Not exact matches
Hope you'll pick up a copy
of the book, and that you'll track your
Couch Potato portfolio's
performance here on the site.
Passive investors expect «annual returns
of 6 % to 8 % like clockwork» and therefore the Global
Couch Potato's recent 10 - year
performance was «somewhat lower than advertised.»
The recent
performance of my model portfolios has been excellent: in 2013, the humble Global
Couch Potato returned more than 15 %, and over the last five years, a balanced index portfolio could easily have achieved 10 % annualized returns.
The year - to - date
performance of the Complete
Couch Potato is 1.28 % — hardly cause for dancing in the streets, but given the state
of the global economy and the extreme daily volatility, that's a surprising result.
So if you have a portfolio with 20 % Canadian equities, 20 % U.S. equities, 20 % international equities and 40 % Canadian bonds, compare its
performance to a similarly weighted
Couch Potato portfolio
of cheap ETFs.
Investment
performance figures for the Classic
Couch Potato Portfolio by annual nominal value, annualized rate
of return and annual return.
Over the 40 years closed at the end
of 2015, the basic
Couch Potato would have returned an annualized 9.78 percent — its best
performance.
When Sheldon compared the backtested
performance of the QA portfolio with the regular Global
Couch Potato over the last five years, and the results were remarkable.
You can check this for yourself by using our monthly update
of performance and standard deviation for both portfolios
Couch Potato and AssetBuilder.
While the percentile rankings for trailing
performance vary from month to month,
Couch Potato investors are almost always in the top 50 percent and are frequently in the top 25 percent
of portfolio categories called «Moderate Allocation» or «World Allocation» by Morningstar.
Before diving into the bond market, I'd like to start by examining the
performance of an aggressive form
of the global
couch potato portfolio.