Sentences with phrase «perjury if»

It is subject to the same penalties of perjury if one lies as if you swear on a bible and testify in court or on a «sworn» affidavit.
The truth is that you commit perjury if you lie at any time while you have been sworn to tell the truth in a legal proceeding.
It is a common misconception that you can only commit perjury if you are testifying in court.
Further, witnesses can be criminally charged with perjury if they make false statements in their testimony.
I can also spend some time cross examining that witness on his or her understanding of what verification requires and on the concept of perjury (by answering interrogatories «under oath» the witness becomes subject to perjury if the answers are both material and knowingly false).
Being forcibly questioned on oath and without warning or legal advisors, with no hint of what the questions related to or whether it was a matter involving them or someone else (maybe a family member or friend), the subject either had to incriminate themself or someone else by telling the truth, be charged with perjury if they lied or other witnesses said differently when questioned in turn, or be charged with contempt of court if they didn't speak.

Not exact matches

If Trump is deposed and lies under oath, he could be impeached for perjury just as Clinton was.
When you state something is a FACT without providing proof or evidence it is considered to be deception and if sworn to, perjury.
If you believe that your work has been copied and posted on the Website in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please send the following information to our Copyright Agent (see 17 U.S.C. § 512 (c)(3) for further detail): (i) a description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed; (ii) a description of where the allegedly infringed material is located on the Website; (iii) a written statement that you have a good - faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (iv) your address, telephone number, and email address so that Non-GMO Project is able to contact you; (v) an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; and (vi) a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the information in your report is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf.
If you believe that your work has been copied in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please provide MomsTeam's Agent for Notice of claims of copyright or other intellectual property infringement («Agent») the written information specified below: (1) An electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; (2) A description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed upon, or if multiple copyright works at a single online site are covered by a single notification, a representative list of such works at that site; (3) A description of where the material that you claim is infringing is located on the Web site; (4) Your address, telephone number, and e-mail address; (5) A statement by you that you have a good - faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (6) A statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalIf you believe that your work has been copied in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please provide MomsTeam's Agent for Notice of claims of copyright or other intellectual property infringement («Agent») the written information specified below: (1) An electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; (2) A description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed upon, or if multiple copyright works at a single online site are covered by a single notification, a representative list of such works at that site; (3) A description of where the material that you claim is infringing is located on the Web site; (4) Your address, telephone number, and e-mail address; (5) A statement by you that you have a good - faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (6) A statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalif multiple copyright works at a single online site are covered by a single notification, a representative list of such works at that site; (3) A description of where the material that you claim is infringing is located on the Web site; (4) Your address, telephone number, and e-mail address; (5) A statement by you that you have a good - faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (6) A statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf.
In this case, it's been proven that Donald Trump's campaign has committed perjury, and the only hurdle to turn that into a «crime» for Article II would be to see if Trump himself had anything to do with it.
Those brought before the court were compelled to swear an oath, and if their answers were unsatisfactory (i.e. not matching the King's expectation) they would be convicted of perjury.
But his 2009 perjury case will eventually be dismissed if he continues fully cooperating, as will several other uncharged crimes, removing any obstacles to his running.
If the Bronx Democrats REALLY wanted Nelson Castro out of office, they would have instructed (or suggested) to Bronx District Attorney to continue with the perjury case that remains in criminal court.
«If this council is interested in really improving police - community relations, let them introduce a bill requiring the complaints to be sworn under penalty of perjury that will help to separate real complaints from flat - our harassment of arresting officers,» PBA President Patrick Lynch said.
«Michel Aubier, an asthma specialist at the Hôpital Bichat - Claude Bernard in Paris, could face prison time and a hefty fine if his alleged perjury goes to court,» Rabesandratana wrote.
Without limiting the foregoing, if you believe that your work has been copied and posted on the Service in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please provide our Copyright Agent with the following information: an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; a description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed; a description of where the material that you claim is infringing is located on the Web site; your address, telephone number, and email address; a written statement by you that you have a good faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf.
Without limiting the foregoing, if you believe that your work has been copied and posted on the Service in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please provide our Copyright Agent with the following information: an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; a description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed; a description of where the material that you claim is infringing is located on the Website; your address, telephone number, and email address; a written statement by you that you have a good faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf.
Under penalty of perjury, each person who is employed or under contract in a capacity described in subsection (1) must agree to inform his or her employer or the party with whom he or she is under contract within 48 hours if convicted of any disqualifying offense while he or she is employed or under contract in that capacity.
