We take a look at MXGP 2's first
person viewpoint in a race at Leon, Mexico running on the PlayStation 4...
Not exact matches
Having a contrarian
viewpoint seems sexy and is definitely
in vogue, but holding that contrarian
viewpoint every day and sticking to it
in the face of
people who think you're crazy is pretty hard.
All these small little life things that occurred taught me that you are not alone
in this world, and there are a lot of other
people and their
viewpoints are important to you, and then just watch them and be supportive of each other and all the difficulties they've had
in life.
Recently, I've been doing some mentoring
in a college setting and I'm constantly trying to see the
viewpoint of other
people on the team.
I'm happy to live
in a country where
people can express their
viewpoints; that doesn't mean we need to put up with them.
«This may seem like an anomaly to many
people who might question why AT&T is joining with those who have differing
viewpoints on how to ensure an open and free internet,» AT&T's top lobbyist, Bob Quinn, said
in a blog post on Tuesday.
«The ecumenical movement has broadened my
viewpoint and I recognize now that God has his
people in all churches,» he said
in the early 1950s.
When someone voices his or her
viewpoint on an issue, the
person is creating buy -
in.
You'll get three solid
viewpoints on sharing equity
in «Making Employees Owners» (Managing
People, December 1992, [Article link]-RRB-.
«This may seem like an anomaly to many
people, who might question why AT&T is joining with those who have differing
viewpoints on how to ensure an open and free internet,» Bob Quinn, the senior executive vice president of external and legislative affairs at AT&T, wrote
in a company blog post.
Tip: To learn about trends
in aging and
people living longer, read
Viewpoints on Fidelity.com: Longevity and retirement
I don't know why
people,
in attempting to provide a refutation of an argument, consistently rebut arguments by simply mentioning their nationality, as if being of a certain nationality designates one as an expert
in all matters concerning that nation and serves as sufficient qualification to denounce a valid opposition
viewpoint.
I think oftentimes what we'll see
in the chart
viewpoint is a security that might report earnings favorably and you see, more than likely, a sell the news type of mentality and
people are looking to take profits frequently on an earnings announcement.
One can even consider reaching out to the
people involved
in these discussions, like those on forums, to gain vital insights from a different
viewpoint.
I think there is a certain amount of humility demonstrated
in being able to live
in true community with
people with beliefs and
viewpoints that can be at times
in stark contradiction to your own.
Gerald, not only are you talking about a 2000 year old
viewpoint where
people died off much faster and earlier than they do today, but to quote another verse
in the bible, it says that a mans seed should never be wasted and would serve better
in the belly of a wh * re.
And, from a practical
viewpoint, with the economy
in the tank, unemployment out of limits, and us fighting a war that never had a possible solution, anything a couple of
people can do to make themselves happy is none of anyone's business and, as far as I am concerned, OK.
I went to college to be immersed
in an environment where I could think and explore more of the world,
people's differing
viewpoints and to grow as a
person.
In addition to civil rights for
people of color, women and LGBT, there has been an expansion of religious liberty for minority sects, enforcement of
viewpoint neutrality with respect to access to various public and non-public forums (e.g. religious student groups must be granted equal access to school facilities as their secular counterparts, etc) greater protections against age and disability discrimination, and recognition of habeas corpus rights even for enemy combatants.
Big difference
in those
viewpoints - especially when you are only asking a small handful of
people.
You were referring to «
people like you»
in reference to
people who push their
viewpoints on others (which is a lot like what you do!).
From the
viewpoint of radical therapies he does not emphasize the ways
in which empowerment and involvement
in changing institutions can be profoundly healing and growth - enabling for oppressed
persons.
Smith reminds readers of the idea of divine accommodation, which suggests that «
in the process of divine inspiration, God did not correct every incomplete or mistaken
viewpoint of the biblical authors
in order to communicate through them with their readers... The point of the inspired scripture was to communicate its central point, not to straighten out every kink and dent
in the views of all the
people involved
in biblical inscripturation and reception along the way.»
He is not interested
in converting a
person to one particular religious
viewpoint.
Sure, some
people don't enjoy being single, and the world has made it out to be comparable to a disease, but continually telling
people you're so very sorry about this horrible thing
in their life assumes they're currently unhappy and reinforces the unhealthy
viewpoint that a relationship is the be-all, end - all.
People were asked to locate themselves on the spectrum of identifiable
viewpoints in the public debate.
Putting up a paid for billboard stating an atheist
viewpoint is «pushing your belief on other
people» Yet putting a piece of debris
in the form of a tool of execution that has been used by a religion for centuries on display on government owned land using government money is somehow «not»?
Trying to apply that story to theological discussions such as predestination, who God hates,
people's eternal destiny and similar topics is probably a case of trying to find Bible stories to support a theological
viewpoint, as
in «this is our theology, now let's see if we can find some verses
in the Bible that might support our views».
I would be mightily surprised if the author had hoped that every single
person reading it would adopt his
viewpoint in it's entirety.
People who share similar moral
viewpoints ban together, but nothing is ever set
in stone as being truly beyond the pale.
