Sentences with phrase «permanent order of the court»

Not exact matches

The court also heard that the child, who was taken from her mother after police became concerned for her welfare, could still be taken to her grandmother's country of origin if a permanent order was made to grant her care of the girl.

The appellate court granted the Writ of Kalikasan and ordered for the permanent stopping of Bt - talong field trials in the country.

The court ordered the permanent cease of Bt talong field trials and the protection, rehabilitation and restoration of the environment.

More hearings are set for the District Court and Third Circuit Court of Appeals, where the sports leagues are trying to turn the temporary restraining order into a permanent restraining order.

On May 10, this court by supervisory order directed trial court to fix the permanent custody of the children.

Dissatisfied with trial court's deferring a final determination as to custody, Robert applied to this court for either permission to bring an interlocutory appeal from the supplemental decree of March 15 or the issuance from this court of a supervisory order directing entry of a decree settling permanent custody.

There were 2.6 million kids in permanent formal kinship care as of 2009, not counting a large number in informal (e.g. not court ordered) kinship care.

The Federal High Court Sitting in Lagos has granted an order of interim forfeiture of the sum of N437, 348,181 allegedly linked to a current Permanent Secretary of the Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment, Mr. Clement Illoh Onubuogu.

A Federal High Court in Lagos has ordered permanent forfeiture of N 7, 644, 700, 000.00 belonging to former Minister of Petroleum Resources, Diezani Alison - Madueke, to the Federal Government.

«Let them challenge the verdict of a competent court of our land which recently ordered the permanent forfeiture of property and billions of naira in cash belonging to Diezani Alison - Madueke (former minister of petroleum resources).

Superior Court Judge Robert Hobgood ordered a permanent injunction against the implementation of the law that ends career status, known as teacher tenure.

The Nevada Supreme Court, therefore, affirmed in part and reversed in part the lower court's order in Duncan v. State of Nevada, dismissing the suit and remanding the case to the state district court to enter a declaratory judgment and permanent injunction prohibiting enforcement of section 16 of SB 302 in the absence of an appropriation consistent with the supreme court's opiCourt, therefore, affirmed in part and reversed in part the lower court's order in Duncan v. State of Nevada, dismissing the suit and remanding the case to the state district court to enter a declaratory judgment and permanent injunction prohibiting enforcement of section 16 of SB 302 in the absence of an appropriation consistent with the supreme court's opicourt's order in Duncan v. State of Nevada, dismissing the suit and remanding the case to the state district court to enter a declaratory judgment and permanent injunction prohibiting enforcement of section 16 of SB 302 in the absence of an appropriation consistent with the supreme court's opicourt to enter a declaratory judgment and permanent injunction prohibiting enforcement of section 16 of SB 302 in the absence of an appropriation consistent with the supreme court's opicourt's opinion.

Ruling / Rationale: The Nevada Supreme Court, therefore, affirmed in part and reversed in part the lower court's order in Duncan v. State of Nevada, dismissing the suit and remanding the case to the state district court to enter a declaratory judgment and permanent injunction prohibiting enforcement of section 16 of SB 302 in the absence of an appropriation consistent with the supreme court's opiCourt, therefore, affirmed in part and reversed in part the lower court's order in Duncan v. State of Nevada, dismissing the suit and remanding the case to the state district court to enter a declaratory judgment and permanent injunction prohibiting enforcement of section 16 of SB 302 in the absence of an appropriation consistent with the supreme court's opicourt's order in Duncan v. State of Nevada, dismissing the suit and remanding the case to the state district court to enter a declaratory judgment and permanent injunction prohibiting enforcement of section 16 of SB 302 in the absence of an appropriation consistent with the supreme court's opicourt to enter a declaratory judgment and permanent injunction prohibiting enforcement of section 16 of SB 302 in the absence of an appropriation consistent with the supreme court's opicourt's opinion.

(a) Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that any person or group of persons is engaged in a pattern or practice of resistance to the full enjoyment of any of the rights secured by this title, and that the pattern or practice is of such a nature and is intended to deny the full exercise of the rights herein described, the Attorney General may bring a civil action in the appropriate district court of the United States by filing with it a complaint (1) signed by him (or in his absence the Acting Attorney General), (2) setting forth facts pertaining to such pattern or practice, and (3) requesting such preventive relief, including an application for a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order or other order against the person or persons responsible for such pattern or practice, as he deems necessary to insure the full enjoyment of the rights herein described.

