Despite its own underwhelming
performance at the local elections, Labour was buoyed as a new poll by Tory peer Lord Ashcroft showed that Ed Miliband's party was 12 % ahead of the Tories in 26 key marginal battlegrounds.
Not exact matches
The Labour leader attracted unusually high levels of criticism online during his interview for BBC Radio 4's The World
At One programme, in which he refused to speculate on his party's
performance in Thursday's
local elections by declaring he is not interested in «political commentary».
There's no doubt that the Conservatives will rate their
performance in the
local elections as a good one, or
at least not as bad as it might have been.
After repeating the mantra that
local elections are
local, the overall
performances of the main parties
at local elections are often discussed by journalists and others.
We should be cautious though in interpreting the forecast for the Liberal Democrats — for the simple reason that it has never happened before it is impossible to know what the effect of being in government is going to be on the
performance of the Liberal Democrats
at local elections relative to their eventual
performance at the next general
election.
It is not, as some of Corbyn's detractors have claimed, the worst
local election performance for decades (Ed Miliband's Labour did a little worse in 2011 and William Hague did significantly worse for the Tories in 1998) but it is the sort of
local election performance heralding failure
at the next general
election.
However, her slick
performance on the podium
at the Ukip manifesto launch belies a particularly high - profile gaffe in the wake of last year's
local election results when she blamed London's «more media - savvy and educated» population for the party's lack of success in the capital.
The use of
at - large
elections frequently results in one party winning all of the seats on a council, and this situation tends to make the
local elections a popular referendum on the
performance of the party in power
at the national level.