Sentences with phrase «person perspective seeing»

For the first time this allowed players to have a first person perspective seeing the track ahead of them.

While Modern Warefare 2 was indeed quite a visual feat, Surface 1 & 2 were some of the very first instances of snow transgression in the first person perspective we saw.

Not exact matches

Other people can see things in us that we can't always see ourselves, allowing them to offer a perspective that's much different than our own.

Add to that the changing trends we see in the workplace with more remote workers, big economy workers, people that have different perspectives, all of that leads to a greater need to get employees engaged.

A more effective approach is to show a range of perspectives, let people see where their views are on a spectrum and come to a conclusion on what they think is right.

Of course, each of us has the tendency to see things from our own perspective: My problem is bigger than the other person's.

Because they can see the other person's perspective, they're better able to recommend the right product or service.

People who are capable of inspiring you to see things differently, who can help you gain new perspective, seem to arrive just when you really need them.

Instead of seeing the person who wronged you as «bad,» look at things from their perspective, or find something you can appreciate or empathize with.

«I think we'll see an evolution of these algorithms over time because I think variety is the spice of life and you want to see interesting things and you want to see other perspectives, and we want people to have that experience as well.»

I think most of their customers are people who have been disenfranchised for a long time by traditional wealth managers who charge much more and do much less, and from their perspective, I can see why going with PC would be a great decision.

Ignore the other person's point of view — ask your counterpart how he sees the problem and then look for overlaps between your perspectives

It's imperative that you try everything out, try to break the system, and try to see it from the perspective of the person who will be trying to place an order.

Thorp's book is chock - full of knotty lessons for investors, thinkers, and business people, but because Thorp is far less well covered than Munger, many of these ideas felt new and let me see them with fresh perspective.

Growing up in Mississippi, the state with the highest population of unbanked and underbanked residents, Allen saw the perfect opportunity to solve a problem that impacts over 2.5 billion people worldwide from a perspective that most wouldn't understand.

7:00 a.m. - 8:00 a.m. Networking Breakfast in Hotel Courtyard 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. Tom Russo, Patner, Gardner, Russo & Gardner [USA] Topic: «Be Right Once» 9:15 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. Justin Fuller, CFA, Stock Analyst, Morningstar [USA] Topic: «Morningstar's Ultimate Stock Picker's Portfolio» 10:15 a.m. - 11:00 p.m. Megh Manseta, Investor, Manseta Family Office [India] Topic: «Buffett Munger Principles in Emerging Markets: An Indian Perspective» 11:15 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. Charles Mizrahi, Managing Partner, CGM Partners Fund LP, Author, Getting Started in Value Investing & Editor, Hidden Value Alert [USA] Topic: «How To Lose $ 1 Million By Investing In Stocks» 12:15 p.m. - 1:15 p.m. Networking Lunch - Executive Deli Sandwiches in Hotel Courtyard (sponsored by Morningstar) 1:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. Piet Viljoen, Portfolio Manager, RE-CM [South Africa] Topic: «Compounding: Your Only Friend in the Investing World» 2:30 p.m. - 2:45 p.m. Sees Chocolate Break 2:45 p.m. - 3:45 p.m. Todd Green, Portfolio Manager, First Manhattan [USA] Topic: «Reflections on 25 Years of Investing» 4:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. Al Ueltschi, Founder & Chairman, FlightSafety, Warren Buffett CEO Topic: «Building a Business Warren Buffett Would Buy: The Story of FlightSafety» [watch video interview] 6:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Optional Tour: Shuttle bus from Ayres Hotel LAX to FlightSafety Training Center ($ 45 shuttle and BBQ buffet dinner fee per person) 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Buffet Dinner and Tour of FlightSafety 9:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. Shuttle bus from FlightSafety to Ayres Hotel LAX

Mark Whitmore: Well, batting clean - up here is a little tough, because as Bill mentioned, I think that people have really nicely covered a lot of the main, sort of theoretical tenants of Austrian Economics, I guess I would add that specifically the role of central banking is something that I think is really distinct from an Austrian perspective vs Keynesianism, specifically the asset price inflation that you've seen has largely been ignored specifically in the last two bubbles, and now we're into a third bubble I would argue as well.

The best thing about being a part of a global network of employees is that you will get a broader perspective on topics, leverage knowledge from people with different backgrounds and work on projects involving so many countries in addition to the one you are seeing every day.

How religion is portrayed in TV and media helps us as Christians to see religion from a perspective of people outside of our Christian communities.

We might consider getting the opinions of a few godly people who are not part of the issue who can stand back and see things from a fresh perspective.

It was amazing to have the perspective that I'm not really over there for football --(and) to see the things that we saw: the people we were close with, the relationships that we built and to see the people who came to Christ and really started walking with him.

