Sentences with phrase «person claim the points»

Not exact matches

The right thing to do when confronted with a mistake is to own up to it, not to make a series of bizarre claims in defense then insult the profession of the people who correctly pointed out the error.

Many people pointed out that Roku has a powerful multi-service search function (the company claims to include more than 100 providers) while others highlighted useful third - party search options such as reelworld.com and canistream.it

She points out the discrepancies between the amount of time people claim to spend on work during a week, for example, and the number of hours that studies using time diaries actually show we spend making productive contributions to our jobs.

The last widespread survey (i.e., not the barrage of fickle online polls that appear every Valentine's Day) was by the Society for Human Resource Management in 2005, in which 40 % of people claimed they had dated colleagues at some point during their career.

Trump also maintained that Daniels's claims of an affair are false, and as Vox's Matt Yglesias points out, Trump is basically saying he's pretty easy to blackmail since he's apparently willing to pay large sums of money to keep people from saying things that aren't even true.

Vanderkam pointed out that if she'd been pressed at the start of the week to carve out seven hours to put toward a priority like mentoring people at work, the executive would have claimed to be too busy to come up with that extra pocket of time.

Since then, additional sources and reports continue to point to the same conclusion: that hundreds, not dozens, of people died from the storm, despite claims by President Trump and Puerto Rican officials that the count is 62 or fewer.

A better strategy would be to point out how one doesn't need religion to be a moral person, and then demonstrate how some of the people that claim to be a beacon for religious zealots (the GOP) practice an existence devoid of morality.

So, you blame your mistake on the person who pointed it out to you by claiming that the person who pointed it out, and a whole bunch of others, has ADD?

FAIL» = > my claim was that hundreds of people believed that had witnessed a resurrected Christ, again, I accept you concede that point as you did nt attempt to refute it.

That however does NOT mean that the bible is not true (An ad hominem (Latin for «to the man» or «to the person»), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to negate the truth of a claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or belief of the person supporting it)

I am merely pointing out that this «new» information has been around for 200 years and the claims that these people are making that martyrdom was somehow not important to the rise of Christianity is false.

If he would fulfill my need, and prove he exists, I would pay more attention to what other people claim he wants and does not want, but at this point, he seems as invisible and irrelevant as Santa Claus.

They claim that if physicians are allowed to kill people, even at the patient's request, «it would come to the point of the Nazis in the past.»

At several junctures I have pointed to the absence of any framework by which the Oliners can distinguish qualitative differences in the ways persons are religious, the ways they make sense of the claims of care, and the ways they interpret what is their duty or obligation.

Yes I know this will happen because I have been through these arguments time and time again and when I pull out my Bible that people claim to have read and match it to the scientific evidence that points very clearly to the validity and truth of the Bible they shut up and don't want to hear it.

I think it's pretty likely that the person reporting the abuse thought the point was to condemn Christianity by saying Hitler was Christian, rather than to establish the facts in response to the erroneous claim that Hitler was atheist.

Urshan also equated the apostolic faith with Assyrian Christianity to the point of defending Nestorius and claiming that the western church went astray with its language of person.

Also, your point of Bronze Age peoples being intellectually inferior, you really didn't put up anything to back up that claim either.

The advocates of every religion know they have no evidence for anything they claim, and they know people will challenge them on this point.

Given that people can be deluded or more often, allow their desire to believe something destroy their objectivity to the point their conclusions aren't reliable, your claims about private, personal experiences no one outside your head can verify simply aren't enough for anyone but you.

Exactly my point; if according to the Bible and Christ's words himself — that even the Son of God has no idea about the 2nd coming; I am now supposed to believe what men on earth say??!!!!! Seriously, how stupid are some people — these are the same people who claim they are religious elite!

This vision serves as «a viable point of departure for oppressed persons, suggesting that in the quest for liberation oppressed persons must claim their freedom.»

A comment on one specific point: you claim that one reason people are becoming Christians is that they lack access to information.

