Sentences with phrase «perhaps warmer way»

I have always been someone sensitive to light and aesthetics so I realized that a sign, especially a hand - draw one, perhaps colored with natural pigments, can touch the learner's eyes or let's poetically say, their heart, in a different, perhaps warmer way than its digital counterpart.

Not exact matches

Furthermore, when ministers get discouraged and seem to be accomplishing nothing, again and again their hearts are warmed by the fidelity of those laymen — perhaps only one or two in a congregation — who can always be depended on, who see at least partially what the minister is driving at, who in an unpretentious way are genuine Christian saints.

Perhaps he was nostalgic for the warm ocean breeze or maybe he just wanted an excuse to have rum in his dessert, but either way, it was the perfect way to end a Christmas meal!

Yes David Bentley has improved greatly of late, and perhaps we could just offload Jamie O'Hara and Alan Hutton, but that being said when everyone is fit and well Bentley won't get a game and therefore it would in some ways be unfair to keep him just to warm the bench as that would not serve his career too well at this stage.

Or perhaps you have to stop using your blanket for health reasons; are there other ways you can stay warm on cold nights?

In a warming climate, perhaps the greatest appeal of a career in the oil and gas industry is the chance to transform the way we generate and use energy.

Albedo modification «is not a solution to global warming, it is only a way to avoid, perhaps, a tipping point in the climate.»

«In a perhaps typically Cuban understated way its warm embrace lingers until you realize you want more,» reads the catalog copy for this herb.

«Perhaps as the surface warms the atmosphere has a capacity to release warmth to space in a way the climate models don't take into account.»

Cassini discovered a liquid - water ocean under the icy surface of the moon Enceladus and, perhaps a victim of its own success, must die to prevent any chance that its warm electric generators might melt their way down into those life - friendly waters.

Perhaps there isn't a warm or friendly way for a woman to get ready to take her husband to prison.

It is officially summertime in the UK and what better way to add a bit of spice to those warm summer days than perhaps a sip of Chairman's Reserve over ice with Ginger Beer?

All I'm saying is that it's a reasonable way of looking at the facts, and trying too strenously to refute it is perhaps not the best way to convert reasonable newbies to the subject to consensus views on global warming.

There is a gaping gap, in my view, between several things, perhaps best stated this way: If the large majority of scientists are correct on global warming, and if the Times genuinely means what it says in its occasional editorials on the subject, then the coverage of the issue in the news pages is clearly way below the task, and way off - mark.

And if these policies were actually discussed publicly in that way (as being beneficial for many reasons other than mitigating global warming) perhaps we'd get out of the trap that Michael Crichton and his ilk continue to set for us.

Perhaps more importantly, the paper in no way challenges the Emanuel (2005) study demonstrating a close linkage between warming sea surface temperatures and hurricane intensity for the Atlantic.

It is also possible for cold climates to increase chemical weathering in some ways, by lowering sea level to expose more land to erosion (though I'd guess this can also increase oxydation of C in sediments) and by supplying more sediments via glacial erosion for chemical weathering (of course, those sediments must make it to warmer conditions to make the process effective — downhill and downstream, or perhaps via pulsed ice ages -LRB-?)-RRB-.

Is it not also given that there is continuous change on Earth, in a lot more ways than temperature, eventually leading to the death of this planet, it's a chaotic work in progress... perhaps it is ridiculous and short sighted to even hope to meaningfully alter any part of the process in the long - run... it may be possible that so many other unforeseen changes in natural life conditions besides getting warmer (or colder) are in store for us that, in hind sight we will look back and chuckle at our feeble efforts to control something so beyond man's control.

One of the ways to limit greenhouse gas emissions and perhaps to slow global warming would be to develop nuclear energy.

After all, if sceptics hadn't made such an issue of the lack of warming, perhaps England would not have been moved to find a way to wrong - foot them.

Dr. Hansen stressed that he is still convinced that global warming is under way, that people are a significant cause, and that work should be done to cut the rate of change — perhaps not quite as much work as researchers thought.

We certainly should have a sufficient appreciation by now for the holistic processes involved in global warming to know that GCMs can not effectively model climate change except perhaps in the most abstract way possible — such as by way of using the mathematics of chaos.

I cherry - picked the dates and the dataset just to make the point, which in fact is a «warming one» hence my admission of surprise, and shock [I've not heard of this way of looking at the data before — perhaps I haven't been listening very well]

Glaciations taking 90,000 years are obviously way slower than this, but perhaps there are examples of faster recoveries from warming.

Re: CB (# 172), Re: Ryan O (# 174), Re: CB (# 176), Perhaps me not being a native speaker prevents me from understanding stylistic subtleties, but in my view CB in your last response you might be reacting to a non-existent antagonism — Ryan O.'s post did not contain anything attacking you or any other dendrochronologists or even the climate change per se (by the way, as you will probably agree, global climate change is not equivalent to global warming).

But the upside is three-fold: (i) your tax reduction or dividend check will offset much, perhaps more than 100 %, of those price increases; (ii) you'll be able to minimize your tax bite by cutting down on fuel usage (e.g., shortening those country drives, buying locally - grown produce, purchasing «green power» from wind and solar cells); and (iii) Americans» combined behavior changes in response to the carbon tax will go a long way toward protecting the climate and averting the cataclysmic consequences of unchecked global warming.

In terms of keeping you warm though, even in hOMe which is on the larger spectrum of tiny houses, we stay toasty warm even when it's -10 F. Granted we don't go all the way down to your temps but perhaps you can try it without first and see how it goes?

But the way she has phrased it is misleading (perhaps deliberately) and makes it sound like it has not warmed.

Perhaps we're saying the same thing in opposite ways, but it seems to me that knowing that 95 % of a catastrophe is not attributable to global warming is valuable because it focuses attention on the other, more important, root causes and ways to deal with them.

I think your criticisms about assumptions are fair, but perhaps a better way of looking at this post is not so much «CO2 caused x amount of warming,» but rather «CO2 COULD N'T HAVE CAUSED MORE THAN x amount of warming,» thereby invalidating the claims of catastrophe.

As for the rest, well, the dystopian evidence seems overwhelming indeed, to the point where it might be no stretch at all to say the biggest threat facing America is perhaps not global warming, not perpetual warmongering, not garbage food or low - level radiation or way too much Lindsay Lohan, but a populace far too ignorant to know how to properly manage any of it, much less change it all for the better.