Sentences with phrase «performance in a crash test»
Each vehicle's overall side evaluation is based on performance in a crash test in which the side of the vehicle is struck by a barrier moving at 31 mph.
http://www.iihs.org/
Every year, we determine whether vehicles are changing in any way that could affect their performance in crash tests — for example, if modifications are being made to the structure or to airbags.
The side evaluation is based on performance in a crash test in which the side of a vehicle is struck by a barrier moving at 31 mph.
The IIHS has designated the 2017 Toyota Camry as a Top Safety Pick due to its stellar performance in every crash test available (including small and moderate front overlap, side impact, and roof strength).
Both of these minivans were given a Top Safety Pick + rating for their combination of active and passive safety features along with their performance in crash tests.
The side rating is based on performance in a crash test in which the side of a vehicle is struck by a barrier moving at 31 mph.
Each vehicle's overall side evaluation is based on performance in a crash test in which the side of the vehicle is struck by a barrier moving at 31 mph that represents the front end of a pickup or SUV.
Each vehicle's overall side evaluation is based on performance in a crash test in which the side of the vehicle is struck by a moving barrier representing the front end of a pickup or SUV.
The one drawback to the Ram 1500's aging platform, though, is its performance in crash tests.
The Mazda combined good all - round performance in crash tests with exceptional pedestrian protection thanks to the deployable bonnet fitted as standard.
Side evaluations are based on performance in a crash test in which the side of a vehicle is struck by a barrier moving at 31 mph.
Each vehicle's overall side evaluation is based on performance in a crash test in which the side of the vehicle is struck by a barrier that represents the front end of a pickup truck or SUV.
Each vehicle's overall side evaluation is based on performance in a crash test in which the side of the vehicle is struck by a barrier moving at 31 mph and representing the front end of a pickup or SUV.
Factors like performance in crash tests, standard - equipped safety and security features, and historical rate of theft all play into the rates we pay to insure our vehicles.
Not exact matches
With so many safety features, the Rainier has passed NCAP crash tests, the industry benchmark for seat performance in severe accident conditions.
The Radian RXT is NCAP crash tested, the industry benchmark for collateral kid seat performance in severe accident conditions, and the only seat rated for latch use with a toddler up to eighty pounds.
The RadianRXT is NCAP crash tested, the industry benchmark for verifying child seat performance in severe accident conditions, and the only car seat rated for LATCH use with a child up to 80 lbs.
The new body structure is 25 percent stiffer than the old E46 3 - series, the main goal being to enhance crash performance, particularly in the new federal 50 - mph, rear - end offset crash and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety side - impact test.
The 2017 model year QX60 did quite well in crash tests, with top scores from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety across the board (with the exception of headlight performance, judged to be poor).
While the Rio 5 - Door received five stars for its overall side crash - test performance, in the side barrier test the rear door panel struck the backseat test dummy's torso.
Safety The 2012 Rio 5 - Door received a four - star (out of five) overall rating in National Highway Traffic Safety Administration crash testing, but its performance was marred by a Safety Concern warning in the side barrier crash test.
The 2016 Audi A6 scores the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's coveted Top Safety Pick + award, after revisions for the new model year improved the car's performance in the IIHS small - overlap crash test.
Safety The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety gave the Chevrolet Cruze its top rating of good for its performance in moderate - overlap and side - impact crash tests.
The 2015 Audi A6 already scored «Good» in four of the IIHS's crash - test criteria: moderate overlap crash performance, side - impact performance, roof strength, and headrest and seat performance.
Established in 1997, Euro NCAP is an independent organisation that buys cars anonymously before subjecting them to stringent crash tests and rating their performance.
Performance requirements: Participating manufacturers will ensure vehicles have both a forward collision warning system that meets a subset of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's current 5 - Star Safety Ratings program requirements on the timing of driver alerts and an automatic braking system that earns at least an advanced rating in the current Insurance Institute for Highway Safety front crash prevention track tests.
