Not exact matches
How can I be sure my emails will appear properly no
matter what device or platform
people view them on?
Widely available information from commercial data brokers provided
people's names, addresses, shopping habits and more, but failed to distinguish on more fine - grained
matters of personality that might affect political
views.
On that basis, I find it pretty rich when
people talk about the traditional
view on this
matter as stemming from prejudice or ignorance of how
people feel.
I said it to hotair already, but I will expand it a bit for you: what is evidence for some is not accepted by everyone; just as in a court case, some jurors are convinced with very little evidence while some
people can not be convinced of something no
matter how much evidence there is... much of this comes from how you were raised and your own personal world
view, for many
people God does not fit into their world
view so whatever evidence there is they close their eyes and say, «No, I don't believe that!»
I myself seek validation from
people on so many levels, e.g. personal relations, job performance, personal
views on
matters at hand, etc..
Of course, it doesn't
matter because
people who want to believe a skewed partisan idea will do so, no
matter how many balanced
views they are presented.
I hope that
people with a variety of points of
view can agree on much that I have written, although I know that those with some other points of
view see
matters quite differently.
And when I ask for any justification of their
view, I get such comments as Brigitte's above — «Christine said she can't see what
people see in the Bible, so I am not quite sure why it
matters.»
Quantum theory overthrew the deterministic and mechanistic
view of the 18th century and made
people think that
matter moves at random in unpredictable ways.
«The challenge», wrote Father Alexander Lucie - Smith in his Catholic Herald blog shortly after the Holy Father had announced his resignation, «will be in having to watch the airwaves fill with a whole load of
people who are very marginal to Church life, and yet who will be invited to pontificate on all
matters papal and religious, giving it their own particular slant, which they will advance as a mainstream
view.»
If the minister is genuine about his respect for the
person and his
views no
matter what they are, he will not harm the relationship if he appropriately disciplines the
views.
if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no
matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your
view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an athe
view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion
people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The
View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an athe
View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion
people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good
person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.
Matters of belief should be discussed with care and an open
view for the thoughts of others on all sides or someday we will live in a society like Pakistan where Ministers get shot for their belief and scharia is forced upon the
people.
If I have found anything from posting this question, its that it doesn't
matter if your religious or anti-religious,
people are always defensive about their
views (not enough open - mindedness or politeness for that
matter).
How you
view people tends to determine how you treat them no
matter how strongly you love the «golden rule».
For example,
people reading this exchange with a
view to assessing the validity of Madden's criticisms of my position and the soundness of my rebuttal are acting on one of practical reason's per se nota first principles» namely, that intellectual understanding of
matters such as those under discussion is something worth having and expending time and effort to achieve.
In arguing against the possibility of attaining to a neutral standpoint on
matters of concern to religious
persons, one begins with the axiom that all human activity — and so, by extension, all scholarly activity, all religious activity, and all interaction among serious religious
persons — both implies and evinces a commitment to some particular metaphysic, some
view as to the way things are and as to how human activity should proceed in that context.
He said that just when the mass of the
people, and the priests, and the Roman soldiers, Herod and Pilate, and the idle ones on the street, the crowd in the gateway, and the newspaper reporters (if there were any such at that time) in short, when all the powers of the moment, however different their sentiments might have been, were agreed upon this
view of the
matter: that all was lost, hopelessly lost.
It is a
matter of serious consequence for theologians when a film based on religious subject
matter is made, because more
people will be likely to
view that film than have read the New Testament in all history.
Now that
people in the mainline denominations are starting to talk unembarrassedly about church growth and evangelism of a fairly conventional sort, Wheeler worries that the potential exists for any emphasis on congregational studies to be misinterpreted as an outgrowth of the spirit of the times — which
views local communities of believers uncritically, as in - arguably good things, and assumes that if there is anything the
matter with them it is that they aren't big enough.
Then when Barth himself changed his mind — as he so often and so publicly did, as if it were merely a
matter of an excusable error after he had formerly fired so all - inclusive a barrage in support of his now - discarded
view — it is small wonder that many
people became exasperated and, though they might themselves be deeply influenced by him, preferred not to admit it.
Actually, I don't
view success at the Box Office as «the» measure for «Truth,» rather, as an indicator of
people's high interest in the subject
matter, hence spirituality.
