Not exact matches
In assessing whether the restraint is reasonable, the
employer must have a legitimate interest deserving of protection, the restraint must go no further than protecting the
employer's legitimate interest and it must be in the
public interest to
permit this form of protection.
• An
employer would generally be
permitted to rely upon information provided by a responsible and expert
public authority.
Does it make a difference to the analysis of the appropriateness of requiring Canadian expeerience, whether the person to be
permitted to work here will work for an
employer, i.e. under supervision and in a structured framework of practices, or whether the person will be an independent service provider with individual clients from the general
public?
Another suggestion was to add a section that
permitted the transmission of protected health information to
employers when reasonably necessary to comply with federal, state, or municipal laws and regulations, or when necessary for
public or employee safety and health.