Sentences with phrase «person at fault for the accident»

Attorney J. Todd Tenge can put his extensive experience to work for you — building a strong case against the person at fault for the accident — and increase your financial compensation.

When the person at fault for an accident does not have insurance, Uninsured Motorist Bodily Injury will cover injuries and damages you incur that the at - fault party is legally liable for, such as medical treatment and lost wages up to the limits you select.

If the person at fault for an accident doesn't have insurance - or doesn't have enough insurance - Uninsured / Underinsured Motorist Bodily Injury will pay for injuries and damages you suffer that the at - fault party is legally liable for, such as medical treatment and lost wages.

This may pay for damages when a covered person is injured and the person at fault for the accident does not have liability insurance.

Instead, the primary insurance that is responsible to pay the claim is the insurance company of the person at fault for the accident.

Not exact matches

There's not a straightforward answer, as this depends on if you've given permission for the other person to drive your car, the accident, damages, and who is officially at fault, etc..

Typically provides coverage for an insured person, covered family members and covered passengers for certain reasonable and necessary expenses, such as medical and hospital expenses, income continuation, loss of services, and funeral expenses for bodily injury caused by a covered accident, regardless of who was at fault.

If you are at fault in an accident that injures another person, your auto liability insurance would cover up to $ 250,000 for that person's injuries.

If you are at fault in an accident, the other person can sue you for serious injuries.

A pure comparative negligence system basically means that a person can receive compensation from any at - fault party after a car accident, regardless of the percentage of fault that they themselves are responsible for the accident.

Through a tort claim, car accident victims whose brain injuries, are caused by the careless behavior of another person, are eligible to receive compensation for their losses and the costs of future care from the at fault drivers insurance company.

Even if that person was not at fault for the accident, they still must contact their own insurance company before they do anything else.

In comparative fault states, liability for an accident can be shared by the at - fault party and the injured person.

If you are not at fault for injuries or losses resulting from a snowmobiling accident you may also be entitled to commence a tort claim against the person responsible to recover compensation.

This change to the accident benefit regime will mean that many more people will have to sue the «at - fault» driver for their future medical costs beyond the $ 50,000.

People, fortunately, even sometimes insurance adjusters, generally presume that in a rear - end car crash, the person that strikes another from behind is automatically deemed negligent and at fault for the accident.

No matter the cause of the auto accident, whether it be a distracted driver, disregard for traffic regulations, drowsy driver, or even driving under the influence of alcohol, our attorneys have the experience needed to deal with the insurance, other attorneys or persons who are at fault.

Other factors that may determine the time involved to resolve your claim are whether fault for your injuries is an issue with the insurer, how many parties are involved, such as in the case where more than one person might be at fault for your injuries, and whether you might have had previous injuries or accidents that the insurer might argue are contributing to your symptoms or length of recovery.

For example, when an individual is hurt in an auto accident, his or her insurance company and the insurance company of the at - fault driver will demand that s / he provide a recorded statement about how the collision happened, what that person's injuries are, and to get a whole host of other irrelevant information about you.

When a motorcyclist is involved in an accident due to the negligent or reckless actions of another person, they have the right to seek damages from the at - fault party liable for their injuries.

The British Columbia Negligence Act provides that when an injured person is partly at fault for the accident, she can still recover a portion of her damages, although her degree of fault will reduce the award in a proportionate amount.

In Virginia, if you are in any way responsible for causing the accident, you can not recover from another driver, even if that person was more at fault than you were.

Texas uses a «modified» comparative fault rule to decide what to do when the person seeking compensation is also found partly at fault for the accident.

First of all, as mentioned above, it's illegal to drive in California if you're uninsured, and secondly, if the other person is at fault for the accident, your damages that you can recover are severely limited due to the fact that you're uninsured.

If the injured person was where they were not supposed to be, or somewhere they should have expected the risk of possible injuries, the person who caused the accident may not be at fault because they were not responsible for protecting the injured person.

