Sentences with phrase «person at the court»

Esther had become the most clever and powerful person at court.

However, Mark was expected to appear in person at the court on Monday to defend the election that brought him to power for fifth term.

mentioned how Matterhorn and Court Innovations» Co-Founder J.J. Prescott are increasing access to the courts through providing an online alternative to appearing in - person at court.

The request for this additional traffic school course needs to be made in person at the Court Clerk's office.

These options include sending payments via mail, paying in person at the Court, through the automated phone system by calling 1-800-533-0583 and by using your credit card to make the payment online.

If after weighing the pros and cons of simply paying your ticket, you have decided you just want to pay it and move on, you have a few options in most states from paying it online, by mail, or in person at the court house.

The final option is to pay in person at the court house listed on the ticket itself.

A: When the court has decided your fine, you can pay in person at the court or by mail.

To take a driving course, you must request it in person at the court or receive permission in writing.

To take the course, you must first request this option in person at the Court or send a written request by mail.

However, if you plead guilty, you may pay for the ticket in person at court during business hours.

However, some tickets are not eligible to be paid online and must be paid in - person at the court.

Motorists who want to contest their traffic citations must appear in person at the court on the date written on their ticket.

Instead, you will be required to appear in person at the court that issued your citation.

You may obtain instructions, information and templates for completing a Trial by Written Declaration in person at the court, or by clicking here: Get the Kern County Trial By Written Declaration Form

You may attain instructions and obtain the necessary forms for a Trial by Written Declaration in person at the court, or by selecting the following link: Get the San Diego County Trial by Written Declaration Form.

Not exact matches

The Eastern Guruma native tital determination, resolved by mutual consent of local indigenous people and mining interests among others, was ratified today at a Federal Court hearing near Tom Price.

In the 2013 investigations, managers used more than 25 stolen identities to employ at least 115 people in the country illegally, knowing they could pay below minimum wage, according to court documents.

«If they are constantly in court fighting with consumers for money, are you willing to put yourself at risk with that kind of person?»

«Some people still seem to like the fact that they could at least put a tennis court on the property,» Brennan said.

At the very least, controversial emails or other communications from high - profile or powerful people that are disclosed publicly — no matter how they are obtained — are considered in the court of public opinion where no rules of admissibility apply.

Maybe at the end of the day these emails will have the most significant impact on individual dealings with the people who wrote them, even in matters that have not yet registered with the broader public and even in matters will never be considered in court.

His case illustrates the difficulty of succeeding with such a defense at a time when a Colorado court is preparing to hear similar arguments in the trial over a movie theater shooting in which 12 people were killed.

The filing also argues that the 9th Circuit made the test for defeating a trademark too strict, and that it should — based on an older decision by a different appeals court — instead have simply looked at how most people use the word in question.

So far, about 200 people have been arrested at a construction zone near the pipeline's terminal site in Burnaby for allegedly breaking a court injunction keeping protesters away.

Elliott does not seem to share those qualms: On at least three occasions, according to both court testimony and the accounts of seven people who spoke with Fortune, children of people facing the hedge fund's attack have been pulled into the fray in some way, in an apparent bid to gain either information on or leverage against their parents.

In the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller case, the Supreme Court ruled 5 - 4 that the Second Amendment protects a person's right to own guns — at a federal level — and in 2010 the court said that protection applies at a local level as Court ruled 5 - 4 that the Second Amendment protects a person's right to own guns — at a federal level — and in 2010 the court said that protection applies at a local level as court said that protection applies at a local level as well.

The provision at issue at the Supreme Court protects people who expose the kind of corporate misdeeds that arose at Enron.

The league would have to prove this in court with evidence, not just state it as a fact — and it's not clear at all that watching a couple of tweeted highlight GIFs is going to make substantial numbers of people refuse to pay money to watch an NFL game.

But that kind of targeted tracking would not require broad access to records of people unconnected to terror suspects and their known associates, which is hinted at by both Sen. Udall's remarks and the high rate of modifications imposed on Section 215 orders by the FISA court.