Competitor Kia Picanto did not achieve the same performance in Euro NCAP's tests, but consumers have the option to purchase the «Advanced Driving Assistance Pack», available on all variants, to enhance its crash avoidance capabilities.
The X1 gets Good ratings in all crash tests and an Advanced score for forward collision prevention, but a Marginal for headlight performance.
The Hyundai Tucson from 2010 - 2014 also happens to be one of the safe cars for teenagers recommended by the IIHS, where it was ranked as a Top Safety Pick for its crash test performance in all of those years save 2014.
For eight years the Institute has been providing comparative rankings of passenger vehicles based on performance in frontal offset crash tests at 40 mph.
Consumer Reports compiled a list of new and used vehicles that provide balanced performance in CR tests, have had average or better reliability, come with standard ESC, and did well in independent crash tests.
Though the April auto issue is printed and on newsstands now, the magazine has also pulled its «recommended» ratings from the Hyundai Elantra, Mazda3, Honda Element, Mitsubishi Outlander, Suzuki Grand Vitara and Nissan Altima, all because of poor performance in Insurance Institute crash tests.
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests, a roof strength test for rollover protection, plus evaluations of seats / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
ARLINGTON, Va. — Five vehicles earn the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's top award based on their performance in the new small overlap front crash test.
ARLINGTON, Va. — The Chevrolet Malibu, a midsize moderately priced car, earns the 2014 IIHS Top Safety Pick + award after structural changes improved its performance in the challenging small overlap front crash test.
In crash tests conducted by ANCAP in 1998 to EuroNCAP regulations RHD Lanos 3dr hatchback showed poor performance, scoring 0.31 out of 16 in offset front crash test and 6.98 of 16 in side impact tesIn crash tests conducted by ANCAP in 1998 to EuroNCAP regulations RHD Lanos 3dr hatchback showed poor performance, scoring 0.31 out of 16 in offset front crash test and 6.98 of 16 in side impact tesin 1998 to EuroNCAP regulations RHD Lanos 3dr hatchback showed poor performance, scoring 0.31 out of 16 in offset front crash test and 6.98 of 16 in side impact tesin offset front crash test and 6.98 of 16 in side impact tesin side impact test.
The Cruze Limited is built on a global platform and its safety performance has been tested and proven with top results in many of the world's crash - test programs.
IIHS assigns models with available front crash prevention systems basic, advanced or superior ratings based on system type and performance in track tests.
It fared excellent in insurance industry crash tests and generally garnered outstanding scores on other safety performance checks in the front, side, and rear impact and rollover categories.
About Euro NCAP Euro NCAP organizes crash tests on new vehicles and provides motoring consumers with a realistic and independent assessment of the safety performance of some of the most popular cars sold in Europe.
«Following a gradual phase - in, the small overlap crash is now part of our basic battery of tests, and good or acceptable performance should be part of every vehicle's safety credentials.
MLIT has been conducting crash safety testing and crash prevention mechanisms in Japan since 1995 to evaluate the safety performance of vehicles.
Official crash test data isn't available for the Audi A7 currently, though the performance of the Audi A6 (which was awarded the full five stars in its most recent NHTSA crash test) should mean the Audi A7 will offer more than enough protection should the worst happen.
Notably, the hot - stamped double - section structure on the B - pillar especially contributes greatly to the excellent performance of the all - new Sonata in crash performance tests.
The Institute's 5 mph crash tests assess bumper performance in the kinds of minor impacts that frequently occur in commuter traffic and parking lots.
No one knows for sure why ABS test performance has not translated into a substantial reduction in real - world crashes.
The same level of performance in those tests, along with at least a basic rating for front crash prevention, is required for the higher accolade, Top Safety Pick +.
Structural improvements to the 2017 Kia Forte have boosted its performance in the small overlap front crash test.
The crash tests compare vehicles by their performance in front crashes into a fixed barrier at 35 mph; more than half of vehicle occupant injuries occur in such accidents.
Similarly, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) dropped its Top Safety Pick rating of the Prius c for 2015 due to its poor performance in the tricky small overlap frontal - crash test.