Which leaves the state with a four - year «cooling off»
period against climate change's sea - level effects.
Not exact matches
The
climate is pretty even with average temperatures varying between the high sixties and low eighties — however, make no mistake, when the sun comes out it is HOT and humidty can reach 75 % especially between July - December
period which means you need to be well protected
against mosquitos.
Stephen Dorling, of the University of East Anglia's school of environmental sciences, said it was not surprising the cold
period raised questions over
climate change — but the snowy weather should not be used as evidence
against it.
But if you look at 65 - year
climate since 1868 plotted
against rising CO2 forcing, making the appropriate allowance for variations in heat from the Sun during that
period, you get a perfectly straight line heading upwards at a rate of 1.73 °C per doubling of CO2, as can be seen from this graph.
«But if you look at 65 - year
climate since 1868 plotted
against rising CO2 forcing, making the appropriate allowance for variations in heat from the Sun during that
period»
As I said, when comparing with observations over the short
period being considered here, it makes more sense to compare with models that include natural internal variability (i.e.: GCMs — as in the final version) than
against models that do not include this and only include externally - forced changes (ie: Simple
Climate Models, SCMs, — as in the SOD version).
Professor Huang and his colleagues took two
climate simulations and projected them backwards in time, and forwards − the first to check the simulation
against recorded data from the
period 1961 - 1990, and then to fine - tune the future projections.
So using the criteria of «noticeable»
climate change that would affect humanity and nature, that can be reasonably validated
against the benchmark of the 1920 - 40
period by such records as instrumental and crop, or observations, and as being of a duration of at least one decade, we have some 15 decadal episodes of «noticeable»
climate change, (up and down) between1538 and 2012.
We can repeat our earlier observation that CET instrumental to 1659 - this time augmented by the reconstruction using historical records to 1538, demonstrates a temperature profile that looks quite different to significant
periods of the remainder of the Northern Hemisphere if the official version of extended
climate - as epitomised by the «Hockey stick» - is taken as the appropriate set of data which it should be measured
against.
In addition to the problems that you list in testing the
climate models
against climate data of the instrumental
period they affect certainly also most paleoclimatic studies.
He clarified to Campus Reform that many scientists do not argue
against slight warming of the Earth after the Little Ice Age (the unusually cool
period of the Earth around the 1700s A.D.), nor do those critical of anthropogenic
climate change argue that humans have made no impact on the planet, merely that the effect has been small and largely beneficial.