Sentences with phrase «permission of the property owner»

It would prohibit drones over Tompkins County Jail, any area temporarily closed to the public by law enforcement, and over any mass gathering, or an open - air assembly of people, without the written permission of the property owner.

Longcore's reply, not surprisingly, was a laundry list of «policies needed to control feral cats,» the majority of which — either directly or indirectly — simply lead to more killing: mandatory spay / neuter, pet limits, prohibitions on roaming, and prohibitions of «feral cat feeding unless on feeder's property, or with permission of property owner and nearby owners / residents.»

Likewise a Monroe County ordinance makes it unlawful for «any owner or keeper of an animal other than a domestic cat willfully or negligently to allow the animal to run at large on public property or on any private property of another without permission of the property owner.»

They were there by permission of the property owner, so the arrest was not unlawful for lack of a warrant.

Not exact matches

All content, including text and images, appearing on the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada website (this «Website») is the property of the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada, or is used by it under license or with the permission of the copyright owner, and is protected by international copyright laws.

All other trademarks, registered trademarks, Product names and company names or logos mentioned on the Sites or Products are the property of their respective owners and may not be copied, imitated or used, in whole or in part, without the permission of the applicable trademark holder.

All Rights Reserved All Other Trademarks Are The Property Of Respective Owners And Are Used With Their Permission.

All other trademarks, service marks and trade names used on the Site are the property of their respective owners, and all of the above trademarks may not be copied, downloaded or otherwise exploited without the permission of RMG or the owner of such trademark, service mark or trade name, except as explicitly permitted in these Terms of Use.

All copyright and other intellectual property rights in all text, images, sound, software and other materials on this site are owned by Unilever PLC / Unilever NV and affiliated companies or are included with permission of the relevant owner.

Everything located on or in this Website, including the Microsites, is the exclusive property of Orlando Stroller Rentals, LLC, Inc., is used with express permission of the copyright and / or trademark owner, and / or is used as otherwise permitted by law.

The EPA has asked nine City of Lockport residential property owners for permission to take soil samples at their homes, because it is trying to determine whether there was off - site contamination from the former Flintkote plant on Mill Street, which the agency tore down last year in a Superfund cleanup project.

If baiting service is requested, a permission form will need to be signed by the occupant or owner of the property.

The owner of Grand Central Terminal filed a $ 1.1 billion lawsuit in US District Court in Manhattan that argued that the de Blasio administration, the NYC Council and SL Green Realty Corp. had deprived him of his property rights when the city gave SL Green permission to build a 1,501 - foot tall office tower, without having to buy any air rights from him.

Signs are supposed to be posted only on private property with the permission of the owner.

Nicholas said she and three members of the Lockport Common Council - Mark S. Devine, Anita Mullane and Joseph P. Oates - visited some of the property owners Sunday to convince them to give permission for the soil tests.

If I destroy your property without your permission, it is probably not acceptable — not because I am causing suffering to your property but rather to you as the owner of the property.

All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are used with their permission.

All other trademarks, servicemarks or registered trademarks are the property, and used with the permission, of their respective owners.

No part of www.dillonbeach.com website may be used / reproduced without written permission from Owners of Dillon Beach Property Management Inc..

All other trademarks, service marks, logos, slogans, domain names, and trade names are the property of their respective owners and are licensed to, or otherwise used with permission by, PetSmart Charities.

Finally, you know that PETA has filed various motions to have the case dismissed by arguing that the dog was worthless, she had no value beyond the cost of replacement for another dog, they had permission by the property owner to remove community cats so they can not be guilty of trespass for entering and killing a dog, the family is not entitled to punitive damages because PETA's theft and immediate killing of a happy, healthy, beloved dog is not «outrageous» conduct, and in an argument with racist overtones, that the family may not be in the country legally so PETA should be allowed to get away with the theft and murder of their dog.

Lawsuit update: PETA tells the Court that Maya was worthless and therefore they can't be financially liable to the family, that, at best, the dog had no value beyond the cost of replacement for another dog, they had permission by the property owner to remove community cats so they can not be guilty of trespass for entering and killing a dog, and the family is not entitled to punitive damages because PETA's theft and immediate killing of a happy, healthy, beloved dog is not «outrageous» conduct.

PETA had permission by the trailer park property owner to kill community cats so they can not be guilty of trespass for entering private property and killing a dog;

PETA, in turn, asked the court to throw out the lawsuit by arguing that the dog was unlicensed so was not worth anything, the dog had no value beyond the cost of replacement for another dog, they had permission by the property owner to remove community cats so they can not be guilty of trespass for entering and killing a dog, and the family is not entitled to punitive damages because PETA's theft and immediate killing of a happy, healthy, beloved dog is not «outrageous» conduct.

Except as otherwise indicated, this website, and all text, images, trademarks, trade names, logos and other content contained herein, including, without limitation, the TravelGround.com logo and all designs, text, graphics, pictures, downloads, information, data, software, sound, video and other files, domain names, web pages, patents, source code, meta tags, databases, hyperlinks, content and the selection and arrangement thereof are the proprietary property of TravelGround.com or its licensors or users and are protected from infringement by South African and international copyright laws and treaties and may not be reproduced or appropriated in any manner without the prior written permission of TravelGround.com (or the other respective owners, if applicable).