If an injured person was not acting safely in a situation, that may be contributory negligence, and they will not be able to recover even if another party was at fault for the accident.

The basic rule used to decide who is at fault is this: if a person involved in an accident was less careful than another person, then the less careful individual is at fault for at least a portion of the damages suffered by the individual who took heed.

If the person who died in the accident was not at fault for the motor vehicle accident, family members may also have personal injury claims.

As an example, if the person who hit you was traveling 75 mph in a 35 mph residential zone, he or she is obviously at fault, however, if you ran a red light and that's when you were hit, you may be at fault for a certain percentage of the accident, and your compensation will be reduced by that percentage.

Under this statute, a person can only recover compensation from an accident if he or she is not more at fault for the crash than the others who are involved.

If a driver is found to be 51 % or more at fault in an accident, the law will prevent that person from recovering even a penny for their injuries.

Then, if it is determined that someone else was at - fault for the accident, the workers» compensation insurance company has a right to be reimbursed from other insurance companies, which can include the at - fault party and / or that person's insurance company or even your own insurance company.

If you've been in a Jersey City car accident and someone else is at fault, you reasonably expect that the person has insurance coverage that will pay for your losses.

Florida is considered a no - fault state, which means each person's own car insurance will pay for injuries and damages resulting from an accident, no matter who was at fault.

Currently, all people hurt in an accident are entitled to no fault benefits for loss of income and medial / rehabilitation benefits, regardless of who is at fault for the accident.

The person who is found to be «at fault» for the Texas motorcycle accident can be held accountable for your injuries and damages in your Texas motorcycle accident.

More importantly, if you are found to be at fault for an accident causing injury or death to another person, you may be held personally responsible for his / her medical costs and other losses.

Once you've proved that you suffered harm, then you have to link that to the accident, and prove that the other person was at fault for the accident.

For example, the person at fault for a motor vehicle accident could be required to pay for the victim's medical bills, rehabilitation costs, loss of present and future wages, pain and suffering, permanent impairment and other damagFor example, the person at fault for a motor vehicle accident could be required to pay for the victim's medical bills, rehabilitation costs, loss of present and future wages, pain and suffering, permanent impairment and other damagfor a motor vehicle accident could be required to pay for the victim's medical bills, rehabilitation costs, loss of present and future wages, pain and suffering, permanent impairment and other damagfor the victim's medical bills, rehabilitation costs, loss of present and future wages, pain and suffering, permanent impairment and other damages.

In summary, contrary to what some people feel, whenever you are involved in an accident involving damage to your vehicle, regardless of whether you are at - fault or not, access ICBC's system to get the best possible deal for the repairs.

For example, if an injured person has $ 5,000 in income loss but ICBC has already paid $ 1,200 in TTDs, the injured person is only entitled to recover $ 3,800 in a claim against the driver at fault for the accideFor example, if an injured person has $ 5,000 in income loss but ICBC has already paid $ 1,200 in TTDs, the injured person is only entitled to recover $ 3,800 in a claim against the driver at fault for the accidefor the accident.

Personal Injury Protection (PIP) is an insurance coverage for medical and other expenses such as lost wages resulting from an auto accident, for people specified in the policy, regardless of who is at fault in the accident.

These benefits are available to the injured person regardless of who is at fault for the accident.

In other words, the person or company who caused the harm must be at fault for your accident.

Injured people often ask me why they have to ask for benefits from their own car insurance company when they were not at fault for the accident.

We have been very successful in helping people who have suffered a personal injury from an accident for which they were not at fault.

If it finds that this person was 30 percent at fault for causing the collision, he or she still may recover up to 70 percent of his or her costs and losses from another driver who held the remaining responsibility for the accident.

In New Mexico, a driver who is at fault for a highway accident usually must pay for any harm to people or property that arises from it.

Car accidents generally have the unfortunate effect of hurting those involved, even the people not at fault for the collision.

There is an additional fact that must be proven in a Virginia personal injury claim: The person making the claim can not have contributed in any way to his or her own injuries or be at fault for the accident in any way.