Sentences with phrase «person whether men»

Not exact matches

Whether they admit it or not, people tend to treat women a bit more fragilely than they do men.

GOP Representatives Ron DeSantis and Jeff Duncan both said a man police identified as Hodgkinson spoke to them just before the shooting and asked whether the people at the baseball practice were Republicans or Democrats.

We can use our genetic data to find men and women who have had a child together6, which lets us see whether similar people tend to pair up using a very different data set.

On the way to a work dinner in Los Angeles, two senior men debated whether Los Angeles or Portland had better strip clubs, according to a person who attended, as the women traveling with them in the van stared out the windows.

For if a man or a woman's body — or his or her status as a married person, or his capacity to be a father or hers to be a mother — doesn't matter for his or her sex life, why, then, should anyone imagine that the body of the Son of God matters, whether it is in a manger, on a cross, risen, or fully and really present under the signs of bread and wine?

The questions is whether or not people are willing to see God as an old man in a robe with who creates essence out of nothing, or if people are willing to see God as the «creative» event that occured, a so - called actual essence of energy that was the over-all reason why we are here now.

I am so sick of hearing and seeing the word «miracle» thrown around when 1 out of many people survives some horrible tragedy, whether caused by man or the chaos of natural phenomena.

in the day, s that jesus our lord was on the earth (jesus) there was many people named jesus, just as among hispanic and central american peoples, it was a common popular name of many people, if you want to prove to your self that jesus was not married, look up what the apostle said,» i saw standing upon mount zion with the lamb 144,000, these are they that have washed thier robes and were not defilled with women, for they are virgins, jesus emphasised in parts the need and values of a husband and wife in a home, the two mary, s and the women that followed him and ministered unto him tells us the great importance of women, and women in the home, he wanted all married men to have thier own wife, in those days of so many years ago there was false prophets, storytellers, wild imaginations, he told us not to believe them, whether you are catholic, christian, islamic or any other, we can all take pride in the fact what the prohets, jesus and the apostles told us all fits jointly to gether, they were a work of love, to understand the christian bible correctly, islamic people are not rejected, but rather they are a equal, the angel told hagar to return to her mistress, he also told her he would make ishmael a blessing and his seed a great nation, regards

I can't rightly decide whether I'm the first person, trying really hard to throw a festively plump middle man to the next step, or if I'm the third guy, crumpling under the weight of an unhealthily large system that doesn't work any more.

God's people do not take comfort in the eternal punishment for that rejection, but we do take comfort that God will be glorified eternally by all men, whether in heaven with Him by His grace and love, or separated as receivers of His righteous wrath.

D. Martyn Lloyd - Jones (1899 - 1981)[in an excerpt from Romans: The New Man, An Exposition of Chapter 6, Banner of Truth, 1972] said: There is no better test as to whether a man is really preaching the New Testament gospel of salvation than this, that some people might misunderstand it and misinterpret it to mean that it really amounts to this, that because you are saved by grace alone it does not matter at all what you do; you can go on sinning as much as you like because it will redound all the more to the glory of graMan, An Exposition of Chapter 6, Banner of Truth, 1972] said: There is no better test as to whether a man is really preaching the New Testament gospel of salvation than this, that some people might misunderstand it and misinterpret it to mean that it really amounts to this, that because you are saved by grace alone it does not matter at all what you do; you can go on sinning as much as you like because it will redound all the more to the glory of graman is really preaching the New Testament gospel of salvation than this, that some people might misunderstand it and misinterpret it to mean that it really amounts to this, that because you are saved by grace alone it does not matter at all what you do; you can go on sinning as much as you like because it will redound all the more to the glory of grace.

«There is no better test as to whether a man is really preaching the New Testament gospel of salvation than this, that some people might misunderstand it and misinterpret it to mean that it really amounts to this, that because you are saved by grace alone it does not matter at all what you do;....

Thus far, with one exception, the sayings have all been clearly of a type for which «the Son of Man» and the first person singular, whether verb or pronoun, were interchangeable.

Blended with such primitive conceptions was the idea of the sacred bond created between man and man and between man and deity, whether by sharing in a common feast or by having the blood of the sacrifice applied both to the sacred altar and to the persons of the devotees.

Failure to recognize this simple and patent truth about the people of our time, whether they be educated or uneducated, sophisticated or simple, explains to a large degree the admitted failure of what is compendiously called «neo-orthodoxy» to communicate itself significantly to the ordinary man and woman of our day.

Furthermore I've seen many a believer get really upset (I mean, like really really upset) that atheism leads people to question whether man has any cosmic significance, why is this so important?

«37 Thus, whether the specialness of an event is due only to an interpreter of the event, or whether it is due to both a person who is speaking and acting and to someone receiving this as a special act, it is man who turns an ordinary act of God into a special one.

Whether it becomes obvious to men or not, double - mindedness is none the less present, and the double - minded person is to be pitied.

Love the fact that people give sexual expression to «who they really are»» whether heterosexual or homosexual» but hate these men for belonging to an institution that teaches that sexual expression is not necessary to being who you really are.

His works of healing — whether of the bodies or souls of men — were always prompted by compassion for persons as he sought to do the will of God.

Men have differed as regards what people you ought to be unselfish to - whether it was only your own family, or your fellow countrymen, or everyone.

I only make sure to define these men as communist because whether or not they were «just following orders» or not, their bloody reigns of terror were brought on because they had an unquenchable thirst for power and allowing people to worship something other than the supreme leader didn't cut it.