2005 - 2017 All website contents including pictures are the property of the owners and may not be used for any other purpose without express written permission by the owners of this website.

John Madden, NFL, NHL, NBA, PGA TOUR, UFC and FIFA are the property of their respective owners and used with permission.

John Madden, NFL and FIFA are the property of their respective owners and used with permission.

All copyrights or trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are used under permission.

And / 601.1 (c) sets some oddly specific parameters around truly residential use in alley lots — not a problem for Boneyard Studios» more mobile tiny houses on wheels (both of which are currently on private non-alley property with the owners» permission), but still a tad restrictive for our liking.

The use of imaging technology for aerial surveillance with radio control model aircraft having the capability of obtaining high - resolution photographs and / or video, or using any types of sensors, for the collection, retention, or dissemination of surveillance data or information on individuals, homes, businesses, or property at locations where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy is strictly prohibited by the AMA unless written expressed permission is obtained from the individual property owners or managers.

To that end, copyright laws offers intellectual property holders an additional property benefit, namely a limited - duration and limited - application monopoly right to exclude others from copying the work without the permission of the owner.

The first step in unraveling the legalities of the situation is seeing that only the property owner can give permission to enter (park) on the property.

Now: From what I can tell, US law says that if you have a reasonable expectation of privacy on some property, the owner of that property can't just give police permission to search it, nor can police ask the owner to search it.

Premises liability law is a legal area that establishes the duties of property owners to ensure the safety of their visitors, guests, and others who have legal permission to enter their premises.

[Addendum] The first step in unraveling the legalities of the situation is seeing that only the property owner can give permission to enter...

You must not do the following things: post material that is copyrighted, unless you are the copyright owner or have the permission of the copyright owner to post it; post material that reveals trade secrets, unless you own them or have the permission of the owner; post material that infringes on any other intellectual property rights of others or on the privacy or publicity rights of others; post material that is obscene, profane, defamatory, threatening, harassing, abusive, hateful, or embarrassing to another user of our website or any other person or entity; post a sexually - explicit image; post advertisements or solicitations of business; post chain letters or pyramid schemes; or impersonate another person.

In Newman, where an owner gives permission to drive on private property but not the highway, the owner is not liable for damages sustained as the result of a highway accident.

Another Person's Property: You can not be convicted of vandalism if the property you defaced / destroyed / damaged is your own or if you had the permission of the property'Property: You can not be convicted of vandalism if the property you defaced / destroyed / damaged is your own or if you had the permission of the property'property you defaced / destroyed / damaged is your own or if you had the permission of the property'property's owner.

Yes, the whole point of the question is either with owner's permission or over my own property - I added it to the question.

As with all private property, you're not allowed to use it in any way without permission of the owner.

Common Exclusions: No coverage for bodily injury / death sustained by any person while using or occupying a (1) covered vehicle while being used to carry persons or property for compensation or a fee; (2) a covered vehicle without the permission of you or a relative; or (3) a non-owned vehicle without the permission of the owner.

All trademarks are property of their respective owners and are used with permission by Global Underwriters

The owner of a property with one, such as a pool, is liable for anyone who uses it whether they have permission to or not.

No User shall transmit User Content or otherwise conduct or participate in any activities on the Web Site which, in the opinion of DriveSafeToday.com, Inc.'s counsel, are prohibited by law in applicable jurisdictions, including, without limitation, material or activities which (1) infringe any patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret or other proprietary right of any party (the «Rights»), unless User is the owner of the rights or has the express written permission of the owner to post or transmit such material to the Web Site; (2) infringe on any other intellectual property rights of others or on the privacy or publicity rights of others; (3) is obscene, defamatory, threatening, harassing, abusive, hateful, embarrassing or otherwise objectionable to another User or any other person or entity; (4) is sexually - explicit; (5) is an advertisement or solicitation of business or advocates an unsolicited or unrelated position or opinion; (6) represents any form of «chain letters» or pyramid scheme; (7) impersonates another person or entity; (8) intentionally or unintentionally violates any applicable local, state, national or international law while using or accessing the Web Site or the Materials; or (9) contains a virus, trojan, back door, logic bomb or any other form of malicious code.

Where this is the case, you must seek the permission of the ultimate owner of this intellectual property.

Any display or use of IReseumeCoverLetter.com and / or any of our content in any way other that what is expressly deemed permitted by these Terms of Service and the other applicable laws is strictly prohibited without a written permission issued by us or permission from the respective intellectual property owner.

The trial court concluded that the Buyer and her mother were trespassers on the property and the «For Sale» sign did not make her an invitee because she never had the permission of the land owner to enter the property.

Foreclosure property tours or preforeclosure tours (with the permission of the owners, of course).

The statutes describe an «invitee» as a person who is invited by the owner onto the property or comes to the property to do business with the owner, while a «trespasser» is an individual who enters the property without permission of the landowner.