Sentences with phrase «personal defendants in this case»

[15] The two personal defendants in this case carried out all of their corporate responsibilities with the authority vested in them.

Not exact matches

At stake is whether Brown will maintain «standing» in the case — whether she can show «that some personal legal interest has been invaded by the defendant.»

In Section 1983 Damages — Part II, Pattis writes about the personal challenges and societal concerns he has experienced when involved with cases that assess damages insurance companies end up paying — not defendants.

Leduc involved a personal injury case in which the plaintiff claimed damages for loss of enjoyment as a result of defendant's negligence.

In personal injury and clinical negligence cases, defendants can not recover their costs because of qualified one - way costs shifting.

Blois, Nickerson & Bryson LLP acts on behalf of plaintiffs and defendants in a wide range of insurance and personal injury cases.

In a South Florida personal injury case, either party may be inclined to retain an expert to offer their opinion on an element of the plaintiff's claim or an affirmative defense offered by the defendant.

To collect monetary compensation in a personal injury case venued in Montana, a successful litigant must show that the defendant was negligent.

In personal injury lawsuits, the case is pursued as a civil action and does not intend to prove the guilt of a defendant or whether or not a crime was committed.

Typically, the parties that will be engaged in a Work Injury Case would be: Employer and their Defense Lawyer, Insurance Company / ies, Workers Compensation, Doctor / s, Therapist / s and of course the Personal Injury Attorney hired by the defendant.

The group, which also includes professionals in the firm's Washington, Chicago and Phoenix offices, has handled litigation in more than 30 states in cases ranging from putative nationwide class actions and mass actions for personal injury and property damage to complex environmental investigation and / or remediation issues and matters involving multiple defendants and hundreds of products.

In a personal injury case, the injured individual (the plaintiff) will seek to recover damages in the form of financial compensation from the individual (the defendant), who caused the injurIn a personal injury case, the injured individual (the plaintiff) will seek to recover damages in the form of financial compensation from the individual (the defendant), who caused the injurin the form of financial compensation from the individual (the defendant), who caused the injury.

If the case is not settled, the personal injury lawyer can represent you in court, prepare discovery documents, prepare motions for court consideration and present a case in front of a judge or jury that outlines how the accident happened and how the defendant is responsible for the damages that you sustained.

The article explains the current levels of automation among vehicles on the market, investments in the industry and ramifications for auto insurers and plaintiffs and defendants in personal injury cases.

The plaintiff in the case of Rodriguez v. H.E.B. Grocery Company filed a personal injury lawsuit after he alleged that he was injured when he tripped on an unsecured plate in the parking lot of a property that was operated by the defendant.

California Civil Code Section 3294 allows a plaintiff in a personal injury case to seek punitive damages when «the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice.»

Defendants often have a legal team of top notch lawyers who are experts in tort law and well versed in all the ways needed to minimize or deny the settlement claims in personal injury cases.

After a verdict is reached in a civil case like a personal injury case, either the plaintiff or the defendant may move for a new trial.

Defendants» insurance companies usually employ in - house attorneys who specialize in litigating auto accident and personal injury cases.

In this personal injury case, the defendant's insurer had agreed to attend mediation but advised at the mediation itself that it was not interested in settling the casIn this personal injury case, the defendant's insurer had agreed to attend mediation but advised at the mediation itself that it was not interested in settling the casin settling the case.

The Act applies in personal injury cases where the court finds that the claimant is entitled to damages but, upon an application by the defendant, the court is satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that the claimant has been «fundamentally dishonest» in relation to the primary claim or a related claim.

In a personal injury case in Colorado, the burden of proof that a plaintiff carries to prove causation is proof by preponderance of the evidence, which essentially means that the plaintiff must prove that it is more likely than not that their injuries were caused by the actions of the defendanIn a personal injury case in Colorado, the burden of proof that a plaintiff carries to prove causation is proof by preponderance of the evidence, which essentially means that the plaintiff must prove that it is more likely than not that their injuries were caused by the actions of the defendanin Colorado, the burden of proof that a plaintiff carries to prove causation is proof by preponderance of the evidence, which essentially means that the plaintiff must prove that it is more likely than not that their injuries were caused by the actions of the defendant.

The burden for proving that a defendant's negligence was the legal cause of a plaintiff's injuries is lower, however, than it is in a standard personal injury case.

The final step in a personal injury case after proving negligence is to show how the plaintiff was injured by the defendant's inaction or action.

As our Delray Beach injury lawyers at Aronberg, Aronberg & Green understand, defendants in personal injury cases need not necessarily be parties who took an active, direct role in causing harm to the victim.

The plaintiff in a personal injury case typically seeks monetary compensation from the defendant for the injuries he or she endured.

When I qualified I gained valuable experience handling high volume RTA litigation cases before moving to leading Health Service firm Capsticks 1995 and specialising in defendant clinical negligence and personal injury.

Breach of the Duty of Care The second element that a plaintiff in a Denver personal injury case must prove is that the defendant breached the duty of care owed to the plaintiff.

He has represented both plaintiffs and defendants in cases involving a wide variety of claims, including breach of contract, professional malpractice, personal injury, insurance bad faith, and debt and judgment collection actions.

In personal injury cases, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant is liable by proving that a reasonable and responsible person would have behaved differently than the defendant if faced with the same scenario.

