Not exact matches
And policies tethering
teacher evaluations to
student test scores are
based on studies that link high -
performing teachers to long - term improvements in the lives of
students, particularly the most disadvantaged.
Jason Kamras, deputy to D.C. Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee in charge of human capital, talks with Education Next about the new
teacher evaluation system put in place in D.C. Beginning this year,
teachers in D.C. will be evaluated
based on student test scores (when available) and classroom observations (by principals and master educators), and poorly
performing teachers may be fired, regardless of tenure.
The first study calculates two estimates: one
based on the
test scores of the
teachers» high -
performing students and the other
based on the
scores of their low -
performing students.
In some states, those
teachers are assigned a
score anyway, either
based on how their
students performed on tests in other subjects or
based on the performance of all
students in a school.
During the strike, Chicago
Teachers Union president Karen Lewis said she was concerned that «too much of the new evaluations will be
based on students» standardized
test scores,» and argued there were «too many factors beyond our control which impact how well some
students perform on standardized
tests, such as poverty, exposure to violence, homelessness, hunger, and other social issues beyond our control» (Chicago
Teachers Union, 2012, para. 5).
Half of a
teacher's rating will be calculated
based on how he or she
scores in the observation, and half will be determined by how
students perform on standardized
tests.
The state promised to turn around its poorest
performing schools over the course of four years, evaluate
teachers based in part
on student test scores, increase the use of technology in the classroom, and use more rigorous academic standards along with new
tests aligned to those standards.