Not exact matches
•
Perhaps you noticed the NYU Child
Study Center's
questions target only certain children, kids somewhere in the A and B range with potential for getting into a good school.
Perhaps just not the same fields of
study» Second — if one can't see these
questions as an exercise in thought and rationale then that person has failed the test... placing opinion in the mix as to thwart the morons is just another test to see truly how moronic people can be!
Krister Stendahl gave voice to this in his important essay The Bible and the Role of Women: A Case
Study in Hermeneutics written in 1958.6 Donald Dayton expressed a similar position in his article in the Post American: «the real
question - at least for most Christians [is]: Which of these views (the hierarchical or the egalitarian — or
perhaps a synthesis of the two) has the clearer grounding in scripture?
In light of such claims, it is
perhaps not surprising to encounter these
study questions on the scrolls: «Describe the impact of this discovery on those who do not accept the authenticity of the Bible» and «Determine the evidence from the Dead Sea scrolls confirming the claims of Jesus as the Bible describes him.»
They usually take place outside the Divinity School, and they are intended, not for specialists in religious
studies of any kind, but for a general audience of people, mainly, but by no means exclusively, undergraduate, whose courses of
study may lie in other fields, but who are interested in listening to a non-technical presentation of
questions with which theologians are concerned and
perhaps also in taking part in discussions which are arranged to follow the lectures.
My point was that
studying the history of how one's belief system got to them can lead to that sort of revelation or
perhaps a different acceptance of it based on the
question of why did some core beliefs (that transcend many different religions) make it through.
A sense of being embattled: a reliance
perhaps on rules rather than answers to profound
questions raised in a rapidly - changing world, a sense of the Church as a fortress rather than a Mother and teacher, a bleak landscape for Biblical
studies.
In addition to simply helping linguists understand how people spoke in the past,
studying ancient languages can
perhaps answer historical
questions.
Now, in a provocative
study that raises unsettling
questions about the widespread use of vitamin supplements, Swedish researchers have showed that relatively low doses of antioxidants spur the growth of early lung tumors in cancer - prone mice,
perhaps by hindering a well - known tumor suppressor gene.
But after having
studied the answers to
question 2, you have
perhaps become more realistic in your goals and wiser about how to meet them.
By
studying the gas, dust and structure of the nucleus and organic materials associated with the comet, via both remote and in - situ observations, the Rosetta mission should be a key to unlocking the history and evolution of our solar system, as well as answering
questions regarding the origin of Earth's water and
perhaps even life.
Perhaps most chillingly, the
study reveals how inadequate our present observing systems still are when it comes to certain fundamental climate
questions — such as whether the world is getting more or less cloudy, Stevens adds.
By
studying the gas, dust and structure of the nucleus and organic materials associated with the comet, the Rosetta mission should become key to unlocking the history and evolution of our solar system, as well as answering
questions regarding the origin of Earth's water and
perhaps even life.
Thus, it is
perhaps surprising that very few fMRI
studies have addressed the
question of how the brain is functionally organized in childhood ASD, at developmental stages more proximal to the onset of the disorder (Akshoomoff et al., 2002; Amaral, 2010).
With this approach — capturing the experiences of individual children in even hard - to - reach settings — the
study will seek to answer the big
questions facing the field,
perhaps the most enduring of which is just how tangible and long lasting the benefits of preschool are.
But before we all go out and buy T - shirts with some romantic imperative like «Save the Ovaries»,
perhaps we should step back and consider the following
question: Why haven't previous dog
studies called our attention to this potential downside of ovariectomy?
But then the writers make a few more terrible jokes, including one scene where Bryce checks out Arcadia's lingerie in her apartment, that start to drag poor Bryce back into the realms of being unlikable, and that leaves me at a bit of an impasse: I could argue that Bryce is
perhaps an interesting
study on human nature,
questioning what someone would actually become after 500 - years of watching friends and family die around them without being able to die themselves, always having to live on the outer fringes of society.
He also surveyed the resources
question in an analysis largely bereft of economics, but his most remarkable and statement was
perhaps his suggestion that
studies of overcrowding among rats could tell us something about the human behaviour we might expect:
Many of the people whose pockets might be hurt by expenses for combating warming are quite happy to see the issues dumped solely into the laps of the scientists,
perhaps because they know that scientific
studies always raise more
questions than they answer, and so the issue of whether science has spoken on the issue can be indefinitely postponed.
WE, your example of the medicine
study is not only data snooping, it will get your application to the FDA handed back to you forthwith, and
perhaps a g - man visit with a list of
questions he wants to ask you.
But this
study raises
perhaps equally important
questions: first, how do nanoparticles affect the absorption of toxins?
As a consequence, the resulting
study is much more descriptive in nature than one would
perhaps first have expected in light of the underlying research
questions.
This is
perhaps one of the drawbacks of the clear focus on the research
question pursued throughout the book: While the resulting
study is very coherent and interesting to read, the focus lies very strongly on jurisdictional and court - related issues.
One
question the writers of «legal eduction»
studies might ask —
perhaps they have, I've never bothered to look — is «what does it tell us about law as a discipline that so many people who claim they're no good at math, sciences, philosophy, logic etc. (and whose transcripts show it), manage to get into law school and then do reasonably well»?
Perhaps the most revealing statistic from our «Bitcoin and Ethereum Sentiment
Study» stemmed from the simplest
question one could ask.