It means to see the suffering we go through (whether we want it or not) from the perspective of Christ, Paul, Peter, and countless people who suffered for the sake of their faith and offered their suffering to God as a sacrifice on behalf of others.

I think people really want to know how to think about these big issues of the day, whether it's racism and white supremacy — as you see things like Charlottesville unfold — people want to know how to think about this from a Christian perspective.

Following his lead, all Christians are called to love well across racial and cultural differences, choose to see the world from other people's perspectives, search for and extinguish inequality in the church and society, advocate for each other, esteem one another, and live as true brothers and sisters (Philippians 2:1 - 3).

And I can agree with Trey and still see no reason why those conversations between people of different perspective can't happen and shouldn't happen all the time.

The education of the dominant person, though, is stunted because they only have to see things through their own perspective.

Specifically, I want to provide Calvinists and non-Calvinists with a perspective on certain passages of Scripture which will hopefully allow people to see that there are viable alternatives to Calvinism and it's theological opposite, Arminianism.

Or, seen from the opposite perspective, creation (and with it all of human history) is a partial expression of the exchange of love between the three divine persons from all eternity.

So we're at the place where we can say a couple - four things from the existential side of the problem of evil: [1] from the perspective that pain exists, and we perceive it, we as human beings (you could say «people») have an urge to do something about it when we see it.

Two fold, firstly, you've helped another person live for a little longer by protecting them from the cold, but for you personally that didn't get anything out of it you could look at it from another perspective, anyone could have seen you and acknowledged you benevolence either by saying something or just thinking how nice it was you did that and then maybe also passing along an act of kindness.

To claim that people that see things form a larger perspective as being under the influence of «The Enemy» seems to me to be just more tribal thinking.

The meaning of the event is seen in a post-resurrection perspective «as a manifestation of a general redemption for the whole people of God.»

In my experience the people who most benefit from this are people with a negative experience of Christianity who find the message of grace attractive, but claim that seeing God from a perspective of grace is «not biblical».

Do you see things shifting especially for maybe people who didn't see things from that perspective beforehand?

But people who promote gay marriage are not interested in understanding my perspective (see the comments on the previous 45 pages!).

Like all art, however, each person is going to see what he sees from his own perspective.

From my perspective, the perspective of reason, the person who will break the posted speed limit on the way to church (I see this behavior consistently on Sundays as they whiz past me only to turn into the church parking lot), which would be a «sin» would it not, has absolutely no business looking furtively at a gay person.

It merely displays what sensible people can see is a commonsensical outcome: one tends to hang around with those who share one's own cultural perspective.

Seen from this perspective, the interviewees admit that they agree that abortion is never morally justifiable: a «180» in their thinking about the legalised killing of over 53 million persons in the United States since Roe v. Wade.

People need to cultivate the ability to stand back enough to gain aesthetic and intellectual «distance» between themselves and what they see in the media, and then, from a critical perspective informed by their own faith, look at what the media are doing and saying.

Seeing the bigger picture will allow us to understand other people's perspectives and worldviews, which will allow us to work together to solve tough social challenges we face in our global community.

But to be aware of this and to be interested to see another perspective from another person can be very mind - opening and valuable.

Instead of trying to see things from another person's perspective, we criticize, demonize and tear them down.

My own trinitarian conception of the God - world relationship, as expressed in previous publications, lends itself even more dramatically to a field - oriented understanding of the God - world relationship since it makes clear how the three divine persons of the Christian doctrine of the Trinity can be said to possess a field proper to their own divine being which likewise serves as the «matrix» or ontological ground for the field of activity proper to creation (see, for example, The Divine Matrix 52 - 69 and «Panentheism from a Process Perspective»).

The people I see changing might be experiencing some difficulty and feel ugly at the time, but frequently from my perspective they are becoming even more beautiful, amazing and marvelous.

I would take a different view in that I see one perspective that sees the judgement of people that brings a lot of pain and damage to another group of people, to even tragic ends.

This enables them to be seen in «their proper perspective» — to be shelved, so to speak, alongside the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem, the Crusades and the Inquisition; or, for that matter, alongside any manifestations of inhumanity on a large scale in which people other than Jews were sufferers.

Even Walter Brueggemann values the insights and perspectives of other people, especially those whose gender, race, or socioeconomic status means they see Scripture differently than he.

Through them we see the same person but from different perspectives.

And then comes: the taboo subjects; talking about people as if they are not there (or as if they are an «issue», not a person); assuming everyone (who counts) is of a certain race, ability, class, language, sexuality or gender; various non-biblical behavioural rules; the targeted enforcement of church rules (whether «biblical» or not) on particular groups; and the general reluctance to see things from another's perspective (even if this is a skill that churchgoers use all day, every day, outside thw church).