(a) Whenever any person has engaged or there are reasonable grounds to believe that any person is about to engage in any act or practice prohibited by section 203, a civil action for preventive relief, including an application for a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order, or other order, may be instituted by the person aggrieved and, upon timely application, the court may, in its discretion, permit the Attorney General to intervene in such civil action if he certifies that the case is of general public importance.

(a) Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that any person or group of persons is engaged in a pattern or practice of resistance to the full enjoyment of any of the rights secured by this title, and that the pattern or practice is of such a nature and is intended to deny the full exercise of the rights herein described, the Attorney General may bring a civil action in the appropriate district court of the United States by filing with it a complaint (1) signed by him (or in his absence the Acting Attorney General), (2) setting forth facts pertaining to such pattern or practice, and (3) requesting such relief, including an application for a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order or other order against the person or persons responsible for such pattern or practice, as he deems necessary to insure the full enjoyment of the rights herein described.

The additional 10 % tax generally does not apply to payments that are: • Paid after you separate from service during or after the year you reach age 55; • Annuity payments; • Automatic enrollment refunds; • Made as a result of total and permanent disability; * • Made because of death; • Made from a beneficiary participant account; • Made in a year you have deductible medical expenses that exceed 7.5 % of your adjusted gross income; * • Ordered by a domestic relations court; or • Paid as substantially equal payments over your life expectancy.For more info see: https://www.tsp.gov/PDF/formspubs/tsp-780.pdf Enjoy your retirement!

Each complaint asks the court to enter a permanent injunction barring the defendants from engaging in debt settlement in Illinois and order the defendants to pay restitution for aggrieved consumers, civil penalties of $ 50,000 for violating the Consumer Fraud Act, an additional $ 50,000 penalty for each violation committed with the intent to defraud, as well as a $ 10,000 penalty per violation committed against a person 65 years or older.

For Meryl, Best Friends was always going to be her permanent home, because a court order requires her to spend the rest of her life at the Sanctuary.

Iowa now allows the court to grant petitioners exclusive care, possession, or control of any pets or companion animals in both temporary and permanent orders.

BACKGROUND: On January 9, 2009, the Respondent Attorney General of British Columbia filed a statement of claim seeking an interlocutory and permanent injunction, as well as a vexatious litigant order under s. 18 of the Supreme Court Act, in relation to the Appellant, Michael Andrews.

One of the characteristics which distinguishes the supranational constitutional order of the European Union from Public International Law is the crystallised jurisdiction of the European Union's permanent court.

(2) «Sole custody» means a person, including, but not limited to, a parent who has temporary or permanent custody of a child and, unless otherwise provided for by court order, the rights and responsibilities for major decisions concerning the child, including the child's education, medical and dental care, extracurricular activities, and religious training.

While here are 14 statutory factors the courts is required to consider when making a permanent spousal support order, the decision to order spousal support, the amount, and the duration of support, rests within the court's discretion.

The court went on to explain that section 7.5.2 of the Guidelines leaves open the possibility that support may be terminated, as it provides that an order for «indefinite» support does not necessarily mean «permanent» support.

On the other hand, the court orders permanent spousal support based on the circumstances of each party.

Partition of Properties, Cancellation of Documents, Specific Performance of Contracts, Restoration of Possession of Properties, Permanent Injunctions, Suits for Dissolution of Partnerships, Rendition of Accounts, Recovery of Money and Mesne Profits, Declaration of Rights with Consequential Relief, Benami Transactions, Recovery of Damages, Succession Certificates, Stay Orders, Constitutional Writ Petitions before the High Courts, Recovery of Bad Debts and Loans:

At trial, the family court found that Husband still had a $ 100,000 annual earning capacity, denied his request for a permanent reduction in alimony, and ordered him to pay $ 26,004 in back alimony for the period of time his alimony was temporarily reduced.

