
You would compare its
performance against the TSX 60, an
index that focuses on large cap Canadian stocks.
S&P 500 is a widely recognized stock
index, that many people benchmark
performance against, and you can find «passive management» funds that compete to replicate it at as low a fee as possible.
Benchmarking
against an
index is really the best way to objectively evaluate investment
performance.
You say, «The Total Relative
performance, therefore, is the average
performance of each stock
against the
performance of the S&P 500
index for the same periods.»
Go beyond basic
performance data, review advanced statistics and ratios for each program; benchmark
against various
indexes.
Will the
performance numbers be measured
against an appropriate
index?
Index funds offer you probably the ideal hedge
against varying
performance across sectors and across fund managers over longer - periods of time.
However, both types of returns are not ideal choices for investors who are interested in benchmarking their
performance against appropriate
indices.
Some industry experts believe managed account
performance should not be benchmarked
against an
index but instead
against an investor's unique individual goals.
Charts comparing the
performance of the Robo I Strategy
against a typical 60/40 stock / bond portfolio allocation and the i3, an
index that represents the average returns of the do - it - yourself investor.
The S&P
Indices Versus Active (SPIVA ®) Latin America Scorecard is a semi-annual report that compares the
performance of active mutual funds in Latin America
against passive benchmarks.
By using this popular
index and the financial products tied to it, you can measure your portfolio's relative
performance, invest in the equity market, hedge
against risk, and even lever up your exposure.
Institutional bond investors often use the
indexes as a benchmark
against which to measure their
performance.
Market - capitalization based
indexes have served a useful purpose as indicators of broad market
performance and as benchmarks
against which to measure active manager
performance.
The chart will refresh itself to display your portfolio's
performance index against your selected benchmark.
The firms will be evaluated on their
performance, after fees,
against the portfolio benchmark (Barclays Capital US Aggregate Bond
Index) over a full market cycle of highs and lows at an acceptable level of risk.
He pits the
performance of professional investment managers
against that of market
indices and finds that: Keep Reading
Monitor your investments and compare their
performances against the market
index.
The S&P
Indices Versus Active (SPIVA) India Scorecard, which is a biannual report, attempts to capture the
performance of active funds (both equity and debt funds) domiciled in India
against S&P BSE benchmarks over different time horizons.
Those who favor active investing have pointed to the small cap premium as a justification for their activity, and during the periods of history when small cap companies outperformed the market, it did make them look like heroes but it quickly gave rise to a counterforce, where
performance measurement services (like Morningstar) started incorporating portfolio tilts, comparing small cap funds
against small cap
indices.
Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the
performance of an investment
against a market
index or benchmark which is considered to represent the market's movement as a whole.
As long as you're already pretty honest & self - critical in your investing, examining your
performance against regular
indices probably won't be too rewarding or revealing.
Many exchange - traded funds that passive investors use tend to follow the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^ GSPC) as a benchmark, tracking their
performance against the venerable
index and seeking to match the market's overall gains.
Indexes and averages serve as useful benchmarks
against which investors can measure the
performance of their own portfolios.
The Montgomery Fund's relative out -
performance against its benchmark, the S&P / ASX 300 Accumulation
Index, was 12.7 per cent.
In my view, a 20 year or longer horizon is where the
performance of a company should be compared
against the benchmark
index.
The position amounts to less than 1 % of assets, and most of the day - to - day fluctuation in the Fund tends to be attributable to differences in the
performance of the stocks held by the Fund and the
indices we use to hedge, but we expect the higher - strike put options to fortify our defense
against the risk of indiscriminate selling should the market encounter more than a moderate amount of weakness.
Additionally, the S&P 500
index is often used as a baseline level of
performance against which mutual funds and other asset managers»
performance is measured.
The debate, in a nutshell, goes something like this: Why pay higher fees for an actively managed fund that has a shot at posting much bigger returns than the
index it's measured
against but which also runs the risk of posting smaller returns, when you can buy a low - cost
index fund, such as those that track the
performance of the S&P 500
index, which pretty much guarantees that your returns will be in line with the
index?
To see how tough it has been for value investors, and the impact of the Magic Formula effect, I backtested the
performance of four
indexes against the value decile of each (measured by the enterprise multiple or EBITDA / enterprise value — overview of the research on the enterprise multiple here).
The S&P 500
index is commonly used as a benchmark that investors use to measure the
performance of their individual portfolios
against.
The SPIVA ® Australia Scorecard reports on the
performance of actively managed Australian mutual funds
against their respective benchmark
indices over various investment horizons.