Which leaves the state with a four - year «cooling off»
period against climate change's sea - level effects.
Not exact matches
Stephen Dorling, of the University of East Anglia's school of environmental sciences, said it was not surprising the cold
period raised questions over
climate change — but the snowy weather should not be used as evidence
against it.
As I said, when comparing with observations over the short
period being considered here, it makes more sense to compare with models that include natural internal variability (i.e.: GCMs — as in the final version) than
against models that do not include this and only include externally - forced
changes (ie: Simple
Climate Models, SCMs, — as in the SOD version).
So using the criteria of «noticeable»
climate change that would affect humanity and nature, that can be reasonably validated
against the benchmark of the 1920 - 40
period by such records as instrumental and crop, or observations, and as being of a duration of at least one decade, we have some 15 decadal episodes of «noticeable»
climate change, (up and down) between1538 and 2012.
He clarified to Campus Reform that many scientists do not argue
against slight warming of the Earth after the Little Ice Age (the unusually cool
period of the Earth around the 1700s A.D.), nor do those critical of anthropogenic
climate change argue that humans have made no impact on the planet, merely that the effect has been small and largely beneficial.