Sentences with phrase «person making the claim»

This is accompanied by figures showing that the numbers of people making claims for compensation has been falling.

With decades of experience, they've helped thousands of people make claims against large medical companies and organisations which produced defective medical products.

Worse, you'll be one of many people making a claim against that policy.

It does not work by unqualified people making claims on television or the Internet.

One level applies when, as a result of a single occurrence, a single person makes a claim against you.

There are a few reasons people make this claim.

Here is part of the reason why people make the claim you seem to have made.

Risk reflects the likelihood of the insured person making a claim.

People making claims for minimum amounts usually only need to provide basic evidence of their entitlement.

Worse, you'll be one of many people making a claim against that policy.

What I suspect is more likely is that many people making this claim are just repeating what they have heard on trading desks since, well, forever.

Turkey burgers tend to get knocked on a lot with people making claims like they are dry or boring and bland.

I imagine that these people claim to have done similar things, but there are lots of groups today who make such claims, and as soon as people make these claims, big alarm bells need to start going off in our heads.

Did people make a claim that they had seen a resurrected Jesus?

Questions - Getting value for money from companies marketing services to help people make claims against missold Payment Protection Insurance Legislation, revising the system for electing British Members of the European Parliament, dealing with any consequences for social cohesion and criminality of the withdrawal of civil legal aid for social welfare law cases, annual value of employers» national insurance contributions Legislation - Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill

It is not every year that new statutes are passed in the Golden State that may affect persons making claims for injuries or wrongful death but, this year there are a few, important new laws as follows:

To say we do not have such rules in England is not quite right, as, amongst other things, there are statutory provisions allowing certain people making a claim against an estate if not adequately provided for — importantly, these are not exactly the same as the foreign «forced heirship» concepts.

In any personal injury claim, the attorney for the other person (who usually represents that person's insurance company) often will try to argue that the injured person making the claim was partially at fault in order to avoid responsibility for the injuries.

But Money Adviser says that only 6 % of people make a claim during a five year period of having a policy, so the likelihood that you would is tiny.

In this case, if a person claims that a single ent.ity is the supreme authority (also «sole») and there are others making the claim — the value is not in the number of people making the claim but what you want to assess is the overriding reasons that allow the person to reject one, several or all claims or accept one, several or all claims.

There are certain individuals who do not require study permits, these being family of diplomats, staff of diplomats, certain armed forces members, and persons making a claim for refugee protection.

Soon after however the floodgates opened with people making claims that where simply not true, or were misinterpretations of things, or it was stating as facts things that were not.

«People make claims about having 20 years» experience,» Wiliam told me, «but they really just have one year's experience repeated 20 times.»

«Science... does not work by unqualified people making claims on television or the Internet, «he says.

For example, if you have vehicle insurance with a 50/100 liability, you would have a maximum coverage of $ 50,000 if a single person makes a claim against you.

The second level of coverage applies if more than one person makes a claim against you as a result of a single occurrence.

But the people making these claims aren't shady salespeople pushing odd herbal remedies or gizmos of dubious effectiveness.

The person making the accusation is the person making the claim, he has to provide evidence of guilt, not the other way around.

When someone makes a positive claim that something does exists THEN and ONLY THEN do we require the burden that the person making the claim provide proof.

Besides all of that, the burden of proof lies upon the person making the claim and the religious are the ones making a claim that something outside the observable universe actually exists.

For that matter, taking a stance like that, calls serious doubt about the intelligence of the person making that claim.

The proof does not fall on us Atheists... the burden of proof falls on the people making the claim.

The person making the claim has the burden to show their claim is true, a.k.a. the «burden of proof».

Greg, Usually the person making the claim provides the proof.

Burden of proof goes to the person making the claim that something is true / exists, or if the claim is particularly extraordinary.

No, the burden of proof in on the person making a claim.

The person making the claim has the burden of proving it — and extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

My point is that the burden of proof lies with the person making the claim.

Put simply, the burden of proof rests with the person making the claim.

We can withhold acceptance of claims until the people making the claims meets their burdan of proof.

The onus of proof is on the person making the claim.

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.

The person making the claim for a thing existing must provide evidence.