If you are happy with one of the parties that presently exist, you can be a bore and say why — though I would hope
people could be a bit more imaginative, because let's face it, the Democrats are a 1930s paradigm that fits
in about as well as a zoot suit, and the Republicans are so splintered they seem to be an illusion of a
viewpoint rather than the reality of it.
People, whether they live
in Manila, Moscow or Morgantown, now have nearly simultaneous access to the same images and
viewpoints in the interpretation of events.
Helpful as group counseling proved to be, with each troubled
person in the group (about ten
persons) finding himself strengthened, aided, and cared for by the other members of the group, sometimes there were exasperating dead ends — psychological impasses where it seemed that the counselee had developed a blind spot and simply could not visualize his problem objectively, or from any other
viewpoint than his own.
There were other interpretations of the
person of Jesus which were never caught up
in the main stream of Christian development, and later died out, but the fact that this amount of diversity of thought was eventually included
in the New Testament shows the willingness of the church to hold
in suspension varying and sometimes conflicting
viewpoints.
Kim, You may show up here so you can educate / ridicule those of us with a much less rigid conservative
viewpoint, but by just condemning
people and their ideas
in that way, you lose any authority or influence to teach.
I guess living
in make - believe land is easier than trying to face the truth of the Universe, but to see such a large number of
people deluded into «praying» to nonexistent gods simply reaffirms the
viewpoint that the greatest promoter of ignorance is religion.
Why is it that
people on the right assume that because
people on the left have different
viewpoints on the role of religion, that we don't believe
in God.
In his 2010 book Sobre el caelo y la Tierra he talks of balancing «strength» and «firmness» with an assumption in dialogue that «there is room in the heart for the other person's viewpoint, opinion, ideas.&raqu
In his 2010 book Sobre el caelo y la Tierra he talks of balancing «strength» and «firmness» with an assumption
in dialogue that «there is room in the heart for the other person's viewpoint, opinion, ideas.&raqu
in dialogue that «there is room
in the heart for the other person's viewpoint, opinion, ideas.&raqu
in the heart for the other
person's
viewpoint, opinion, ideas.»
In some cases, the character's own
viewpoint is more pessimistic than that of the
people who knew him.
Using this religious
viewpoint as their justification for 1) inflicting suffering on others and, 2) ignoring the suffering of others, all while encouraging and engineering the suffering of everyone they can,... is a clear indication that the Catholic religion is psychopathic
in thought, word, and deed and should be abolished by all peace - loving and caring
people everywhere... especially any Catholics who never look closely at what the whole Church is doing!
This is possible however — I have to agree with Shelly to some degree — what gets a
person to that
viewpoint — unless one values their belief
in God (which usually is the antecedent to wanting to honor those idea from the commandments).
By actively trying to bring
in talent with diverse backgrounds and providing internal and external training, the company believes it is challenging
people to change their
viewpoints and embrace a culture where everyone feels they can express their ideas.
Thank you for you honest analytical
viewpoint ken and backing me up on the punctuation my phone is problematic and to get all the marks right takes three times or more as long but i feel the content is there, and rsh i was not hiding behind referee decisions i said clearly that you do nt win or lose based on the refs you have 90 minutes to win a game i was meaning overall across the league this year its been bad almost as bad as our honor as club supporters we made to a final and win ir lose that looks good to
people across the globe but the fans embarrassed the club on a global stage by walking out no honor
in defeat.
I found it interesting that you used the words
in your comment that
people on here should «grow up», and then indicate that there is no open discussion of the problems on here but that you are obviously then openly discussing them elsewhere
in an unbiased way that looks at the discussion from different angles and accepts different
viewpoints.
I get quite a lot of stick for being critical of referees
in Arsenal games, and I'll be the first to admit that my observations are built on bias, so of course there is a good chance that
people may disagree with my
viewpoints, particularly when their biases lay elsewhere.
In our casual, everyday conversations around the dinner table, if we do not try and consistently see things from another person's viewpoint, if we do not try and understand how someone else who is struggling has gotten to the point of trouble that they are in, our teen will see us as judgmenta
In our casual, everyday conversations around the dinner table, if we do not try and consistently see things from another
person's
viewpoint, if we do not try and understand how someone else who is struggling has gotten to the point of trouble that they are
in, our teen will see us as judgmenta
in, our teen will see us as judgmental.
Fed Up has good intentions and raises valid issues, but it is almost two hours long and is so broad
in its condemnation of the food industry that it's questionable whether it will find a viewership beyond the
people who already agree with the producers»
viewpoint, or whether it will have any impact on public policy.
We would like to assemble a wide range of
viewpoints and perspectives, and provide viewers with a detailed and holistic picture of how each
person plays a different role
in the life of a child with Selective Mutism.
Instead of trusting
in a single well defined ruleset and the organization that carries it out,
people would have to trust that
in the
viewpoint of every individual they have contact with, they aren't egligible for punishment.
The
viewpoint that citizenship is an ensemble of practices enables scholars to investigate the concrete ways
in which states fashion citizens (Ong, 1999) as well as the ways
in which
people forge their collective selves as citizens (Lazar and Nuitjen, 2013).