The request must include the requester's name, mailing address, telephone number and / or e-mail address, a description and, if possible, the location of the records requested, and verification of the requester's identity (such as, a statement under penalty of perjury that the requester is the individual who he or she claims to be).
Gore, if found guilty of encouraging the endangered owl to lie under oath, could face congressional censure on charges of perjury, obstruction of justice and owl - fucking.
And I don't want to submit form 8802 if it is absolutely impossible to be successful (the fee is $ 85 which I can not easily afford at the moment, plus I need to provide a statement under penalty of Perjury, a strong word to play with).
If you decide to file, you will be signing your bankruptcy schedules under penalty of perjury.
If it is found that either one of you has done this, then a motion can be brought before the court and the matter is dealt with by a judge — often settling in favour of the person who didn't commit perjury.
If you do not have valid Proof of Purchase you must (i) confirm under penalty of perjury that you purchased one or more Blue Buffalo Products during the Settlement Class Period, and (ii) state the total amount of money that you spent on Blue Buffalo Products during the Settlement Class Period.
(a) an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on your behalf; (b) a description of the material that has been removed or to which access has been disabled and where the material was located online before it was removed or access to it was disabled; (c) a written statement by you that under penalty of perjury, that you have a good faith belief that the material was removed or disabled as a result of mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled; and (d) your address, telephone number, and email address; and (e) a statement that you consent to the jurisdiction of federal district court for the judicial district in which the address is located, or if your address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which the service provider may be found, and that you will accept service of process from the person who provided notification under DMCA 512 subsection (c)(1)(c) or an agent of such person.
If a person lies in such a context, they are subject to various sanctions including obstruction of justice and perjury.
If it's himself and he lies and then is caught lying he commits perjury and THEN a criminal trial will be forthcoming.
And don't forget, if you lie, a Senate hearing on perjury is just a phone call away.
Sections 13 of the Charter and 5 (2) of the CEA are treated as offering the same protection and both provide that prior compelled evidence is inadmissible against an accused, including to challenge credibility, unless the prosecution is for perjury or if the accused is giving contradictory evidence.
If someone makes a statement under oath and knows it is false, that person commits perjury.
If your client has really made a patent application in his name, that is at best worthless and at worst a criminal offence akin to perjury.
that evidence... if it tends to incriminate him or her... shall not be used or received against the police officer... in any civil proceeding or in any proceeding under any other Act, except in a prosecution for or proceedings in respect of perjury or the giving of contradictory evidence.
Being mistaken, even if the error is due to egregious ignorance of or disregard for case law, does not support a perjury conviction.
Is Goodling taking the Fifth because if she testifies under oath she would lie and face perjury charges rather than tell the truth?
As it stands, the law regarding this exception is that one party may be allowed to give evidence of privileged discussions if the exclusion of such evidence would act as a cloak for perjury, blackmail or other unambiguous impropriety.
If the statement were «I have written authorization from Z, the author of work X, to act on his behalf», that is likely to result in a perjury conviction.
Monroe Freedman's wonderful piece from 1966, on the 3 Hardest Questions for criminal defence lawyers, tried to show how hard the issues are — re perjury, cross-examination and misleading the court — and for 50 years after all that happened was that people reduced his work to «Monroe Freedman thinks lawyers should suborn perjury», which was not his point * at all * (even if he thought sometimes they should).
This also raises the risk that prosecutors may charge the individual with perjury or obstruction of justice if they perceive that the individual's testimony has materially and improperly changed.
Considering this, I question the purpose of specifying «except in a prosecution for perjury or for giving of contradictory evidence» in section 51 if Staranchuk affirmed that similar words were meaningless in section 13 of the Charter in cases involving deceit (Staranchuk at para 5).
In these cases, even if the protection against self - incrimination in section 13 of the Charter applies — which provides that «A witness who testifies in any proceedings has the right not to have any incriminating evidence so given used to incriminate that witness in any other proceedings, except in a prosecution for perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence» — the SKCA held that prior false statements are admissible where the deceit is the substance of the offence, regardless of whether it was «incriminating evidence» or related to «perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence» (Staranchuk SKCA at para 5).
In this case, if it were even close to perjury, you would have to testify against yourself.
«stating something which you do not believe to be true, while under oath» So technically, if you say something you believe to be false but is actually true, you commit perjury?
The DMCA handles this by opening the submitter to perjury charges if the takedown was submitted illegally.
Obviously, prosecution for perjury is possible if they testify to something they know is false.
If after learning about jury nullification you think it's a good idea: answer «yes» and you'll be rejected, but answer «no» with the intent to get on the jury to nullify and you've just committed perjury — technically a federal crime — which makes the optimal strategy once on a jury to zip it.
You'll be in a situation where you're trussed into a process — there used to be a sense that if you went on the witness stand and you took an oath then you would tell the truth because the sanctions for not telling the truth were very great, people were worries about perjury and contempt of court — and in fact the family courts can make a reference to the criminal courts for prosecution for perjury but they just don't do it.
Another interesting survey would ask this question of the general public: «If someone is convicted of perjury, what is the underlaying offense?»
Even if your perjury offense was minor, the fact that you have a criminal record will be a liability later in life.
(iv) If the exclusion of the evidence would act as a cloak for perjury, blackmail or other «unambiguous impropriety».
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z