RD.. How path - et - ic to see your hate and fear driving you to death...!?! Man pull your self together and have the courage to face the returns of your deeds... Wars were always there in life whether were religious or not so stop doing it on your self... Beside learn to wish people well whether you agree or disagree with might you succeed in life rather than being a loser... by being a cowered... My posts were meant for the friendly people I had known for some time, whom I found they were full of compassion and not for black hearted one's like you who hate all God creations...

Even mohammad's own men evidently questioned whether they should be pursuing and killing people who did not pose a threat to them, since it seemed to contradict earlier, more passive teachings.

In the first paragraph of the first essay of The Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton introduced the basic theme: «It seems to have been reserved to the people of this country, by their conduct and example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force.»

By itself, this might not mean that the two people were men, for Greek (as in most languages) can use male words and pronouns to refer generically to «people» whether they are male or female.

Throughgrace and through nature (for God has made them one economy and one identity in the humanity of Christ) Christ (whether passible on earth or impassible but living in His Church, His Sacraments, and His People) is an «ecological» influence if you like, which reaches, especially through us men, into every aspect of creation.

The most important implication of all this is that marriage counselors and enrichers, whether ministers or lay persons, need to have increased awareness — a raised consciousness in the area of women's and men's liberation!

By the way, whether this gifted man (or any of the others you cited) believed or not is quite beside the point of whether there is a god, but I get frustrated when people wrongly attribute a belief in [always their] god to him.

The whole POINT of the evangel is to let people know that it is GOOD NEWS, and that» eventually» every man shall bow» willfully» believing in Jesus, whether they bel; ieve now or in hell, or later at the restitution of ALL > But, yes, some people (many) will not believe now, and will surely go straight to Hell (grave) and rest there in their agony of separation, and some will repent.

Word, whether it be of God or of man, is properly understood as communication, and it is rather meaningless to discuss word in terms of one person.

In the verse immediately following there is a story about a man who desired to build a tower but first sat down to calculate whether he was capable of doing it, lest people might laugh at him afterwards.

The other thought i had on this is that if we follow Jesus he will make us fishers of men we need guidance by the holy spirit to lead us to the right people to share our faith.I can still remember those days of people preaching in the streets I am not certain whether that method was effective.

In my youth, I saw witnesses all around me, men and women, rabbis and laity, whose evident fortitude of faith, whether in God or in the vitality of the Jewish people, made doubt inconceivable in their presence.

She is identified as a deacon, which in the New Testament referred to a teacher and leader in the church, whether that person was a man or woman.

I believe that she is the best person and only person (other than his wife - who has apologized for her actions) who knows whether or not his man is actually mentally ill.

Whether it is a mega church pastor who hires young men to have sex with him or a politician who gets inside info and makes lots of $ $ $ on insider trading, some people abuse their position.

If only a «man» and a «woman» can get «married», then you have to have CLEAR definitions of all 3 terms so that you can rule in each case whether 2 people can «marry» or not.

Some also point out that the relationship between the two men is addressed with the same words and emphasis as other love relationships in the Hebrew Testament, whether heterose.xual or between God and people: e.g. «ahava» or אהבה.

In the light of this analysis, then, my own scenario is cautiously hopeful, depending on (1) whether a creative minority of dreamers and doers with visions of a new life - fulfilling social order really emerges in strength, (2) the alliances that can be worked out with blacks, the poor, and other minorities now excluded from major social benefits, (3) the extent to which the populist idealism of the lower middle classes and working people generally favoring the extension of rights and equality to the «little man» everywhere wins out over the reactionary fears and prejudices which establishment elites and opportunist politicians are all too willing to exploit, and (4) what takes place at the center of the political spectrum itself under the pressure of events and in response to challenges to the established system from militant seekers of change.

God could had it been both ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...

God could had creation either ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...

The typical Western man probably feels sure that angels, devils, and spirits do not exist in reality but only as figments in deluded imaginations, but he is not ashamed to admit that he does not yet know whether there are such entities as people on other planets.

We don't know whether he was a cold man with habitually averted eyes who never saw the beggar at all or whether he did notice, maybe said a prayer for a sorry case, but stuck to his policy of never giving anything directly to street people.

«Liberty» is as close as we get to an ethical norm, and that term is deeply ambiguous, depending on whether it is, in John Winthrop's words, freedom to do the just and the good (Christian freedom) or freedom to do what you list (the freedom of natural man).10 While American civil religion remained extremely vague with respect to particular values and virtues, the public theology that fleshed it out and made it convincing to ordinary people used it with more explicitly Christian, particularly Protestant, values.

Process theologians generally prefer the tradition of John Duns Scotus, which holds that God predestined the person of Jesus as the crowning of creation and as the total manifestation of his love, regardless of whether man sinned.

Rather, it resides in the relationship with God which such existence may and does enjoy, whether this is realized or actualized in a vivid manner or is present only as a kind of Leitmotif which runs through the whole history of the human race and the personal history of each and every human person as a member of the society of men and women.

It does not matter whether one is by God's providential decree placed in the role of politician, engaged in public action for the common good, or in the role of a lover of wisdom (philosopher), engaged as a private person in contemplation of eternal truths, or in some combination of the two: «A man can still lead a life of faith in any of these three lives and reach the eternal rewards.

Men sinned — they failed whether in their relations with each other, or with themselves; when the failure had an element of deliberation in it, it was in some sense an attack on the Church, on society and on the inner life of grace in a person.

What if most Americans really don't care whether or not the government killed eighty - plus men, women, and children for no other reason than that they adhered to what most people view as kooky religious beliefs?