To collect a recovery in a personal injury case in Missouri, a successful plaintiff must prove the defendant was negligent.

In determining the appropriate damages to award, Justice Stinson drew from the purposes in awarding damages in sexual battery cases, as the defendant's conduct in the present case also offended and compromised the plaintiff's dignity and personal autonomIn determining the appropriate damages to award, Justice Stinson drew from the purposes in awarding damages in sexual battery cases, as the defendant's conduct in the present case also offended and compromised the plaintiff's dignity and personal autonomin awarding damages in sexual battery cases, as the defendant's conduct in the present case also offended and compromised the plaintiff's dignity and personal autonomin sexual battery cases, as the defendant's conduct in the present case also offended and compromised the plaintiff's dignity and personal autonomin the present case also offended and compromised the plaintiff's dignity and personal autonomy.

Achieved dismissal of hostile work environment, retaliation and breach of implied contract claims, and dismissal of individual defendants (President and Vice President) in discrimination / harassments case, establishing law in our jurisdiction regarding personal liability of supervisors.

It could be that the judge was previous an attorney who represented someone (defendant, victim, key witness) involved in the case, it could be that the judge was a family member or former employer of the defense attorney, it could be that someone close to the judge or the judge personally was a victim of another crime committed by the person, it could be that the defendant or the defendant's family was a personal or family friend.

«Even without juries being informed of jury nullification, cases have been won here in New Jersey with jurors, after watching defendant testimony, deciding for either moral or personal reasons not to convict, concluding that the charges were unjust,» Peditto said.

The only exception to comparative fault involves cases in which the defendants are found to have conspired to commit an intentional act that led to the victim's personal injury.

Whether it be a Massachusetts car accident, slip and fall, or any other type of personal injury case, the injury victim must prove the following elements in order to win a negligence case against a defendant:

Direct examination can be used to question either a lay witness, such as the injured plaintiff or defendant in a personal injury case, or to question an expert.

During his legal career, Winston has represented both plaintiffs and defendants in a multitude of cases in the areas of personal injury and criminal defense.

Punitive damages are designed to punish the defendant and act as a deterrent, but are rarely awarded in personal injury cases.

But the trial judge dismissed the case for lack of personal jurisdiction, which undoubtedly left the defendants happy as pigs in... oh, never mind.

After the jury returned the verdict for the defendant in Johnson v. McCullough, the plaintiff's lawyer searched a litigation database and found a non-responsive juror had been a defendant in multiple debt collection cases and a personal injury case.

Later he adds, «Of course, this doesn't mean that a police officer is free to download a defendant's nude pictures from her cell phone on to his personal PDA at the time of her arrest, which is what allegedly happened in a recent case...»

In deciding as to whether to grant a stay of the proceedings in Sabatini, Greene found the personal prejudice suffered by the defendants in other cases where police had improperly failed to release them was greater than in Sabatini'In deciding as to whether to grant a stay of the proceedings in Sabatini, Greene found the personal prejudice suffered by the defendants in other cases where police had improperly failed to release them was greater than in Sabatini'in Sabatini, Greene found the personal prejudice suffered by the defendants in other cases where police had improperly failed to release them was greater than in Sabatini'in other cases where police had improperly failed to release them was greater than in Sabatini'in Sabatini's.

In order to recover damages in a negligence case, the person filing the claim (the plaintiff) must prove: 1) the defendant had a duty to act a certain way; 2) the defendant failed to act according to that duty; 3) the plaintiff was injured as a result; and 4) the plaintiff suffered losses and expenses due to that injury.Attorney J. Todd Tenge has been handling personal injury claims for Boulder, Denver, and Fort Collins residents for 20 years, and has a consistent track record of very successful outcomeIn order to recover damages in a negligence case, the person filing the claim (the plaintiff) must prove: 1) the defendant had a duty to act a certain way; 2) the defendant failed to act according to that duty; 3) the plaintiff was injured as a result; and 4) the plaintiff suffered losses and expenses due to that injury.Attorney J. Todd Tenge has been handling personal injury claims for Boulder, Denver, and Fort Collins residents for 20 years, and has a consistent track record of very successful outcomein a negligence case, the person filing the claim (the plaintiff) must prove: 1) the defendant had a duty to act a certain way; 2) the defendant failed to act according to that duty; 3) the plaintiff was injured as a result; and 4) the plaintiff suffered losses and expenses due to that injury.Attorney J. Todd Tenge has been handling personal injury claims for Boulder, Denver, and Fort Collins residents for 20 years, and has a consistent track record of very successful outcomes.

For almost 30 years, venue of patent cases utilized the general federal venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (c), which allows a corporation to be sued «in any judicial district in which such defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction.»

In a case alleging some type of personal injury or damage to property, the defendant will usually be the person or business who actually caused the injury or damage (for example, the person who hit your car or broke your window).

Michigan court rules allow a defendant in any personal injury case, including an auto accident lawsuit, to have an independent medical expert examine the injured party and issue an opinion regarding the injuries.

While Florida's law is different from that applied in the case, the case is still instructive to Florida personal injury plaintiffs because the division of fault between the plaintiff and the defendant is an issue for the jury to determine.

A claimant must prove three elements to win a personal injury case: (1) that the defendant owed him a duty of care, (2) that the defendant's behaviour breached the standard of care, and (3) that the claimant suffered damage caused (in fact and... Continue reading →