This is no slight problem in
view of the fact that there is bad theology in many of the hymns, and the Apostle's Creed, along with great eternally true affirmations, declares belief in such
matters as the resurrection of the body, which few
people who say it now accept.
It's unethical and journalists loose their credibility when they play sound bites that are bits and pieces of a conversation that does not wholly represent a
person's point of
view on a subject
matter.
However, most of them, as Christians, understand that they should
view matters from the point of
view of the masses of the
people.
I've gotten to know a few
people in my life who hold similar
views, needless to say they they're perfect no
matter how bad they act, they love to complain about everyone else and how everything is other
peoples fault instead of taking responsibility for something... They tend to be depressed deep down also... quite fascinating actually.
At the heart of the
matter is western society's lack of a true anthropology, a
view of the human
person as intrinsically good, made for love - the love of God and of each other.
Nobody should be banned from expressing their
views, but shoving them down other
people's throats is a different
matter entirely.
The implications of expressing the thesis as such an equation are (1) if the
viewed action is not at all salient for the
person (i.e., = 0) the action will not affect the viewer's behavior («act»); (2) the chance that a particular
viewed action will affect a
person's behavior will decrease to the extent that they have other alternatives in their «repertoire»; and (3) if the individual is not aroused to act he will not exhibit the
viewed behavior, no
matter how salient it is.
At the end of the day, what really
matters is that a lot of religious
people feel the necessity to impose their
views on
people who believe otherwise.
Part of the reason, Evans believes, is that
people with different
views on these
matters talk past each other rather than converse.
As a child, I didn't pay attention to gay or straight, I
viewed it as if two
people loved each other that is what
mattered.
@Chad, While you may disagree with this
person's
view on the
matter, your assessment that they «have never done an investigation into the bible or it's historicity» or they «never actually bothered to do any investigation at all» seems inaccurate.
The
people who
matter in football have a much clearer
view of his worth.
However, how the conflict is handled
matters very much: Teens do better when they are allowed to express their opinions freely (respectfully, still validating and showing empathy for the other
person's point of
view), without being made to feel that their relationship with their parent is threatened.
Fortunately, no
matter what a
person's personal
view on breastfeeding is, no one can legally stop you from doing it.
No
matter what a
person's
views on the military the fact that our kids can't make it through boot camp because of health concerns is a big deal.
No
matter how well constructed and search engine friendly your titles are, the quality of your image is what will ultimately make
people view the item in more detail, see our Shop Front article «What makes you click?»
Whether or not you and I agree with this
view, there are many well educated, well meaning
people who do sincerely believe that this is entirely a
matter of parental responsibility and they are philosophically opposed to ad bans.
And you all seem to be relatively articulate
people with strong
views on the
matter.
Bullshit — if some
people have a bizarrely distorted
view of him, it
matters, and the best thing to do is drag it out into the light, regardless of whether or not it makes
people who think that way feel stupid or talked - down - to — and a magazine editor is not really responsible for the feelings of
people who don't read his publication.
«The respect he earned over a long life of service means that across our country today
people, no
matter their political
views, will mourn the passing of a great and compassionate man.
No
matter what anti-choice extremist Terrence Murphy does, he won't be able to hide his
views or his record from the
people of the 40th District.»
«It is absolutely vital that, before making their decision on the 23rd of June, voters have been able to hear a broad spectrum of
views covering all the issues that
matter to the British
people.»
Widely available information from commercial data brokers provided
people's names, addresses, shopping habits and more, but failed to distinguish on more fine - grained
matters of personality that might affect political
views.
The report outlines a series of first steps, including holding fewer
people on bail; expanding diversion programs for drug offenders and those with mental illness; and changing state law to treat some low - level offenses — like fare - beating, marijuana possession in public
view, prostitution and possession of so - called gravity knives — as civil rather than criminal
matters.
The
views that
matter are David Cameron's and the settled will of the parliamentary party, party membership, and indeed, judging from the poll at the weekend, the British
people.
To make
matters worse, they have found that
people who are overweight appear to be more sensitive to the effect of
viewing delicious foods.
As long as you love your look,
peoples views don't
matter too much.
Sorry that I am wearing these sneakers again, but it was from the point of
view that I am running around all day taking photos, and that I didn't want to ruin my feet in the process... I got a lot of questions about my t - shirt,
people think I turned it inside - out, but fact of the
matter is, it's supposed to be this way.