Obtained temporary restraining order and stipulated permanent injunction for client in matter involving enforcement of non-compete agreement in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

courts should resolve the controversies before them and make an order which is permanent subject only to change under s. 17 on proof of a change of circumstances.»

On numerous occasions, our lawyers have pursued emergency relief in federal and state courts to protect against the loss or infringement of IP rights and trade secrets, including obtaining and defending against temporary restraining orders and preliminary and permanent injunctions.

I acknowledge and agree that violation of this Employee Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement by me may cause the Company irreparable harm, and therefore I agree that the Company will be entitled to seek extraordinary relief in court, including, but not limited to, temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions and permanent injunctions without the necessity of posting a bond or other security (or, where such a bond or security is required, I agree that a $ [NUMBER] bond will be adequate), in addition to and without prejudice to any other rights or remedies that the Company may have for a breach of this Employee Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement.

The Court may order that a witness or expert be heard by the judicial authority of his place of permanent residence.

If they desire to make a more significant permanent change, the parents need to return to court and seek an alteration of the exiting visitation order.

Instead, the same old four part test for injunctive relief that we all learned back in law school applies where the district court weighs factors as likelihood of success and irreparable nature of harm in determining whether to order a permanent injunction or whether monetary damages will suffice.

Family Court Juvenile and Adult Processes How to Become a Guardian How to Become a Permanent Guardian How to Get Expedited Family Court Relief Legal Care of a Child Chart Order of Protection from Abuse FAQ

On December 4, 2017, the Court ordered directed the defendants — PlexCorps, Dominic Lacroix, and Sabrina Paradis - Royer, to show cause why an order should not be entered for their permanent enjoinment from violating the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and from participating in any offerings of unregistered securities or otherwise violating Sections 5 (a) and 5 (c) of the Securities Act.

Unsurprisingly the courts and local authority social work teams are extremely stretched, the system is very expensive (care order applications cost the public purse well over # 25,000 a case on top of the child's care costs) and significant delays in finding a permanent placement for the child is a common occurrence.

The court may order either spouse to make maintenance payments, either rehabilitative or permanent in nature, to the other spouse if it finds that the spouse seeking maintenance needs the income and lacks property or both, or is unable to support himself or herself through appropriate employment at the standard of living established during the marriage, or is the custodian of a child of the parties.

Judicial responses to alienation include: ordering an assessment; ordering supervised access on a permanent basis; intervention in the early stages of the dispute, before the problem has had time to become «true» alienation, or in the early years of a child's development; changing custody on a temporary basis; determining whether «pure» or «mixed» alienation is taking place; keeping the courts involved; suggesting counselling; making a finding of contempt; making a no - contact order; involving the Children's Aid Society; not making a parallel parenting order; meeting with the children; and in extreme cases, putting the alienating parent's actions on court record, in hopes that if the child revisits the issue as an adult, they may be able to see what actually took place.

These are orders that remain in effect during the course of your divorce proceedings, until permanent orders are issued by the court with the final divorce decree.

Generally, the new law requires, in order for the parties to receive a divorce, court approval of a permanent parenting plan which complies with certain strict statutory requirements.

Changing a permanent custody order involves going back to court for modification, and the parent seeking the modification would have to prove a change of circumstance that makes it inappropriate for the children to continue living in the custodial parent's home.

To that end, the law allows a mother to request temporary and permanent court orders of protection to protect both the mother and children from abuse, and a judge is required to consider domestic violence as a factor against awarding custody to an abusive husband.

If a parent violates the terms of either a temporary or permanent order, the other parent can file a petition with the court for enforcement.

For modifications of permanent [post judgment] spousal support orders, the Court also uses the factors in Family Law Code 4320.

Permanent Alimony - spousal support ordered to be paid at a specified, periodic rate until modified by a court order, the death of either party, or the remarriage of the Obligee, whichever occurs first.

Either parent can seek court ordered custody in the form of either a temporary or permanent custody order, depending on the stage of the divorce proceeding.

In contrast, if the court makes the permanent separation orders, generally those orders are not going to take into account many of the circumstances and reasonable needs of the parties.

the court may not award alimony to any spouse who commits adultery before the court issues a written property settlement or permanent order of separate maintenance.