Point is, the people who claim that the date has been found and the people who claim that it can not be found are quoting from the very same Bible.

The God of the Covenant laid claim upon his people pointing them to a new life and a new destiny.

As I am aware that many are promoting a popular view that has been rationalized by whatever means, however you have failed to provide a shred of the emperical proof you claim, and as far as personal experiences, my point exactly has been that they exist in the realm of feeling and emotion, which any rational person would willingly admit is often self - deceptive.....

The pity is it has been bastardized by people who've laid claim to the person and message of Jesus and used it to further the agenda of their flesh, thereby missing the point entirely..........

The sect's leader, with a bandana covering his face, led the army into the village and pointed out people he claimed were «subversives.»

The point I wanted to make is that God invites His people to study His Word in depth, to use the minds that He gave us and renewed, to gradually discover the deep levels of His progressive revelation, and to compare the internal consistency of His message to claims from other religions which invariably crumble upon thoughtful analysis.

This article does point out that people claim others are committing blasphemy for what they themselves don't even understand.

It is quite disgusting how non-christians claim to be the «superior» person and try to prove their point through vicious attacks.

How come some people on here claim to possess a logical and fact based mindset, yet can't explain their point of view without acting hostile and demeaning toward «religious people».

My point is that the burden of proof lies with the person making the claim.

Consequently, the analyst must change at some point from the consoler who takes the part of the patient against the world to the person who puts before the patient the claim of the world.

We may now add, in the light of the above discussion of the Chosen People, that the Christian claim becomes invalid at the point where it becomes exclusive.

The point of this claim is to force people to think about the goods and goals in their lives...

I said that he was controversial, and that the people who DO believe those things about him can point to some pretty solid evidence to back up their claim.

The writeup (by Census author Jesse Ball) does have a solid point about how many people claim to love the Bible without having actually read it, and he recommends reading Agota Kristof's The Notebook instead, which is excellent, and you can read it and the Bible.

With these rules in place, Darwinists can claim to have proved that natural selection crafted moths, trees, and people, and point to the peppered - moth observation as proof.

It is written in the book of Dawkins 2:28 - 34 «Then shall the bearers of false witness claiming supernatural phenomenon and worshipers of deitys fall upon the righteous with their knives and swords, tearing my people apart who did nothing but point out that their God's did not exist.

As to the claim that creeds impose the will of the elite, Pelikan points out cases — most notably the opposition to Arianism in the century or so after the Council of Nicaea — in which, in John Henry Newman's words, «The Catholic people, in the length and breadth of Christendom, were the obstinate champions of Catholic truth, and the bishops were not.»

Underwood pointed out that, in the modern world, to claim to be a believer who loves God and neighbor, and yet not to attempt to be an effective person in the formation of just social policies, is to talk nonsense.

- All the evidence points to people constructing religion... and then claimed it came from god.

The point of the Hitler v. Stalin v. Mao page is that the causes of excess deaths need to be understood before people go making claims like «atheists killed 100M people in the 20th century».

So the point of this is, atheists, is that if you're claiming someone is a lune for having God intereacting with them, it's similar to saying they're a lune for receiving a phone call from someone they know, because phone calls are selective too, they can consume someone's senses, and there's no guarantee that the person calling, will contact everyone over the planet... just to prove themself to someone that isn't a friend... or someone that doesn't love God.

As Alexis de Tocqueville points out in Democracy in America, however, we modern democratic persons refuse to defer to the privileged claims of aristocrats even or especially when they're deserved.

I have heard people claim theory as fact over and over again, to the point where they ridicule any other position..

I want to weep when there's a disaster and people are hurt or die and some self - described Christian personality claims that God made it happen to punish X because of Y. Unfortunately there are people who are gullible enough to believe such drivel to the point of sending the drivel masters money so they can continue to spout their nonsense.

In case Shraeve missed it, the whole point of this article is that a lot of people claim to follow Christ, but in fact believe the exact opposite of what Christ taught.