Some members may insist on having one
person at a time speak, or perhaps there may be a time limit set for each person.
Not exact matches
Now, he writes books, records episodes of a popular podcast and spends
time at motivational
speaking events that often center on helping
people communicate more effectively.
They can keep in touch with friends, look
at photos of their vacations, read news stories they suggest, play
time - wasting games, invite
people to their parties and
speak and be heard.
I
speak with
people all the
time who ask me how I got in touch with someone
at a movie studio or a management company.
At the same
time I want
people to
speak freely.
We've all had to attend events and conferences
at any given point — ever notice how we tend to
speak to the same
people almost every
time?
«
At the
time, I didn't know that, generally
speaking, you don't ask
people to be on the board unless they're vested in the company,» she says.
«Only one
person can
speak at a
time and the video and audio always seem to have problems.
The rest of my
time is spent working on launching a beer school series in Toronto and preparing to
speak at beer festivals — the latter of which involves coming up with fun ways to talk about beer to
people who've been drinking it all day, which is challenging.
The remote workforce tools are helping to propagate all of this to the country as we
speak with the right
people to help build the next hubs
at the right
times in the right places.
While that's more than a hundred
times the standard savings rate
at national banks, the online - only banks that offer such rates don't provide physical service locations, meaning that you won't be able to
speak with a banker in
person to manage your account.
Intent signals come in many shapes and forms, ranging from spending a lot of
time looking
at sales - oriented resources on your website to using keywords in Google searches that
speak to the types of considerations
people make
at the bottom of the funnel.
Furthermore, going from physically interacting with
at least 30
people a day
at my old job to only
speaking with a couple of folks to nobody a day is a let down that takes
time getting used to.
When it was my turn to
speak, I felt like the last
person standing who would defend value investing, a process I still strongly believed in despite all evidence to the contrary
at that
time.
And a
time of contemplation, and that they need to look
at their inner selves to allow oneness with all things... My take on the Eastwood empty chair, was only intended to signify the
People Speaking but the leader not hearing them, hence talking to an empty chair.
At times, Harris» approach tends towards obscuring the truth when it encounters the complexities of hurting
people, but perhaps truth
spoken in love is what the broken need most.
At one
time he
spoke about the vision of Maujer Street» a vision of a life of genuine community between
people in the midst of a great city; more recently he has
spoken of the Kingdom of God, the hope for a future where God's rule would more fully permeate the lives and institutions of men on this earth.
At the same
time,
people who go into ministry
speak of being called by God.
And every
time after they had finished
speaking their truth and their journey, they wept
at the ways that Jesus had met him in their darkness,
at how he had given them friends and community to walk alongside of them,
at how even the most lost moments or
people of their lives had been restored.
I'm
speaking from personal expirence from my encounter with evil and none believers of GOD... Last there is a list which you can draw from to know if a
person is possessed but the only way you could know that is to go through it yourself without turning your back on God and keeping God 1st
at all
times even in the darkest of
times....
At the same
time it was estimated that there yet remained five hundred to a thousand other language groups
spoken by substantial numbers of
people into which translations should be made, and many of them will be.
God, who
at sundry
times and in divers manners
spake in
time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days
spoken unto us by [his] Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; Who being the brightness of [his] glory, and the express image of his
person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high; Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.
Among them are those that we make concerning the right use of our
time, energy, or money; those regarding how to treat
persons whose lives touch ours; and those concerning when to
speak and when to be silent when convictions are
at stake.
Hebrews 1:1 KJV God, who
at sundry
times and in divers manners
spake in
time past unto the fathers by the prophets, 2 Hath in these last days
spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; 3 Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his
person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high; 4 Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.
Clive, you point out how others often don't understand what Jesus was saying; but while Jesus often labors to try and make things clear to the unbeliever («Oh, you of little faith) or
at the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following hi
at the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (
At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following hi
At the
time they didn't understand that he
spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that
people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following him.
At a Sunday Rector's Forum, I listened to thoughtful
people speak about the most pressing social issues of our
time.
Rather, it is
speaking the right truth to the right
person at the right
time in the right way for the right reason.
But I worked through it, realizing that God
speaks to
people in terms they can understand and that this is what the pagan world could understand
at that
time.
As its first full -
time representative, Billy Graham traveled throughout America and Europe,
speaking at rallies and teaching pastors and youth leaders how to develop evangelism programs for young
people.