Zachary Cruz, 18, brother of the teenager who killed 17 people at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High, sits in court after he was arrested for trespassing at the school in March.

A judge at the Reykjanes District Court on Friday ordered two people to remain in custody.

Will the SEC take this opportunity to clarify that same - sex couples in civil unions, domestic partnerships, and similar legal relationships intended to give them at least some of the economic benefits of marriage, are «spouses» to one another, and thus eligible for the alternative accredited investor qualification standard made available to persons who are married (with the Supreme Court's recent decision striking down Section 3 of DOMA, it is already clear that persons in same - sex marriages are «spouses» to one another)?

In a meeting at the White House, Mr. Sessions informed Mr. Trump that he would not defend what he considered an unconstitutional order in court, according to people familiar with the conversation, and officials at the White House and the Department of Homeland Security have made the case to the president that his administration would look foolish if it argued in favor of preserving it.

Carlos Barria Reuters An internal court video shows British investigator Peter Humphrey arriving at a courtroom after a lunch break, during his trial at Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court August 8, court video shows British investigator Peter Humphrey arriving at a courtroom after a lunch break, during his trial at Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court August 8, Court August 8, 2014.

... [People] behind the new group acknowledge that conservatives have been much more effective at turning the courts into a rallying point for their voters.

Like his predecessors at prior historic turns, U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, representing the people, has pursued and denigrated Microsoft with a fervor that borders on the evangelical.

Woohae Cho AFP Getty Images People watch television news showing Jang Song - thaek in court before his execution on December 12, 2013, at the rail station in Seoul on December 13, 2013.

Church - state decisions by the Supreme Court, and by the judiciary more generally, sometimes seem to be aimed at replacing this inconveniently religious people with another people more to its secular fancy.

Hollis Professor of Divinity Emeritus of Harvard Divinity School, he is the oldest living person to have played center court at Wimbledon.

She said: «On the day when the Belfast Court of Appeal ruled that it is up to the Stormont Assembly to decide on abortion law in Northern Ireland, the Government at Westminster has now decided to ride roughshod over the views of the vast majority of people in Northern Ireland.»

The Jehovah's Witnesses Administrative Center has 30 days to appeal to a three - person panel at the Supreme Court, but Jehovah's Witnesses say they anticipate serious problems, regardless of any pending appeal.

But look at what she and her supporters had to go through: threats; intimidation; ridicule; loss of friends; debt; years or months of sleeplessness, stress and anxiety; self - doubt; fear; demands for proof of medical records, police reports, emails, and court documents; then finally being believed not because you are a person but only because you produce authoritative authentication.

Listen Humble themselves (that is, don't control the situation, and don't assume they understand or perceive the situation perfectly) Identify how they contributed to the situation (whether consciously or unconsciously, directly or indirectly) Take responsibility Apologise Allow the other person to express what they want done (and do it, if it is within the pastor's ability, and truly helpful) Support the other person's decisions, even if the pastor disagree with them Empower the other person at every step Part friends if possible, and at peace, if at all possible (and never go to court — Jesus and Paul call this dangerous and ridiculous, respectively)

The statement does not even hint at the possibility of a Supreme Court ruling that would extend due process and equal protection to unborn persons.

And might it finally be best to remove the problem at the root simply by avoiding the hiring of people who bear these religious and moral sentiments, which the Supreme Court has now declared to be prejudicial?

Councillor Toby Neal at Nottingham City Council was quoted by the Nottingham Post as saying: «Whilst respecting the court's decision, I feel the judge has missed the point of us bringing this action, which was to protect people from feeling bullied and intimidated while accessing hospital services - something we don't welcome in our city.»

There is no way that any of these new people could do as bad of a job at running our country as the current Congress, President, and Supreme Court has done or in the last 30 years.

If the people were the final arbiters of who should rule over them, then authority rested, in the last recourse, not in the king, but in the people, however submissive these might at times consent to show themselves toward the court.

The Supreme Court is arguing about the rights of those religious nuts from Wesboro Baptist Church who interrupt and slander people at soldiers funerals.