Whatever may have been the actual course of events, historically
speaking, which the New Testament means to signify when it
speaks of the resurrection of Jesus Christ, it is
at least clear that it was the conviction of the New Testament writers, building on the testimony of the disciples after the crucifixion of Jesus — as it has been the continuing conviction of millions of Christian
people since that
time — that far from Jesus» being «put out of the way» by his death
at the hands of the Roman authorities in Palestine, he was «let loose into the world.»
At all
times in Israel
people spoke much about evil powers, but not about one which, for longer than the purpose of temptation, was allowed to rule in God's stead; never, not even in the most deadly act of requital by God, is the bond of immediacy broken.
To put it in the way in which others have
spoken, both eucharistic celebration and proclamation of the gospel should always be in a fashion that is appropriate to the witness of the Christian past and
at the same
time available for the thinking and feeling of the
people who take part.
Speaking only for myself I would judge that the
person must not have been concerned enough about the consequences
at the
time they committed the act to have prevented themselves.
The idea, therefore, of a covenant as the foundation charter (so to
speak) of the
people of God was very much alive
at the
time, and there can be no doubt what Jesus had in mind when he invited his followers to drink of the cup of the covenant: he was formally installing them as foundation members of the new
people of God.
At the same
time it is instructive to remember that these creeds
speak mainly to the doctrines of God and the
person of Christ.
Context matters — God
speaks at a particular moment in
time, to a particular
people group, for a reason.
Just as the ministry of all Christians was rediscovered as an important New Testament motif
at the
time of the Protestant Reformation, the Bible can always
speak some new, liberating word to the need of the
people of God.
The Bible is the inspired, preserved record of God's revelation to His
people in history, climaxing in the work of His Son, Jesus: «Long ago,
at many
times and in many ways, God
spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days he has
spoken to us by his Son» (Hebrews 1:1 - 2).
He didn't say it to me, but He said to the
people of His day, which means that if I had been living
at that
time, He would have
spoken to me as well.
But religious love is only man's natural emotion of love directed to a religious object; religious fear is only the ordinary fear of commerce, so to
speak, the common quaking of the human breast, in so far as the notion of divine retribution may arouse it; religious awe is the same organic thrill which we feel in a forest
at twilight, or in a mountain gorge; only this
time it comes over us
at the thought of our supernatural relations; and similarly of all the various sentiments which may be called into play in the lives of religious
persons.
And maybe next
time you are called to
speak at a missions conference, rather than talk about everything you are doing for Jesus overseas, you could take some
time to praise the
people in the pews for everything they are doing for Jesus on this side of the sea.
However, generically
speaking I continue to be surprised
at how many
times there are significant issues in families and marriages that involve, as one of the major components, if not THE major component, crisis brought about because
people's perceived needs and rights (I call them their «wants») are not being met by others.
And again, God was physically
speaking with
people at the
time.
««The» anti-Semite, he seems to imply all through the book, is always the same kind of a
person, recognizable
at a glance, and, so to
speak, in action the whole
time.
New Delhi said: «[This unity] is being made visible as all in each place who are baptized into Jesus Christ and confess him as Lord and Savior are brought by the Holy Spirit into one fully committed fellowship, holding the one apostolic faith, preaching the one gospel, breaking the one bread, joining in common prayer, and having a corporate life reaching out in witness and service to all and who
at the same
time are united with the whole Christian fellowship in all places and all ages, in such wise that ministry and members are accepted by all, and that all can act and
speak together as occasion requires for the tasks to which God calls His
people.»
Furthermore, the Christian versions of the household codes are the only ones that
speak directly to the less powerful members of the household — the slaves, wives, and children — probably because the church
at the
time consisted of just such powerless
people.
When Jesus
spoke with somebody,
at the same
time Christ or God
spoke with the certain
person.
To the world I say stop hating each other and do good help those in need, feed
people who are hungry, do good to all you meet, Jesus never
spoke out against any one except to the religious
people at that
time and it is not any different now!
These
people lived
at different
times, in different cultures, in different places, and
spoke different languages, had different beliefs and values, and faced different issues and challenges.
For years theologians have been cutting themselves further and further adrift from the broader sets of meanings by which ordinary
people steer their lives; yet
at the same
time they have clung desperately to the notion that they
speak as autonomous experts, that their definitions of what is real are sufficient.